Suppr超能文献

基于价值的保险设计更广泛的传播是否可以在不增加成本的情况下增加美国医疗保健的收益?来自计算机模拟模型的证据。

Can broader diffusion of value-based insurance design increase benefits from US health care without increasing costs? Evidence from a computer simulation model.

机构信息

Section of Value and Comparative Effectiveness, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS Med. 2010 Feb 16;7(2):e1000234. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000234.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evidence suggests that cost sharing (i.e.,copayments and deductibles) decreases health expenditures but also reduces essential care. Value-based insurance design (VBID) has been proposed to encourage essential care while controlling health expenditures. Our objective was to estimate the impact of broader diffusion of VBID on US health care benefits and costs.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We used a published computer simulation of costs and life expectancy gains from US health care to estimate the impact of broader diffusion of VBID. Two scenarios were analyzed: (1) applying VBID solely to pharmacy benefits and (2) applying VBID to both pharmacy benefits and other health care services (e.g., devices). We assumed that cost sharing would be eliminated for high-value services (<$100,000 per life-year), would remain unchanged for intermediate- or unknown-value services ($100,000-$300,000 per life-year or unknown), and would be increased for low-value services (>$300,000 per life-year). All costs are provided in 2003 US dollars. Our simulation estimated that approximately 60% of health expenditures in the US are spent on low-value services, 20% are spent on intermediate-value services, and 20% are spent on high-value services. Correspondingly, the vast majority (80%) of health expenditures would have cost sharing that is impacted by VBID. With prevailing patterns of cost sharing, health care conferred 4.70 life-years at a per-capita annual expenditure of US$5,688. Broader diffusion of VBID to pharmaceuticals increased the benefit conferred by health care by 0.03 to 0.05 additional life-years, without increasing costs and without increasing out-of-pocket payments. Broader diffusion of VBID to other health care services could increase the benefit conferred by health care by 0.24 to 0.44 additional life-years, also without increasing costs and without increasing overall out-of-pocket payments. Among those without health insurance, using cost saving from VBID to subsidize insurance coverage would increase the benefit conferred by health care by 1.21 life-years, a 31% increase.

CONCLUSION

Broader diffusion of VBID may amplify benefits from US health care without increasing health expenditures.

摘要

背景

有证据表明,成本分担(即共付额和自付额)可以降低医疗支出,但也会减少必要的医疗服务。基于价值的保险设计(VBID)已被提议用于鼓励提供必要的医疗服务,同时控制医疗支出。我们的目标是估计更广泛地推广 VBID 对美国医疗保健福利和成本的影响。

方法和发现

我们使用已发表的计算机模拟美国医疗保健成本和预期寿命收益来估计更广泛地推广 VBID 的影响。分析了两种情况:(1)仅将 VBID 应用于药品福利,(2)将 VBID 应用于药品福利和其他医疗服务(如设备)。我们假设对于高价值服务(每寿命年低于 100,000 美元),将取消成本分担;对于中值或未知价值服务(每寿命年 100,000-300,000 美元或未知),成本分担保持不变;对于低价值服务(每寿命年高于 300,000 美元),将增加成本分担。所有成本均以 2003 年美元计值。我们的模拟估计,美国约 60%的医疗支出用于低价值服务,20%用于中值价值服务,20%用于高价值服务。相应地,绝大多数(80%)的医疗支出将受到 VBID 影响的成本分担。在现行的成本分担模式下,医疗保健为每人每年支出 5688 美元,提供了 4.70 个寿命年。更广泛地推广 VBID 到药品会使医疗保健带来的收益增加 0.03 到 0.05 个额外的寿命年,而不会增加成本,也不会增加自付额。更广泛地推广 VBID 到其他医疗服务可以使医疗保健带来的收益增加 0.24 到 0.44 个额外的寿命年,同样不会增加成本,也不会增加总体自付额。对于没有医疗保险的人来说,使用 VBID 节省的成本来补贴保险覆盖范围,可以使医疗保健带来的收益增加 1.21 个寿命年,增加 31%。

结论

更广泛地推广 VBID 可能会扩大美国医疗保健的收益,而不会增加医疗支出。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44e7/2821897/ff353a02cb25/pmed.1000234.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验