Suppr超能文献

右心室功能障碍与植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗的发生率

Right ventricular dysfunction and the incidence of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapies.

作者信息

Aktas Mehmet K, Kim David D, McNitt Scott, Huang David T, Rosero Spencer Z, Hall Burr W, Zareba Wojciech, Daubert James P

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009 Dec;32(12):1501-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02507.x. Epub 2009 Sep 30.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy is well established in preventing sudden cardiac death in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. The influence of right ventricular (RV) function on ICD therapy for sudden cardiac death (SCD) is not known.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 222 patients receiving an ICD for primary prevention of SCD. Baseline clinical and echocardiographic data were gathered. RV systolic function was qualitatively assessed as normal or abnormal (described as mildly, moderately, or severely reduced). Primary endpoint was combined ICD therapy or death and secondary endpoint was ICD therapy alone.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 940 +/- 522 days. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 0.23 +/- 0.07. By Kaplan-Meier analysis, RV dysfunction was predictive of combined ICD therapy or death when comparing between normal and abnormal RV function (P = 0.008) and among qualitative ranges of RV function (P = 0.012). RV dysfunction was not predictive of ICD therapy alone with either type of classification. After adjusting for clinical covariates, severe RV dysfunction was predictive of the combined endpoint of ICD therapy or death (HR 2.02, 95% CI 1.04-3.92, P = 0.037).

CONCLUSION

Severe RV dysfunction appears to be an independent predictor of the combined endpoint of ICD therapy or death. RV dysfunction does not reliably predict the incidence of ICD therapy alone.

摘要

引言

植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)治疗在预防左心室功能不全患者的心源性猝死方面已得到充分确立。右心室(RV)功能对ICD治疗心源性猝死(SCD)的影响尚不清楚。

方法

我们回顾性研究了222例接受ICD进行SCD一级预防的患者。收集了基线临床和超声心动图数据。RV收缩功能被定性评估为正常或异常(描述为轻度、中度或重度降低)。主要终点是联合ICD治疗或死亡,次要终点是单独的ICD治疗。

结果

平均随访时间为940±522天。平均左心室射血分数为0.23±0.07。通过Kaplan-Meier分析,在比较正常和异常RV功能时(P = 0.008)以及在RV功能的定性范围内(P = 0.012),RV功能障碍可预测联合ICD治疗或死亡。RV功能障碍在两种分类中均不能单独预测ICD治疗。在调整临床协变量后,严重RV功能障碍可预测ICD治疗或死亡的联合终点(HR 2.02,95% CI 1.04 - 3.92,P = 0.037)。

结论

严重RV功能障碍似乎是ICD治疗或死亡联合终点的独立预测因素。RV功能障碍不能可靠地预测单独ICD治疗的发生率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验