Department of Psychiatry, Guangzhou Psychiatric Hospital, School of Public Health, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
J Affect Disord. 2012 Feb;136(3):328-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.11.029. Epub 2011 Dec 12.
It has been suggested that cognitive deficits existed in mood disorders. Nevertheless, whether neuropsychological profiles differ three main subtypes of mood disorder (Bipolar I, Bipolar II and UP) remain understudied because most current studies include either mixed samples of bipolar I and bipolar II patients or mixed samples of different states of the illness. The main aim of the present study is to determine whether, or to some extent, specific cognitive domains could differentiate the main subtypes of mood disorders in the depressed and clinically remitted status.
Three groups of bipolar I (n=92), bipolar II (n=131) and unipolar depression (UP) patients (n=293) were tested with a battery of neuropsychological tests both at baseline (during a depressive episode) and after 6 weeks of treatment, contrasting with 202 healthy controls on cognitive performance. The cognitive domains include processing speed, attention, memory, verbal fluency and executive function.
At the acute depressive state, the three patient groups (bipolar I, bipolar II and UP) showed cognitive dysfunction in processing speed, memory, verbal fluency and executive function but not in attention compared with controls. Post comparisons revealed that bipolar I depressed patients performed significantly worse in verbal fluency and executive function than bipolar II and UP depressed patients. No difference was found between bipolar II and UP depressed patients except for the visual memory. After 6 weeks of treatment, clinically remitted bipolar I and bipolar II patients only displayed cognitive impairment in processing speed and visual memory. Remitted UP patients showed cognitive impairment in executive function in addition to processing speed and visual memory. The three remitted patient groups scored similarly in processing speed and visual memory.
Clinically remitted patients were just recovered from a major depressive episode after 6 weeks of treatment and in relatively unstable state.
Bipolar I, bipolar II and UP patients have a similar pattern of cognitive impairment during the state of acute depressive episode, but bipolar I patients experience greater impairment than bipolar II and UP patients. In clinical remission, both bipolar and UP patients show cognitive deficits in processing speed and visual memory, and executive dysfunction might be a status-maker for bipolar disorder, but a trait-marker for UP.
有研究表明心境障碍患者存在认知缺陷。然而,三种主要心境障碍亚类(双相 I 型、双相 II 型和单相)的神经心理学特征是否存在差异仍有待研究,因为大多数现有研究包括双相 I 型和双相 II 型患者的混合样本或疾病不同状态的混合样本。本研究的主要目的是确定在抑郁和临床缓解状态下,特定的认知领域是否或在某种程度上可以区分主要的心境障碍亚型。
三组双相 I 型(n=92)、双相 II 型(n=131)和单相抑郁(UP)患者(n=293)在基线时(在抑郁发作期间)和 6 周治疗后均接受神经心理学测试,与 202 名健康对照组进行认知表现对比。认知领域包括加工速度、注意力、记忆、言语流畅性和执行功能。
在急性抑郁状态下,三组患者(双相 I 型、双相 II 型和 UP 型)在加工速度、记忆、言语流畅性和执行功能方面表现出认知功能障碍,但注意力无差异。事后比较发现,双相 I 型抑郁患者在言语流畅性和执行功能方面的表现明显差于双相 II 型和 UP 型抑郁患者。双相 II 型和 UP 型抑郁患者之间没有差异,除了视觉记忆。6 周治疗后,临床缓解的双相 I 型和双相 II 型患者仅在加工速度和视觉记忆方面存在认知障碍。缓解的 UP 型患者除了加工速度和视觉记忆外,在执行功能方面也存在认知障碍。三组缓解患者在加工速度和视觉记忆方面的评分相似。
临床缓解的患者在 6 周治疗后刚刚从重度抑郁发作中恢复过来,处于相对不稳定的状态。
在急性抑郁发作期间,双相 I 型、双相 II 型和 UP 型患者存在相似的认知障碍模式,但双相 I 型患者的损害程度大于双相 II 型和 UP 型患者。在临床缓解期,双相和 UP 型患者在加工速度和视觉记忆方面均存在认知缺陷,执行功能可能是双相障碍的状态标志物,而 UP 型是特征标志物。