Suppr超能文献

光凝术与玻璃体腔内注射曲安奈德联合治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的比较。

Comparison of photocoagulation with combined intravitreal triamcinolone for diabetic macular edema.

作者信息

Lee Ho Young, Lee Seung Yong, Park Jong Seok

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Eulji General Hospital, Eulji University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Ophthalmol. 2009 Sep;23(3):153-8. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2009.23.3.153. Epub 2009 Sep 8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy between macular laser grid (MLG) photocoagulation and MLG plus intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA; MLG+IVTA) therapy in diabetic macular edema (DME) patients.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized, clinical trial was conducted of DME patients. A total of 60 eyes (54 patients) affected by DME were observed for a minimum of 6 months. Thirty eyes of 28 patients who received MLG treatment and 30 eyes of 26 patients who received the combined MLG+IVTA treatment were included in the study. Main outcome measures were BCVA and central macular thickness (CMT) as measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT) at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment. Additionally, the authors examined retrospectively 20 eyes of 20 patients who were treated with only IVTA and compared with the 2 groups (MLG group and MLG+IVTA group).

RESULTS

Baseline BCVA was 0.53 + or - 0.32 and CMT was 513.9 + or - 55.1 microm in the MLG group. At 1 and 3 months after treatment, the MLG group showed no significant improvement of BCVA and CMT, although there was significant improvement after 6 months. In the MLG+IVTA group, the baseline BCVA was 0.59 + or - 0.29 and CMT was 498.2 + or - 19.8 microm. After treatment, significant improvement of BCVA and CMT was observed at all follow-up time periods. When comparing the MLG group with the MLG+IVTA group, the latter had better results after 1 and 3 months, although at 6 months, there was no significant difference of BCVA and CMT between the 2 groups. Additionally, the IVTA group showed more improvement than the MLG group at 1 and 3 months but showed no significant difference at 6 months. In addition, the IVTA group showed no significant difference with the MLG+IVTA group at all follow-up time periods.

CONCLUSIONS

For DME patients, the combined MLG+IVTA treatment had a better therapeutic effect than the MLG treatment for improving BCVA and CMT at the early follow-up time periods. IVTA treatment alone could be an additional alternative therapeutic option to combined therapy.

摘要

目的

比较黄斑区激光格栅(MLG)光凝术与MLG联合玻璃体内注射曲安奈德(IVTA;MLG+IVTA)治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)患者的疗效。

方法

对DME患者进行一项前瞻性、随机临床试验。共观察了60只眼(54例患者),观察时间至少6个月。研究纳入了28例接受MLG治疗患者的30只眼以及26例接受MLG+IVTA联合治疗患者的30只眼。主要观察指标为治疗后1、3和6个月时通过光学相干断层扫描(OCT)测量的最佳矫正视力(BCVA)和中心黄斑厚度(CMT)。此外,作者回顾性检查了20例仅接受IVTA治疗患者的20只眼,并与两组(MLG组和MLG+IVTA组)进行比较。

结果

MLG组的基线BCVA为0.53±0.32,CMT为513.9±55.1微米。治疗后1个月和3个月,MLG组的BCVA和CMT无显著改善,尽管6个月后有显著改善。在MLG+IVTA组中,基线BCVA为0.59±0.29,CMT为498.2±19.8微米。治疗后,在所有随访时间段均观察到BCVA和CMT有显著改善。将MLG组与MLG+IVTA组进行比较时,后者在1个月和3个月后的结果更好,尽管在6个月时,两组之间的BCVA和CMT无显著差异。此外,IVTA组在1个月和3个月时的改善比MLG组更多,但在6个月时无显著差异。此外,IVTA组在所有随访时间段与MLG+IVTA组均无显著差异。

结论

对于DME患者,在早期随访时间段,MLG+IVTA联合治疗在改善BCVA和CMT方面比MLG治疗具有更好的治疗效果。单独的IVTA治疗可能是联合治疗的另一种替代治疗选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7479/2739972/28be2ac50b2f/kjo-23-153-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验