Alexeyev Mikhail F
Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688, USA.
FEBS J. 2009 Oct;276(20):5768-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07269.x.
With the aging of the population, we are seeing a global increase in the prevalence of age-related disorders, especially in developed countries. Chronic diseases disproportionately affect the older segment of the population, contributing to disability, a diminished quality of life and an increase in healthcare costs. Increased life expectancy reflects the success of contemporary medicine, which must now respond to the challenges created by this achievement, including the growing burden of chronic illnesses, injuries and disabilities. A well-developed theoretical framework is required to understand the molecular basis of aging. Such a framework is a prerequisite for the development of clinical interventions that will constitute an efficient response to the challenge of age-related health issues. This review critically analyzes the experimental evidence that supports and refutes the Free Radical/Mitochondrial Theory of Aging, which has dominated the field of aging research for almost half a century.
随着人口老龄化,我们看到与年龄相关的疾病在全球范围内患病率上升,尤其是在发达国家。慢性病对老年人群的影响尤为严重,导致残疾、生活质量下降以及医疗成本增加。预期寿命的延长反映了当代医学的成功,而现在医学必须应对这一成就所带来的挑战,包括慢性病、损伤和残疾日益加重的负担。需要一个完善的理论框架来理解衰老的分子基础。这样一个框架是开发临床干预措施的先决条件,这些干预措施将构成对与年龄相关的健康问题挑战的有效应对。本综述批判性地分析了支持和反驳自由基/线粒体衰老理论的实验证据,该理论在衰老研究领域占据主导地位近半个世纪。