Prakongsai Phusit, Limwattananon Supon, Tangcharoensathien Viroj
International Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand.
Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res. 2009;21:57-81.
This chapter assesses health equity achievements of the Thai health system before and after the introduction of the universal coverage (UC) policy. It examines five dimensions of equity: equity in financial contributions, the incidence of catastrophic health expenditure, the degree of impoverishment as a result of household out-of-pocket payments for health, equity in health service use and the incidence of public subsidies for health.
The standard methods proposed by O'Donnell, van Doorslaer, and Wagstaff (2008b) were used to measure equity in financial contribution, healthcare utilization and public subsidies, and in assessing the incidence of catastrophic health expenditure and impoverishment. Two major national representative household survey datasets were used: Socio-Economic Surveys and Health and Welfare Surveys.
General tax was the most progressive source of finance in Thailand. Because this source dominates total financing, the overall outcome was progressive, with the rich contributing a greater share of their income than the poor. The low incidence of catastrophic health expenditure and impoverishment before UC was further reduced after UC. Use of healthcare and the distribution of government subsidies were both pro-poor: in particular, the functioning of primary healthcare (PHC) at the district level serves as a "pro-poor hub" in translating policy into practice and equity outcomes.
The Thai health financing reforms have been accompanied by nationwide extension of PHC coverage, mandatory rural health service by new graduates and systems redesign, especially the introduction of a contracting model and closed-ended provider payment methods. Together, these changes have led to a more equitable and more efficient health system. Institutional capacity to generate evidence and to translate it into policy decisions, effective implementation and comprehensive monitoring and evaluation are essential to successful system-level reforms.
本章评估泰国全民覆盖(UC)政策实施前后其卫生系统在健康公平方面取得的成就。它考察了公平的五个维度:财政贡献公平、灾难性卫生支出发生率、家庭自付医疗费用导致的贫困程度、卫生服务利用公平以及公共卫生补贴发生率。
采用奥唐奈、范多斯拉尔和瓦格斯塔夫(2008b)提出的标准方法来衡量财政贡献、医疗服务利用和公共补贴方面的公平性,并评估灾难性卫生支出和贫困发生率。使用了两个具有全国代表性的主要家庭调查数据集:社会经济调查和健康与福利调查。
一般税收是泰国最具累进性的财政来源。由于这一来源在总融资中占主导地位,总体结果具有累进性,富人比穷人贡献了更大比例的收入。全民覆盖政策实施前灾难性卫生支出和贫困发生率较低,实施后进一步降低。医疗服务的使用和政府补贴的分配都有利于穷人:特别是,地区层面的初级卫生保健(PHC)运作作为将政策转化为实践和公平成果的“扶贫中心”。
泰国的卫生筹资改革伴随着全国范围内初级卫生保健覆盖范围的扩大、新毕业生的强制性农村卫生服务以及系统重新设计,特别是引入了合同制模式和封闭式提供者支付方式。这些变化共同导致了一个更加公平和高效的卫生系统。生成证据并将其转化为政策决策、有效实施以及全面监测和评估的机构能力对于成功的系统层面改革至关重要。