University of Poitiers, CeRCA, CNRS, France.
Int J Psychophysiol. 2009 Dec;74(3):236-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.09.007. Epub 2009 Oct 3.
We tested whether the effect of achievement motivation on effort is modulated by two possible factors of the motivational intensity theory (Wright and Kirby, 2001): perceived difficulty and maximally justified effort. Approach-driven (N=16) and avoidance-driven (N=16) participants were first instructed to perform a reaction time task to the best of their abilities. Next, the participants were instructed to consistently beat their performance standard established in the first condition. Approach-driven participants showed a stronger decrease of midfrequency band of heart rate variability, which was used as an index of mental effort, than avoidance-driven participants in the second instruction condition. Moreover, avoidance-driven participants showed a higher corrugator supercilii reactivity, which was used as an index of negative affects, than approach-driven participants in the second instruction condition. No difference of perceived difficulty between groups was observed. Results suggested that avoidance-driven participants developed negative affects in the second instruction condition decreasing the maximally justified effort and their level of engagement.
我们测试了成就动机对努力的影响是否受到动机强度理论(Wright 和 Kirby, 2001)的两个可能因素的调节:感知难度和最大合理努力。接近驱动型(n=16)和回避驱动型(n=16)参与者首先被要求尽力完成反应时间任务。接下来,参与者被指示在第一条件下始终超越他们的表现标准。与回避驱动型参与者相比,在第二指令条件下,接近驱动型参与者的心率变异性中频带下降幅度更大,这被用作心理努力的指标。此外,与接近驱动型参与者相比,回避驱动型参与者在第二指令条件下表现出更高的皱眉肌反应性,这被用作负面情绪的指标。两组之间没有观察到感知难度的差异。结果表明,回避驱动型参与者在第二指令条件下产生了负面情绪,从而降低了最大合理努力和他们的投入水平。