Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2009;7(3):149-54. doi: 10.1007/BF03256148.
Drug benefits have responded to the rise in drug costs by increasing patient cost sharing. However, many now realize that increasing cost sharing for high-value preventive-care drugs can be detrimental in terms of reducing patient drug adherence and causing increased inpatient and outpatient costs. Value-based insurance design (VBID) deals with this by decreasing the copayments for high-value preventive-care drugs and raising copayments for drugs with less value. The Medicare Part D drug benefit in the US could benefit greatly from VBID, especially since the Part D stand-alone plans currently have no incentive to reduce inpatient and outpatient costs. While VBID will improve outcomes and avert hospitalizations, it will not result in net cost savings since high drug prices usually overwhelm any inpatient and outpatient cost offsets. Thus, for VBID to reap net cost savings, it must be combined with value-based purchasing of drugs, and it must move beyond just the lowering of copayments and increase incentives by giving rebates to patients so that they can share in the cost savings of improved drug adherence.
药物福利通过增加患者自付费用来应对药物成本的上升。然而,许多人现在意识到,增加高价值预防保健药物的自付费用可能会对降低患者药物依从性和增加住院和门诊费用产生不利影响。基于价值的保险设计(VBID)通过降低高价值预防保健药物的共付额和提高低价值药物的共付额来解决这个问题。美国的医疗保险处方药福利可以从 VBID 中大大受益,特别是因为目前独立的 Part D 计划没有降低住院和门诊费用的动力。虽然 VBID 将改善结果并避免住院治疗,但它不会带来净成本节约,因为高药价通常会抵消任何住院和门诊费用的抵消。因此,为了实现 VBID 的净成本节约,它必须与药物的基于价值的采购相结合,并且必须不仅仅通过降低共付额和通过给患者回扣来增加激励措施,以便他们能够分享药物依从性提高带来的成本节约。