• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当无法观察到事件暴露时用于估计暴露变化影响的因果推断方法综述

A Review of Causal Inference Methods for Estimating the Effects of Exposure Change When Incident Exposure Is Unobservable.

作者信息

Liu Fangyu, Duchesneau Emilie D, Lund Jennifer L, Jackson John W

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2024 Dec;11(4):185-198. doi: 10.1007/s40471-024-00343-5. Epub 2024 Feb 19.

DOI:10.1007/s40471-024-00343-5
PMID:40852468
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12369910/
Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Research questions on exposure change and health outcomes are both relevant to clinical and policy decision making for public health. Causal inference methods can help investigators answer questions about exposure change when the first or incident exposure is unobserved or not well defined. This review aims to help researchers conceive of helpful causal research questions about exposure change and understand various statistical methods for answering these questions to promote wider adoption of causal inference methods in research on exposure change outside the field of pharmacoepidemiology.

RECENT FINDINGS

Epidemiologic studies examining exposure changes face challenges that can be addressed by causal inference methods, including target trial emulation. However, their application outside the field of pharmacoepidemiology is limited.

SUMMARY

In this review, we (a) illustrate considerations in defining an exposure change and defining the total and joint effects of an exposure change, b) provide practical guidance on trial emulation design, data set-up for statistical analysis; (c) demonstrate four statistical methods that can estimate total and/or joint effects (structural conditional mean models, time-dependent matching, inverse probability weighting, and the parametric g-formula); and (d) compare the advantages and limitations of these statistical methods.

摘要

综述目的

关于暴露变化与健康结果的研究问题,对于公共卫生的临床和政策决策均具有相关性。当首次暴露或新发暴露未被观察到或定义不明确时,因果推断方法可帮助研究人员回答有关暴露变化的问题。本综述旨在帮助研究人员构思有关暴露变化的有益因果研究问题,并理解用于回答这些问题的各种统计方法,以促进因果推断方法在药物流行病学领域之外的暴露变化研究中得到更广泛的应用。

最新发现

研究暴露变化的流行病学研究面临一些可通过因果推断方法(包括目标试验模拟)解决的挑战。然而,它们在药物流行病学领域之外的应用有限。

总结

在本综述中,我们(a)阐述了在定义暴露变化以及定义暴露变化的总体和联合效应时的注意事项,(b)为试验模拟设计、统计分析的数据设置提供实用指导;(c)展示了四种可估计总体和/或联合效应的统计方法(结构条件均值模型、时间依存匹配、逆概率加权和参数化g公式);(d)比较了这些统计方法的优缺点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83fa/12369910/792718e0a148/nihms-2093282-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83fa/12369910/e96d617c2a4d/nihms-2093282-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83fa/12369910/1b27a50cec32/nihms-2093282-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83fa/12369910/792718e0a148/nihms-2093282-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83fa/12369910/e96d617c2a4d/nihms-2093282-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83fa/12369910/1b27a50cec32/nihms-2093282-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83fa/12369910/792718e0a148/nihms-2093282-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
A Review of Causal Inference Methods for Estimating the Effects of Exposure Change When Incident Exposure Is Unobservable.当无法观察到事件暴露时用于估计暴露变化影响的因果推断方法综述
Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2024 Dec;11(4):185-198. doi: 10.1007/s40471-024-00343-5. Epub 2024 Feb 19.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
4
Evidence-based toxicology: a comprehensive framework for causation.循证毒理学:因果关系的综合框架。
Hum Exp Toxicol. 2005 Apr;24(4):161-201. doi: 10.1191/0960327105ht517oa.
5
Assessing the comparative effects of interventions in COPD: a tutorial on network meta-analysis for clinicians.评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病干预措施的比较效果:面向临床医生的网状Meta分析教程
Respir Res. 2024 Dec 21;25(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-03056-x.
6
Healthcare workers' informal uses of mobile phones and other mobile devices to support their work: a qualitative evidence synthesis.医护人员非正规使用手机和其他移动设备来支持工作:定性证据综合评价。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 27;8(8):CD015705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015705.pub2.
7
Developing evidence-based guidelines for describing potential benefits and harms within patient information leaflets/sheets (PILs) that inform and do not cause harm (PrinciPILs).制定基于证据的指南,用于在患者信息单页/说明书(PrinciPILs)中描述潜在益处和危害,这些信息单页既能提供信息又不会造成伤害。
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Aug;29(43):1-20. doi: 10.3310/GJJH2402.
8
Feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness of laparoscopic versus abdominal hysterectomy for women and healthcare professionals: the LAVA trial qualitative process evaluation.腹腔镜子宫切除术与腹式子宫切除术对女性和医护人员的可行性、可接受性及适宜性:LAVA试验定性过程评估
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul 23:1-21. doi: 10.3310/GJTC1325.
9
The Lived Experience of Autistic Adults in Employment: A Systematic Search and Synthesis.成年自闭症患者的就业生活经历:系统检索与综述
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):495-509. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0114. eCollection 2024 Dec.
10
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍

本文引用的文献

1
Grace periods in comparative effectiveness studies of sustained treatments.持续治疗的比较效果研究中的宽限期。
J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2024 Jan 22;187(3):796-810. doi: 10.1093/jrsssa/qnae002. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Matching on Generalized Propensity Scores with Continuous Exposures.基于广义倾向得分匹配连续暴露因素
J Am Stat Assoc. 2024;119(545):757-772. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2022.2144737. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
3
Are Target Trial Emulations the Gold Standard for Observational Studies?目标试验模拟是观察性研究的金标准吗?
Epidemiology. 2023 Sep 1;34(5):614-618. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001636. Epub 2023 May 31.
4
Causal inference in survival analysis using longitudinal observational data: Sequential trials and marginal structural models.使用纵向观察数据进行生存分析中的因果推断:序贯试验和边际结构模型。
Stat Med. 2023 Jun 15;42(13):2191-2225. doi: 10.1002/sim.9718. Epub 2023 Apr 22.
5
MULTIPLY ROBUST ESTIMATORS OF CAUSAL EFFECTS FOR SURVIVAL OUTCOMES.生存结局因果效应的多重稳健估计量
Scand Stat Theory Appl. 2022 Sep;49(3):1304-1328. doi: 10.1111/sjos.12561. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
6
Revisiting the g-null Paradox.重新审视 g-空集悖论。
Epidemiology. 2022 Jan 1;33(1):114-120. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001431.
7
The Hazards of Period Specific and Weighted Hazard Ratios.特定时期风险和加权风险比的危害
Stat Biopharm Res. 2020 Jun 23;12(4):518-519. doi: 10.1080/19466315.2020.1755722.
8
gfoRmula: An R Package for Estimating the Effects of Sustained Treatment Strategies via the Parametric g-formula.gfoRmula:一个用于通过参数化g公式估计持续治疗策略效果的R包。
Patterns (N Y). 2020 Jun 12;1(3). doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2020.100008. Epub 2020 May 18.
9
Parametric g-formula implementations for causal survival analyses.参数 g 公式在因果生存分析中的实现。
Biometrics. 2021 Jun;77(2):740-753. doi: 10.1111/biom.13321. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
10
Matching with time-dependent treatments: A review and look forward.与时间依赖性治疗方法的匹配:综述与展望。
Stat Med. 2020 Jul 30;39(17):2350-2370. doi: 10.1002/sim.8533. Epub 2020 Apr 3.