• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

系统评价:筛查结肠镜检查中根据息肉大小分布的高级别肿瘤。

Systematic review: distribution of advanced neoplasia according to polyp size at screening colonoscopy.

机构信息

"Nuovo Regina Margherita" Hospital, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Jan 15;31(2):210-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04160.x. Epub 2009 Oct 8.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04160.x
PMID:19814745
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The impact of not referring sub-centimetre polyps identified at CT colonography upon the efficacy of colorectal cancer screening remains uncertain.

AIM

To determine the distribution of advanced neoplasia according to polyp size in a screening setting.

METHODS

Published studies reporting the distribution of advanced adenomas in asymptomatic screening cohorts according to polyp size were identified by MEDLINE and EMBASE searches. Predefined outputs were the screening rates of advanced adenomas represented by diminutive (< or =5 mm), small (6-9 mm), sub-centimetre (<10 mm) and large (> or =10 mm) polyp sizes.

RESULTS

Data from four studies with 20 562 screening subjects met the primary inclusion criteria. Advanced adenomas were detected in 1155 (5.6%) subjects (95% CI = 5.3-5.9), corresponding to diminutive, small and large polyps in 4.6% (95% CI = 3.4-5.8), 7.9% (95% CI = 6.3-9.4) and 87.5% (95% CI = 86-89.4) of cases respectively. The frequency of advanced lesions among patients whose largest polyp was diminutive, small, sub-centimetre and large in size was 0.9%, 4.9%, 1.7% and 73.5% respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this systematic review, a 6-mm polyp size threshold for polypectomy referral would identify over 95% of subjects with advanced adenomas, whereas a 10-mm threshold would identify 88% of cases.

摘要

背景

CT 结肠成像检查中未检出的亚厘米大小息肉对结直肠癌筛查效果的影响尚不确定。

目的

确定筛查人群中息肉大小与高级别瘤变的分布关系。

方法

通过 MEDLINE 和 EMBASE 检索,确定了报道无症状筛查队列中根据息肉大小分布高级别腺瘤的已发表研究。预设输出为用微小(≤5mm)、小(6-9mm)、亚厘米(<10mm)和大(≥10mm)息肉大小表示的高级别腺瘤的筛查率。

结果

四项研究的 20562 例筛查对象的数据符合主要纳入标准。在 1155 例(5.6%)受试者中发现了高级别腺瘤(95%CI=5.3-5.9),分别对应于微小、小和大息肉的检出率为 4.6%(95%CI=3.4-5.8)、7.9%(95%CI=6.3-9.4)和 87.5%(95%CI=86-89.4)。最大息肉为微小、小、亚厘米和大的患者中高级病变的频率分别为 0.9%、4.9%、1.7%和 73.5%。

结论

基于这项系统评价,6mm 大小的息肉切除转诊阈值可以发现超过 95%的高级别腺瘤患者,而 10mm 大小的息肉切除转诊阈值可以发现 88%的病例。

相似文献

1
Systematic review: distribution of advanced neoplasia according to polyp size at screening colonoscopy.系统评价:筛查结肠镜检查中根据息肉大小分布的高级别肿瘤。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Jan 15;31(2):210-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04160.x. Epub 2009 Oct 8.
2
Incidence of advanced adenomas at surveillance colonoscopy in patients with a personal history of colon adenomas: a meta-analysis and systematic review.有结肠腺瘤个人病史患者在监测结肠镜检查时进展性腺瘤的发病率:一项荟萃分析和系统评价
Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Oct;64(4):614-26. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.06.057.
3
Natural history of diminutive and small colorectal polyps: a systematic literature review.微小和小的结直肠息肉的自然史:系统文献回顾。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Jun;85(6):1169-1176.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.12.014. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
4
[A systematic review of worldwide natural history models of colorectal cancer: classification, transition rate and a recommendation for developing Chinese population-specific model].[全球结直肠癌自然史模型的系统评价:分类、转变率及对构建中国人群特异性模型的建议]
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2017 Feb 10;38(2):253-260. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2017.02.024.
5
Transabdominal ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound for diagnosis of gallbladder polyps.经腹超声和内镜超声用于胆囊息肉的诊断。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 15;8(8):CD012233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012233.pub2.
6
Changing pathological diagnosis from hyperplastic polyp to sessile serrated adenoma: systematic review and meta-analysis.将病理诊断从增生性息肉改为无蒂锯齿状腺瘤:系统评价与荟萃分析
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Dec;29(12):1327-1331. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000994.
7
Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review.经串联结肠镜检查确定的息肉漏诊率:一项系统评价
Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Feb;101(2):343-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00390.x.
8
Artificial intelligence for reducing missed detection of adenomas and polyps in colonoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.人工智能用于减少结肠镜检查中腺瘤和息肉的漏诊:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2025 Jun 7;31(21):105753. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i21.105753.
9
Polyp detection with colonoscopy assisted by the GI Genius artificial intelligence endoscopy module compared with standard colonoscopy in routine colonoscopy practice (COLO-DETECT): a multicentre, open-label, parallel-arm, pragmatic randomised controlled trial.基于 GI Genius 人工智能内镜模块的结肠镜辅助下息肉检测与常规结肠镜检查比较(COLO-DETECT):一项多中心、开放标签、平行臂、实用随机对照试验。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Oct;9(10):911-923. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00161-4. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
10
CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting.CT结肠成像在检测结直肠息肉和癌症中的应用:系统评价、荟萃分析及研究水平报告的建议最小数据集
Radiology. 2005 Dec;237(3):893-904. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2373050176.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of cold snare polypectomy for outpatient treatment of sessile polyps smaller than 10mm.冷圈套息肉切除术门诊治疗10mm以下无蒂息肉的疗效及安全性
BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 Sep 2;25(1):631. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-04245-8.
2
Interobserver Agreement for the Paris Classification of Colorectal Lesions Amongst Surgeons, Gastroenterologists, Trainees and Experts: A Video-Based Study.外科医生、胃肠病学家、实习生和专家对结直肠病变巴黎分类的观察者间一致性:一项基于视频的研究
Dig Dis Sci. 2025 Jul 24. doi: 10.1007/s10620-025-09215-4.
3
Dysplasia and Malignancy in Colonic Polyps: Preparing for a Resect and Discard Strategy in Canada.
结肠息肉的发育异常与恶性病变:为加拿大的切除并丢弃策略做准备。
JGH Open. 2025 Mar 18;9(3):e70113. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.70113. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
Impact of contrast dye submucosal pre-lifting on cold snare resection of small polyps: an Italian randomized observational trial.对比染料黏膜下预抬举对小息肉冷圈套切除术的影响:一项意大利随机观察性试验
Clin Endosc. 2025 Mar;58(2):291-302. doi: 10.5946/ce.2024.113. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
5
Polyp size measurement during colonoscopy using a virtual scale: variability and systematic differences.使用虚拟标尺在结肠镜检查期间测量息肉大小:变异性和系统差异
Endoscopy. 2025 Feb;57(2):137-145. doi: 10.1055/a-2371-3693. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
6
Usefulness of magnifying endoscopy for diagnosis of sessile serrated lesion with dysplasia or carcinoma: Large retrospective study.放大内镜在诊断伴发育异常或癌的无蒂锯齿状病变中的应用:大型回顾性研究
Endosc Int Open. 2024 Jul 10;12(7):E895-E904. doi: 10.1055/a-2337-3944. eCollection 2024 Jul.
7
[Colorectal cancer screening with virtual colonography].[虚拟结肠镜检查用于结直肠癌筛查]
Radiologie (Heidelb). 2024 Jun;64(6):471-478. doi: 10.1007/s00117-024-01321-0. Epub 2024 May 13.
8
Natural History of Colorectal Polyps Undergoing Longitudinal in Vivo CT Colonography Surveillance.结直肠息肉行 CT 结肠成像纵向体内监测的自然史。
Radiology. 2024 Jan;310(1):e232078. doi: 10.1148/radiol.232078.
9
Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Optical Diagnosis: A Comprehensive Review of Its Role in Leave-In-Situ and Resect-and-Discard Strategies in Colonoscopy.人工智能辅助光学诊断:在结肠镜检查中留取原位和切除丢弃策略中的作用综述。
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2023 Oct 1;14(10):e00640. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000640.
10
Advances in artificial intelligence and computer science for computer-aided diagnosis of colorectal polyps: current status.用于结直肠息肉计算机辅助诊断的人工智能与计算机科学进展:现状
Endosc Int Open. 2023 Aug 16;11(8):E752-E767. doi: 10.1055/a-2098-1999. eCollection 2023 Aug.