Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Depression Center, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
J Affect Disord. 2010 May;122(3):285-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.08.018. Epub 2009 Oct 1.
Intermediate cognitive phenotypes (ICPs) are measurable and quantifiable states that may be objectively assessed in a standardized method, and can be integrated into association studies, including genetic, biochemical, clinical, and imaging based correlates. The present study used neuropsychological measures as ICPs, with factor scores in executive functioning, attention, memory, fine motor function, and emotion processing, similar to prior work in schizophrenia.
Healthy control subjects (HC, n=34) and euthymic (E, n=66), depressed (D, n=43), or hypomanic/mixed (HM, n=13) patients with bipolar disorder (BD) were assessed with neuropsychological tests. These were from eight domains consistent with previous literature; auditory memory, visual memory, processing speed with interference resolution, verbal fluency and processing speed, conceptual reasoning and set-shifting, inhibitory control, emotion processing, and fine motor dexterity.
Of the eight factor scores, the HC group outperformed the E group in three (Processing Speed with Interference Resolution, Visual Memory, Fine Motor Dexterity), the D group in seven (all except Inhibitory Control), and the HM group in four (Inhibitory Control, Processing Speed with Interference Resolution, Fine Motor Dexterity, and Auditory Memory).
The HM group was relatively small, thus effects of this phase of illness may have been underestimated. Effects of medication could not be fully controlled without a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Use of the factor scores can assist in determining ICPs for BD and related disorders, and may provide more specific targets for development of new treatments. We highlight strong ICPs (Processing Speed with Interference Resolution, Visual Memory, Fine Motor Dexterity) for further study, consistent with the existing literature.
中间认知表型(ICPs)是可测量和量化的状态,可以通过标准化方法进行客观评估,并可整合到关联研究中,包括遗传、生化、临床和影像学相关因素。本研究使用神经心理学测量作为 ICPs,采用执行功能、注意力、记忆、精细运动功能和情绪处理的因子分数,与精神分裂症的先前研究类似。
健康对照组(HC,n=34)和心境稳定(E,n=66)、抑郁(D,n=43)或轻躁狂/混合发作(HM,n=13)的双相障碍(BD)患者接受神经心理学测试。这些测试来自与先前文献一致的八个领域;听觉记忆、视觉记忆、有干扰的处理速度、言语流畅性和处理速度、概念推理和转换、抑制控制、情绪处理和精细运动灵巧性。
在八个因子分数中,HC 组在三个方面(有干扰的处理速度、视觉记忆、精细运动灵巧性)优于 E 组,D 组在七个方面(除抑制控制外的所有方面)优于 E 组,HM 组在四个方面(抑制控制、有干扰的处理速度、精细运动灵巧性和听觉记忆)优于 E 组。
HM 组相对较小,因此疾病这一阶段的影响可能被低估了。如果没有随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究,就无法完全控制药物的影响。
因子分数的使用可以帮助确定 BD 及相关障碍的 ICPs,并可能为新治疗方法的开发提供更具体的目标。我们强调了与现有文献一致的强 ICPs(有干扰的处理速度、视觉记忆、精细运动灵巧性),以供进一步研究。