• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Performance of Thailand's universal health coverage scheme: Evaluating the effectiveness of annual public hearings.泰国全民健康覆盖计划的绩效评估:年度公开听证会的效果评估。
Health Expect. 2020 Dec;23(6):1594-1602. doi: 10.1111/hex.13142. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
2
Legislating for public accountability in universal health coverage, Thailand.泰国全民健康覆盖中的公共问责立法。
Bull World Health Organ. 2020 Feb 1;98(2):117-125. doi: 10.2471/BLT.19.239335. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
3
Procedural fairness in benefit package design: inclusion of pre-exposure prophylaxis of HIV in Universal Coverage Scheme in Thailand.程序公平性在福利套餐设计中的应用:泰国全民医疗保险计划纳入艾滋病毒暴露前预防。
Health Policy Plan. 2023 Nov 14;38(Supplement_1):i36-i48. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czad061.
4
The Process of Listing Prostheses and Medical Devices in Thailand's Universal Health Coverage.泰国全民健康覆盖中医疗器械和假体的列名过程。
Value Health Reg Issues. 2024 Jul;42:100990. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2024.100990. Epub 2024 May 22.
5
Socioeconomic inequalities in health outcomes among Thai older population in the era of Universal Health Coverage: trends and decomposition analysis.泰国全民健康覆盖时代老年人口健康结局的社会经济不平等:趋势和分解分析。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Aug 2;22(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01952-0.
6
Participatory and responsive governance in universal health coverage: an analysis of legislative provisions in Thailand.全民健康覆盖中的参与式和回应式治理:对泰国立法条款的分析。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Feb;6(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004117.
7
Utilisation, out-of-pocket payments and access before and after COVID-19: Thailand's Universal Health Coverage Scheme.新冠疫情前后的使用情况、自费支付情况和可及性:泰国的全民健康覆盖计划。
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 May 13;9(5):e015179. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015179.
8
Effective coverage of diabetes and hypertension: an analysis of Thailand's national insurance database 2016-2019.糖尿病和高血压的有效覆盖:对泰国2016 - 2019年国家保险数据库的分析
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 1;12(12):e066289. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066289.
9
Analysis of health promotion and prevention financing mechanisms in Thailand.泰国健康促进与预防融资机制分析
Health Promot Int. 2017 Aug 1;32(4):702-710. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daw010.
10
Retrospective secondary data analysis to identify high-cost users in inpatient department of hospitals in Thailand, a middle-income country with universal healthcare coverage.泰国是一个具有全民医保覆盖的中等收入国家,对其医院住院部的患者进行回顾性二次数据分析,以识别出高费用患者。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 28;11(7):e047330. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047330.

引用本文的文献

1
Stigma experiences and adaptations in accessing healthcare services among hill tribes in Thailand: A qualitative study.泰国山地部落人群在获取医疗服务过程中的污名化经历及适应策略:一项定性研究
PLoS One. 2025 May 2;20(5):e0321119. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321119. eCollection 2025.
2
Using evidence from civil society in national and subnational health policy processes: a qualitative evidence synthesis.在国家和地方卫生政策制定过程中运用来自民间社会的证据:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 20;6(6):CD015810. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015810.
3
Citizen engagement in national health insurance in rural western Kenya.肯尼亚西部农村地区的全民医保中的公民参与。
Health Policy Plan. 2024 Apr 10;39(4):387-399. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czae007.
4
Procedural fairness in benefit package design: inclusion of pre-exposure prophylaxis of HIV in Universal Coverage Scheme in Thailand.程序公平性在福利套餐设计中的应用:泰国全民医疗保险计划纳入艾滋病毒暴露前预防。
Health Policy Plan. 2023 Nov 14;38(Supplement_1):i36-i48. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czad061.
5
Developing the improved Community Health Fund in Tanzania: was it a fair process?坦桑尼亚改善社区卫生基金的发展:这是一个公平的过程吗?
Health Policy Plan. 2023 Nov 14;38(Supplement_1):i83-i95. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czad067.
6
Criteria for the procedural fairness of health financing decisions: a scoping review.卫生筹资决策程序公正性标准:范围综述。
Health Policy Plan. 2023 Nov 14;38(Supplement_1):i13-i35. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czad066.
7
Procedural fairness in health financing for universal health coverage: why, what and how.全民健康覆盖卫生筹资中的程序公平:为何、是什么以及如何实现。
Health Policy Plan. 2023 Nov 14;38(Supplement_1):i1-i4. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czad069.
8
New strides towards fair processes for financing universal health coverage.在为全民健康覆盖筹集资金的公平进程方面取得新进展。
Health Policy Plan. 2023 Nov 14;38(Supplement_1):i5-i8. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czad065.
9
Participatory and responsive governance in universal health coverage: an analysis of legislative provisions in Thailand.全民健康覆盖中的参与式和回应式治理:对泰国立法条款的分析。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Feb;6(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004117.

本文引用的文献

1
Legislating for public accountability in universal health coverage, Thailand.泰国全民健康覆盖中的公共问责立法。
Bull World Health Organ. 2020 Feb 1;98(2):117-125. doi: 10.2471/BLT.19.239335. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
2
Creating sustainable health care systems.创建可持续的医疗保健系统。
J Health Organ Manag. 2019 Mar 18;33(1):18-34. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-02-2018-0065. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
3
Strategic purchasing and health system efficiency: A comparison of two financing schemes in Thailand.战略性采购与卫生系统效率:泰国两种筹资方案的比较。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 2;13(4):e0195179. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195179. eCollection 2018.
4
Health Priority Setting in Iran: Evaluating Against the Social Values Framework.伊朗的卫生重点设定:对照社会价值观框架进行评估
Glob J Health Sci. 2016 Oct 1;8(10):53834. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v8n10p212.
5
Accelerating health equity: the key role of universal health coverage in the Sustainable Development Goals.加速健康公平:全民健康覆盖在可持续发展目标中的关键作用。
BMC Med. 2015 Apr 29;13:101. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0342-3.
6
Achieving universal health coverage goals in Thailand: the vital role of strategic purchasing.在泰国实现全民健康覆盖目标:战略采购的关键作用。
Health Policy Plan. 2015 Nov;30(9):1152-61. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czu120. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
7
Integration at the round table: marine spatial planning in multi-stakeholder settings.圆桌会议上的整合:多利益相关方背景下的海洋空间规划
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 9;9(10):e109964. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109964. eCollection 2014.
8
Monitoring and evaluating progress towards Universal Health Coverage in Thailand.监测和评估泰国全民健康覆盖的进展情况。
PLoS Med. 2014 Sep 22;11(9):e1001726. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001726. eCollection 2014 Sep.
9
Promoting universal financial protection: how the Thai universal coverage scheme was designed to ensure equity.推动普遍金融保护:泰国全民覆盖计划如何确保公平性。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2013 Aug 6;11:25. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-11-25.
10
From experiential knowledge to public participation: social learning at the community fisheries action roundtable.从经验知识到公众参与:社区渔业行动圆桌会议上的社会学习。
Environ Manage. 2013 Aug;52(2):321-34. doi: 10.1007/s00267-013-0059-z. Epub 2013 May 22.

泰国全民健康覆盖计划的绩效评估:年度公开听证会的效果评估。

Performance of Thailand's universal health coverage scheme: Evaluating the effectiveness of annual public hearings.

机构信息

Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.

International Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2020 Dec;23(6):1594-1602. doi: 10.1111/hex.13142. Epub 2020 Oct 9.

DOI:10.1111/hex.13142
PMID:33034411
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7752199/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Legislative provisions in Thailand's National Health Security Act 2002 mandate annual public hearings for providers, beneficiaries and other stakeholders in order to improve the performance of the Universal Health Coverage Scheme (UCS).

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to explore the annual public hearing process, evaluate its effectiveness and propose recommendations for improvement.

METHOD

In-depth interviews were conducted with 29 key informants from various stakeholder groups involved in annual public hearings.

RESULTS

The evaluation showed that the public hearings fully met the criteria of influence over policy decision and partially met the criteria of appropriate participation approach and social learning. However, there are rooms for improvement on public hearing's inclusiveness and representativeness of participants, adequacy of information and transparency.

CONCLUSIONS

Three recommendations were proposed a) informing stakeholders in advance of the agenda and hearing process to enable their active participation; b) identifying experienced facilitators to navigate the discussions across stakeholders with different or conflicting interests, in order to reach consensus and prioritize recommendations; and c) communicating policy and management responses as a result of public hearings to all stakeholders in a timely manner.

摘要

背景

泰国 2002 年《国家健康保障法案》的立法规定要求为提供者、受益人及其他利益相关者举办年度公开听证会,以改进全民健康覆盖计划(UCS)的绩效。

目的

本研究旨在探讨年度公开听证程序,评估其效果,并提出改进建议。

方法

对参与年度公开听证会的 29 名来自不同利益相关群体的主要知情人进行了深入访谈。

结果

评估结果显示,公开听证会完全符合影响政策决策的标准,部分符合适当参与方法和社会学习的标准。但是,在公开听证会参与者的包容性和代表性、信息和透明度方面还有改进的空间。

结论

提出了三项建议:a)提前通知利益相关者议程和听证程序,使他们能够积极参与;b)确定有经验的主持人,以引导不同或利益冲突的利益相关者进行讨论,以达成共识和优先考虑建议;c)及时向所有利益相关者传达公开听证的政策和管理回应。