Tarczy-Hornoch Kristina
Division of Ophthalmology, Childrens Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90027, USA.
Optom Vis Sci. 2009 Dec;86(12):1337-45. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181be9d9c.
To describe a modified bell retinoscopy (MBR) method for quantifying accommodative lag in children and to assess its repeatability and comparability with other techniques.
In MBR, the target is advanced toward the patient until the retinoscopic reflex is neutralized. A "standardized 40-cm target estimate" of lag was derived for each child using data from three retinoscope distances. Within-visit repeatability was assessed in normal children 5 to 23 months of age, a heterogeneous group of clinic patients, and a group of children with Down syndrome. Clinic patients were tested on separate days for between-visit repeatability and, also, with Nott retinoscopy (NR) and the monocular estimate method (MEM) on day 2.
MBR correlated with NR (r = 0.84) and MEM (r = 0.82). MBR and NR estimates were lower than MEM for high lags. Within-visit repeatability of the standardized 40-cm target estimate of MBR in normal children and clinic patients varied with the amount of lag (p < 0.0001). The repeatability index for 0.50 D lag was 0.49 D and for 1.00 D lag it was 0.80 D. Repeatability was similar in children with Down syndrome. In clinic patients, the between-visit repeatability index for 0.50 D lag was 0.60 D for the second estimate of each day, with lower repeatability for the first measure of each day. Repeatability did not vary with age or refractive error. The decrease in repeatability with high lag may be attributable to spatial measurement error.
MBR estimates of accommodative lag correlate with traditional dynamic retinoscopy measures over a wide range of lags and show comparable repeatability. MBR may be a useful addition to the repertoire of clinical tools available for assessing accommodation in young children.
描述一种改良的检影验光法(MBR),用于量化儿童的调节滞后,并评估其与其他技术相比的可重复性和可比性。
在MBR中,将目标物向患者推进,直到检影反射被中和。利用来自三个检影镜距离的数据,为每个儿童得出调节滞后的“标准化40厘米目标估计值”。在5至23个月大的正常儿童、一组临床异质性患者以及一组唐氏综合征儿童中评估了访内重复性。临床患者在不同日期进行测试,以评估访间重复性,并且在第2天还使用诺特检影验光法(NR)和单眼估计法(MEM)进行测试。
MBR与NR(r = 0.84)和MEM(r = 0.82)相关。对于高度数的调节滞后,MBR和NR的估计值低于MEM。正常儿童和临床患者中MBR的标准化40厘米目标估计值的访内重复性随调节滞后量而变化(p < 0.0001)。0.50D调节滞后的重复性指数为0.49D,1.00D调节滞后的重复性指数为0.80D。唐氏综合征儿童的重复性相似。在临床患者中,0.50D调节滞后的访间重复性指数在每天的第二次测量中为0.60D,每天的第一次测量重复性较低。重复性不随年龄或屈光不正而变化。高调节滞后时重复性的降低可能归因于空间测量误差。
MBR对调节滞后的估计在广泛的调节滞后范围内与传统动态检影验光测量相关,并且显示出可比的可重复性。MBR可能是可用于评估幼儿调节功能的临床工具库中的一个有用补充。