Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Epidemiology. 2009 Nov;20(6):863-71. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181ba333c.
This paper contrasts the concepts of interaction and effect modification using a series of examples. Interaction and effect modification are formally defined within the counterfactual framework. Interaction is defined in terms of the effects of 2 interventions whereas effect modification is defined in terms of the effect of one intervention varying across strata of a second variable. Effect modification can be present with no interaction; interaction can be present with no effect modification. There are settings in which it is possible to assess effect modification but not interaction, or to assess interaction but not effect modification. The analytic procedures for obtaining estimates of effect modification parameters and interaction parameters using marginal structural models are compared and contrasted. A characterization is given of the settings in which interaction and effect modification coincide.
本文通过一系列示例对比了交互作用和效应修饰的概念。交互作用和效应修饰在反事实框架内被形式化定义。交互作用被定义为两种干预措施的效果,而效应修饰则被定义为一种干预措施的效果在第二个变量的不同层上的变化。效应修饰可能存在而没有交互作用;交互作用可能存在而没有效应修饰。有些情况下,可以评估效应修饰而不是交互作用,或者评估交互作用而不是效应修饰。使用边缘结构模型获得效应修饰参数和交互作用参数估计的分析过程进行了比较和对比。给出了交互作用和效应修饰一致的条件的特征化。