Aktas Mehmet K, Kim David D, McNitt Scott, Huang David T, Rosero Spencer Z, Hall Burr W, Zareba Wojciech, Daubert James P
Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009 Dec;32(12):1501-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02507.x. Epub 2009 Sep 30.
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy is well established in preventing sudden cardiac death in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. The influence of right ventricular (RV) function on ICD therapy for sudden cardiac death (SCD) is not known.
We retrospectively studied 222 patients receiving an ICD for primary prevention of SCD. Baseline clinical and echocardiographic data were gathered. RV systolic function was qualitatively assessed as normal or abnormal (described as mildly, moderately, or severely reduced). Primary endpoint was combined ICD therapy or death and secondary endpoint was ICD therapy alone.
The mean follow-up was 940 +/- 522 days. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 0.23 +/- 0.07. By Kaplan-Meier analysis, RV dysfunction was predictive of combined ICD therapy or death when comparing between normal and abnormal RV function (P = 0.008) and among qualitative ranges of RV function (P = 0.012). RV dysfunction was not predictive of ICD therapy alone with either type of classification. After adjusting for clinical covariates, severe RV dysfunction was predictive of the combined endpoint of ICD therapy or death (HR 2.02, 95% CI 1.04-3.92, P = 0.037).
Severe RV dysfunction appears to be an independent predictor of the combined endpoint of ICD therapy or death. RV dysfunction does not reliably predict the incidence of ICD therapy alone.
植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)治疗在预防左心室功能不全患者的心源性猝死方面已得到充分确立。右心室(RV)功能对ICD治疗心源性猝死(SCD)的影响尚不清楚。
我们回顾性研究了222例接受ICD进行SCD一级预防的患者。收集了基线临床和超声心动图数据。RV收缩功能被定性评估为正常或异常(描述为轻度、中度或重度降低)。主要终点是联合ICD治疗或死亡,次要终点是单独的ICD治疗。
平均随访时间为940±522天。平均左心室射血分数为0.23±0.07。通过Kaplan-Meier分析,在比较正常和异常RV功能时(P = 0.008)以及在RV功能的定性范围内(P = 0.012),RV功能障碍可预测联合ICD治疗或死亡。RV功能障碍在两种分类中均不能单独预测ICD治疗。在调整临床协变量后,严重RV功能障碍可预测ICD治疗或死亡的联合终点(HR 2.02,95% CI 1.04 - 3.92,P = 0.037)。
严重RV功能障碍似乎是ICD治疗或死亡联合终点的独立预测因素。RV功能障碍不能可靠地预测单独ICD治疗的发生率。