Department of Chemical Pathology, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Biol Trace Elem Res. 2010 Aug;136(2):157-70. doi: 10.1007/s12011-009-8534-3. Epub 2009 Oct 8.
Iron (Fe) remains a commonly prescribed supplement in pregnancy. Its possible pathologic potential is either uncommonly considered or ignored. We determined the antioxidant status in pregnant women with and without Fe supplements. Fifty-eight apparently healthy pregnant women on Fe supplements were selected for the study from the antenatal clinic of the University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria. Fifty-five aged matched pregnant women who were not on Fe from various parishes of the Christ Apostolic Church, Ibadan (non-drug using Christian sect) were randomly selected as controls. Both groups were classified according to the trimesters of pregnancy. The gestational age in both pregnant women on Fe supplements and non-supplement pregnant women was similar. Fruit and vegetables consumption was higher in the supplement than in the non-supplement group (57.2% vs. 37.3%). Anthropometric indices, weight, height, and BMI, were also similar. But while the weight of the Fe supplement group decreased by nearly 3% in the third trimester, it increased by over 10% (p < 0.00) in the non-supplement group in the same period. Serum Fe level was significantly higher in the supplement than the non-supplement group (p < 0.001). In contrast, the levels of the antioxidants, ascorbic acid, copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), and bilirubin were all significantly decreased (p < 0.05, p < 0.001, p < 0.05, and p < 0.05, respectively). Uric acid level though also lower in the supplement group did not reach statistical significance (p > 0.05), while vitamin E was similar in both groups. There was relative stability of all antioxidants except uric acid, which declined from the first to the last trimester in the non-supplement group. The significantly higher Fe level in the second trimester was sustained in the third trimester though to a lesser degree (p < 0.05) and associated with significant decreases in the following antioxidant levels in the supplement group, ascorbic acid, bilirubin, Cu, and Zn (p < 0.02, p < 0.02, p < 0.02, and p < 0.001, respectively). Uric acid and vitamin E though lower in the supplement group were not significantly different. Remarkably, percentage changes between the first and third trimesters revealed that serum Fe increased by over 116% in the Fe supplement group, while it only increased by over 50% in the non-supplement group. This was associated with 23.50% decrease in ascorbate level (p < 0.003) in the supplement group, while it decreased by only 3.70% in the non-supplement group (p > 0.05). Again vitamin E decreased by 17.22% in the supplement group, while it decreased by only 7.30% in the non-supplement group during the period. Uric acid and bilirubin levels decreased by similar proportions during the period, while Zn decreased by 18.55% in the supplement group and by 14.86% in the non-supplement group. In contrast Cu increased by 7.20% in the supplement group, while it increased by only 2.96 in the non-supplement group. Additionally, all the antioxidants in the supplement group except vitamin E, viz, ascorbic acid, bilirubin, Cu, uric acid, and Zn, were significantly inversely correlated with serum Fe level (r - 0.299, p < 0.05, r - 0.278, p < 0.05, r - 0.383, p < 0.05, and r - 0.0369, p < 0.05). These data imply markedly depressed antioxidant status in the Fe supplement pregnant group with attendant oxidative stress (most probably pro-oxidant Fe-induced). This is associated with molecular and cellular damage as well as a number of pathologic and clinical correlates that underlie the exacerbation of morbidity and mortality in maternal and child populations, particularly in the developing countries. This appears to call for serious caution and prior evaluation of antioxidant and Fe status and during the use of Fe supplements in pregnancy for monitoring and prognostic purposes and to avert or ameliorate oxidative stress-induced pathologies in maternal and fetal systems.
铁(Fe)仍然是孕期常用的补充剂。它可能具有的病理潜在风险要么很少被考虑,要么被忽视。我们确定了补充 Fe 和不补充 Fe 的孕妇的抗氧化状态。
我们从尼日利亚伊巴丹大学教学医院的产前诊所选择了 58 名服用 Fe 补充剂的健康孕妇作为研究对象。从伊巴丹基督使徒教会的不同教堂中随机选择了 55 名不服用 Fe 的年龄匹配的孕妇作为对照组(不服用药物的基督教教派)。两组均按妊娠三个月进行分类。服用 Fe 补充剂的孕妇和未服用补充剂的孕妇的妊娠期相似。补充剂组的水果和蔬菜摄入量高于未补充剂组(57.2% 对 37.3%)。体重指数、体重、身高和 BMI 等人体测量指标也相似。但在第三孕期,服用 Fe 补充剂组的体重下降了近 3%,而未服用补充剂组的体重则增加了 10%以上(p<0.00)。补充剂组的血清 Fe 水平明显高于未补充剂组(p<0.001)。相反,抗氧化剂水平,如抗坏血酸、铜(Cu)、锌(Zn)和胆红素均显著降低(p<0.05,p<0.001,p<0.05 和 p<0.05,分别)。尽管尿酸水平在补充剂组也较低,但未达到统计学意义(p>0.05),而维生素 E 在两组中相似。除了尿酸,所有抗氧化剂的水平都相对稳定,尿酸在未补充剂组从第一孕期到第三孕期都有所下降。补充剂组血清 Fe 水平在第二孕期显著升高,尽管在第三孕期有所下降(p<0.05),但程度较轻,并且与以下抗氧化剂水平显著降低相关,包括抗坏血酸、胆红素、Cu 和 Zn(p<0.02,p<0.02,p<0.02 和 p<0.001,分别)。尿酸和维生素 E 虽然在补充剂组较低,但没有显著差异。值得注意的是,第一孕期和第三孕期之间的百分比变化显示,Fe 补充剂组的血清 Fe 增加了 116%以上,而未补充剂组仅增加了 50%以上。这与补充剂组抗坏血酸盐水平下降了 23.50%(p<0.003)有关,而未补充剂组仅下降了 3.70%(p>0.05)。同样,维生素 E 在补充剂组下降了 17.22%,而在未补充剂组仅下降了 7.30%。尿酸和胆红素水平在这段时间内呈相似比例下降,而 Zn 在补充剂组下降了 18.55%,在未补充剂组下降了 14.86%。相比之下,Cu 在补充剂组增加了 7.20%,而在未补充剂组仅增加了 2.96%。此外,补充剂组中的所有抗氧化剂,除了维生素 E,即抗坏血酸、胆红素、Cu、尿酸和 Zn,与血清 Fe 水平呈显著负相关(r=-0.299,p<0.05,r=-0.278,p<0.05,r=-0.383,p<0.05 和 r=-0.0369,p<0.05)。这些数据表明,Fe 补充剂孕妇的抗氧化状态明显下降,伴有氧化应激(很可能是由促氧化剂 Fe 引起的)。这与分子和细胞损伤以及许多病理和临床相关性有关,这些相关性是孕产妇人群发病率和死亡率增加的基础,尤其是在发展中国家。这似乎需要对孕期 Fe 补充剂的抗氧化剂和 Fe 状态进行认真的谨慎评估,并在使用 Fe 补充剂进行监测和预后目的时进行评估,以避免或减轻氧化应激引起的母体和胎儿系统的病理变化。