• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跨越国界:影响欧洲国家戒烟干预成本效益差异的因素。

Crossing borders: factors affecting differences in cost-effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions between European countries.

机构信息

Institute for Medical Technology Assessment (iMTA), Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Value Health. 2010 Mar-Apr;13(2):230-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00612.x. Epub 2009 Sep 25.

DOI:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00612.x
PMID:19804435
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Many different factors affect the transferability of cost-effectiveness results between countries. The objective is to quantify the impact of nine potential causes of variation in cost-effectiveness of pharmacological smoking cessation therapies (SCTs) between The Netherlands (reference case), Germany, Sweden, UK, Belgium, and France.

METHODS

The life-time benefits of smoking cessation were calculated using the Benefits of Smoking Cessation on Outcomes model, following a cohort of smokers making an unaided quit attempt, or using nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), bupropion, or varenicline. We investigated the impact of between-country differences in nine factors-demography, smoking prevalence, mortality, epidemiology and costs of smoking-related diseases, resource use and unit costs of SCTs, utility weights and discount rates-on the incremental net monetary benefit (INMB), using a willingness-to-pay (WTP) of euro20,000 per quality adjusted life year (QALY).

RESULTS

The INMB of 1000 quit attempts with NRT versus unaided, varies from euro0.39 million (Germany) to euro1.47 million (France). The differences between the countries were primarily due to differences in discount rates, causing the INMB to change between -65% to +62%, incidence and mortality rates (epidemiology) of smoking-related diseases (-43% to +35%) and utility weights. Impact also depended on the WTP for a QALY and time horizon: at a low WTP or a short time horizon, the resource use and unit costs of SCTs had the highest impact on INMB.

CONCLUSIONS

Although all INMBs were positive, there were significant differences across countries. These were primarily related to choice of discount rate and epidemiology of diseases.

摘要

目的

许多不同的因素会影响成本效益结果在国家间的可转移性。本研究的目的是量化九个潜在因素对荷兰(基准案例)、德国、瑞典、英国、比利时和法国之间药物戒烟疗法(SCT)成本效益差异的影响。

方法

采用Benefits of Smoking Cessation on Outcomes 模型,计算了戒烟的终生获益,该模型随访了一组未经辅助自行戒烟者或使用尼古丁替代疗法(NRT)、安非他酮或伐伦克林的吸烟者队列。我们研究了九个因素(人口统计学、吸烟流行率、死亡率、与吸烟相关疾病的流行病学和成本、SCT 的资源利用和单位成本、效用权重和贴现率)在国家间差异对增量净货币效益(INMB)的影响,采用 20,000 欧元/QALY 的支付意愿(WTP)作为阈值。

结果

NRT 与未辅助戒烟相比,1000 次戒烟尝试的 INMB 从德国的 39 万欧元到法国的 147 万欧元不等。各国之间的差异主要归因于贴现率的差异,导致 INMB 变化幅度为-65%至+62%,与吸烟相关疾病的发病率和死亡率(流行病学)(-43%至+35%)和效用权重。影响还取决于 WTP 和时间范围:在低 WTP 或短时间范围内,SCT 的资源利用和单位成本对 INMB 的影响最大。

结论

尽管所有 INMB 均为正值,但各国之间存在显著差异。这些差异主要与贴现率选择和疾病的流行病学有关。

相似文献

1
Crossing borders: factors affecting differences in cost-effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions between European countries.跨越国界:影响欧洲国家戒烟干预成本效益差异的因素。
Value Health. 2010 Mar-Apr;13(2):230-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00612.x. Epub 2009 Sep 25.
2
Cost effectiveness of varenicline in Belgium, compared with bupropion, nicotine replacement therapy, brief counselling and unaided smoking cessation: a BENESCO Markov cost-effectiveness analysis.在比利时,与安非他酮、尼古丁替代疗法、简短咨询和无辅助戒烟相比,伐尼克兰的成本效益:一项BENESCO马尔可夫成本效益分析。
Clin Drug Investig. 2009;29(10):655-65. doi: 10.2165/11317730-000000000-00000.
3
Cost-effectiveness analysis of varenicline versus existing smoking cessation strategies in Central America and the Caribbean using the BENESCO model.使用BENESCO模型对中美洲和加勒比地区伐尼克兰与现有戒烟策略进行成本效益分析。
Hosp Pract (1995). 2012 Feb;40(1):24-34. doi: 10.3810/hp.2012.02.945.
4
Varenicline in the management of smoking cessation: a single technology appraisal.伐尼克兰在戒烟管理中的应用:一项单技术评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2009 Sep;13 Suppl 2:9-13. doi: 10.3310/hta13suppl2/02.
5
Cost-effectiveness of varenicline versus bupropion, nicotine-replacement therapy, and unaided cessation in Greece.希腊伐伦克林与安非他酮、尼古丁替代疗法和非药物戒烟的成本效益比较。
Clin Ther. 2012 Aug;34(8):1803-14. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.07.002. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
6
Cost effectiveness of varenicline versus bupropion and unaided cessation for smoking cessation in a cohort of Finnish adult smokers.在芬兰成年烟民队列中,比较伐伦克林、安非他酮与未辅助戒烟对戒烟的成本效果。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Mar;26(3):549-60. doi: 10.1185/03007990903542666.
7
Cost-effectiveness of varenicline compared with bupropion, NRT, and nortriptyline for smoking cessation in the Netherlands.在荷兰,伐尼克兰与安非他酮、尼古丁替代疗法及去甲替林相比用于戒烟的成本效益分析。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 Jan;24(1):51-61. doi: 10.1185/030079908x242917.
8
Cost analysis of varenicline versus bupropion, nicotine replacement therapy, and unaided cessation in Nicaragua.伐尼克兰与安非他酮、尼古丁替代疗法及尼加拉瓜无辅助戒烟的成本分析。
Hosp Pract (1995). 2012 Feb;40(1):35-43. doi: 10.3810/hp.2012.02.946.
9
Varenicline as compared to bupropion in smoking-cessation therapy--cost-utility results for Sweden 2003.伐尼克兰与安非他酮用于戒烟治疗的比较——2003年瑞典的成本效益结果
Respir Med. 2008 May;102(5):699-710. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2007.12.018. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
10
Cost-effectiveness of tobacco control policies in Vietnam: the case of personal smoking cessation support.越南控烟政策的成本效益:以个人戒烟支持为例。
Addiction. 2012 Mar;107(3):658-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03632.x. Epub 2011 Nov 1.

引用本文的文献

1
The transferability and validity of a population-level simulation model for the economic evaluation of interventions in diabetes: the MICADO model.用于糖尿病干预经济评估的人群水平模拟模型的可转移性和有效性:MICADO 模型。
Acta Diabetol. 2022 Jul;59(7):949-957. doi: 10.1007/s00592-022-01891-2. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
2
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Smoking Cessation Interventions in the United Kingdom Accounting for Major Neuropsychiatric Adverse Events.英国戒烟干预措施的成本效益分析:考虑主要神经精神不良事件。
Value Health. 2021 Jun;24(6):780-788. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.12.012. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
3
Quo Vadis HTA for Medical Devices in Central and Eastern Europe? Recommendations to Address Methodological Challenges.
医疗设备在中东欧的 HTA 走向何方?解决方法学挑战的建议。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jan 8;8:612410. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.612410. eCollection 2020.
4
Costs of clinical events in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in the Netherlands: A systematic review.荷兰 2 型糖尿病患者临床事件的成本:一项系统评价。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 6;14(9):e0221856. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221856. eCollection 2019.
5
A utility of model input uncertainty analysis in transferring tobacco control-related economic evidence to countries with scarce resources: results from the EQUIPT study.模型输入不确定性分析在将与烟草控制相关的经济证据转移到资源匮乏国家中的应用:来自 EQUIPT 研究的结果。
Addiction. 2018 Jun;113 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):42-51. doi: 10.1111/add.14092. Epub 2018 Jan 28.
6
Model-based economic evaluations in smoking cessation and their transferability to new contexts: a systematic review.基于模型的戒烟经济评估及其在新环境中的可转移性:一项系统综述。
Addiction. 2017 Jun;112(6):946-967. doi: 10.1111/add.13748. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
7
Use of Value of Information in Healthcare Decision Making: Exploring Multiple Perspectives.信息价值在医疗决策中的应用:探索多种视角
Pharmacoeconomics. 2016 Mar;34(3):315-22. doi: 10.1007/s40273-015-0346-z.
8
Lost productivity due to premature mortality in developed and emerging countries: an application to smoking cessation.发达国家和新兴国家因过早死亡导致的生产力损失:应用于戒烟。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Jun 25;12:87. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-87.
9
Economic evaluation of smoking-cessation therapies: a critical and systematic review of simulation models.戒烟疗法的经济评价:模拟模型的批判性和系统性回顾。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2012 Jul 1;30(7):551-64. doi: 10.2165/11590120-000000000-00000.
10
Pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation: current advances and research topics.戒烟药物治疗:当前的进展和研究课题。
CNS Drugs. 2011 May;25(5):371-82. doi: 10.2165/11590620-000000000-00000.