Ohio University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701, USA.
J Nurs Manag. 2009 Nov;17(7):822-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2008.00913.x.
The aims of this study were: (1) to identify barriers to nurse/nursing aide communication and to discuss and provide solutions to some of these problems through a focus group; and (2) to determine the effectiveness of this focus group on job satisfaction-related outcomes.
Numerous studies have attributed problems with nurse staffing and turnover to faulty communication between nursing supervisors and nursing aides.
Registered nurses (RNs) (n = 2), licensed practical nurses (LPNs) (n = 10) and nursing aides (n = 19) were interviewed; narrative themes from the interviews were then used to guide focus group discussions. A job satisfaction survey in a pre-test/post-test fashion was used to test the efficacy of the focus group.
Qualitative data from the interviews highlighted: (1) anger and condescension in communication; and (2) lack of mentoring, empathy and respect. The job satisfaction survey data showed that the attitudes decreased significantly among participants in the focus group but not in the control group (P < 0.05).
Nurse supervisors, both RN and LPN, are key to educational reform and must be taught collegial methods when delegating authority.
Findings from this study can be used to develop a multidisciplinary educational tool to foster communication and collegiality, thereby reducing job turnover in nursing homes.
本研究旨在:(1) 通过焦点小组,确定护士/护理助理沟通的障碍,并讨论和提供一些解决这些问题的方法;(2) 确定该焦点小组对与工作满意度相关的结果的有效性。
许多研究将护士人员配备和人员流动问题归因于护理主管和护理助理之间沟通不畅。
对注册护士(RN)(n = 2)、执业护士(LPN)(n = 10)和护理助理(n = 19)进行了访谈;然后使用访谈中的叙事主题来指导焦点小组讨论。使用预测试/后测试的工作满意度调查来测试焦点小组的效果。
访谈的定性数据突出了以下几点:(1) 沟通中的愤怒和屈尊;(2) 缺乏指导、同理心和尊重。工作满意度调查数据显示,焦点小组参与者的态度明显下降,但对照组的态度没有下降(P < 0.05)。
护士主管,包括 RN 和 LPN,是教育改革的关键,在授权时必须教授他们同事关系的方法。
本研究的结果可用于开发多学科教育工具,以促进沟通和同事关系,从而减少养老院的护理人员流动。