• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

时机对安氏II类错牙合一期不拔牙矫治效果的影响。

Effect of timing on the outcomes of 1-phase nonextraction therapy of Class II malocclusion.

作者信息

Baccetti Tiziano, Franchi Lorenzo, Kim Ludia H

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Oct;136(4):501-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.08.029.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.08.029
PMID:19815151
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this cephalometric study was to evaluate the role of timing in relation to skeletal maturity on the outcomes of nonextraction comprehensive Class II therapy.

METHODS

Three samples of patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion were treated with headgear combined with fixed appliances and Class II elastics. Lateral cephalograms were taken of all subjects before therapy (T1) and at an average interval of 6 months after therapy (T2). The first sample (23 subjects) was treated before the pubertal growth spurt, the second sample (24 subjects) received therapy during the pubertal growth spurt, and the third sample (13 subjects) was treated at a postpubertal stage of development. The average T1 to T2 interval was approximately 30 months for all patients, with an average treatment duration of 24 months. Longitudinal observations of a group of 17 subjects with untreated Class II malocclusions were compared with the treated groups at the 3 skeletal maturation intervals with nonparametric statistics.

RESULTS

Class II treatment before or during the pubertal growth spurt induced significant favorable skeletal changes (restricted maxillary advancement in prepubertal patients and enhanced mandibular growth in pubertal patients). Patients treated after the pubertal growth spurt had only significant dentoalveolar changes.

CONCLUSIONS

The greatest amount of dentoskeletal correction of Class II malocclusion with 1-phase nonextraction treatment occurred in patients treated during the pubertal growth spurt.

摘要

引言

本头影测量研究的目的是评估在骨骼成熟度方面的治疗时机对非拔牙综合II类错颌畸形治疗效果的作用。

方法

选取三组安氏II类1分类错颌畸形患者,采用口外弓联合固定矫治器及II类牵引橡皮圈进行治疗。在治疗前(T1)及治疗后平均每6个月(T2)对所有受试者拍摄头颅侧位片。第一组样本(23名受试者)在青春期生长高峰前接受治疗,第二组样本(24名受试者)在青春期生长高峰期间接受治疗,第三组样本(13名受试者)在青春期后发育阶段接受治疗。所有患者从T1到T2的平均间隔约为30个月,平均治疗时间为24个月。采用非参数统计方法,将一组17名未经治疗的安氏II类错颌畸形患者的纵向观察结果与在三个骨骼成熟阶段接受治疗的组进行比较。

结果

在青春期生长高峰前或期间进行II类错颌畸形治疗可引起显著的有利骨骼变化(青春期前患者上颌前突受限,青春期患者下颌生长增强)。在青春期生长高峰后接受治疗的患者仅有显著的牙牙槽变化。

结论

采用一期非拔牙治疗方法对II类错颌畸形进行的最大量牙-骨矫正发生在青春期生长高峰期间接受治疗的患者中。

相似文献

1
Effect of timing on the outcomes of 1-phase nonextraction therapy of Class II malocclusion.时机对安氏II类错牙合一期不拔牙矫治效果的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Oct;136(4):501-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.08.029.
2
Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: a double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty.两种综合II类错颌治疗方案的比较,包括粘结式Herbst矫治器和头帽矫治器:对青春期连续接受治疗患者的双盲研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Jun;135(6):698.e1-10; discussion 698-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.03.015.
3
Early vs late orthodontic treatment of deepbite: a prospective clinical trial in growing subjects.早期与晚期矫治深覆合:生长发育期患者的前瞻性临床研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 Jul;142(1):75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.02.024.
4
Mechanism of Class II correction in prepubertal and postpubertal patients with Twin Force Bite Corrector.双力咬位矫正器矫治替牙期和恒牙期安氏Ⅱ类错[牙合]的机制。
Angle Orthod. 2013 Jul;83(4):718-27. doi: 10.2319/090412-709.1. Epub 2012 Nov 29.
5
Treating Class II malocclusion in children. Vertical skeletal effects of high-pull or low-pull headgear during comprehensive orthodontic treatment and retention.儿童安氏II类错颌畸形的治疗。综合正畸治疗及保持期间高位或低位牵引头帽的垂直骨骼效应。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2015 May;18(2):86-95. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12062. Epub 2014 Dec 29.
6
Is bodily advancement of the lower incisors possible?下切牙的生理性前移是否可行?
Eur J Orthod. 2009 Aug;31(4):425-31. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn114. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
7
Mandibular changes in persons with untreated and treated Class II division 1 malocclusion.未经治疗和已治疗的安氏II类1分类错牙合患者的下颌变化。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 Jun;113(6):661-73. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70227-6.
8
Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.成人上颌牙牙槽骨前突患者使用骨锚固与口外锚固治疗效果的比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Nov;134(5):615-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.12.022.
9
Treatment timing of MARA and fixed appliance therapy of Class II malocclusion.MARA 治疗时机与安氏Ⅱ类错牙合固定矫治治疗。
Eur J Orthod. 2013 Jun;35(3):394-400. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjs023. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
10
Midpalatal miniscrews and high-pull headgear for anteroposterior and vertical anchorage control: cephalometric comparisons of treatment changes.中 palate 微型植入钉和高拉头帽用于前后向和垂直支抗控制:治疗变化的头影测量比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Aug;144(2):238-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.03.020.

引用本文的文献

1
Case Report: Managing Odontoma and Molar-Incisor-Hypomineralization Challenges in Orthodontics.病例报告:正畸治疗中牙瘤与磨牙-切牙矿化不全问题的处理
F1000Res. 2025 Feb 20;13:970. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.154672.2. eCollection 2024.
2
Evaluation of mandibular growth in a prepubertal Class I and Class II population: a longitudinal analysis.评价青春前期 I 类和 II 类错颌人群的下颌生长:一项纵向分析。
Eur J Orthod. 2024 Apr 1;46(2). doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjae014.
3
Cephalometric comparison of mandibular growth in Brazilian children with Class II malocclusion and normal occlusion during the growth stages determined by the cervical vertebrae maturation.
颈椎成熟度确定的生长阶段中,巴西骨性 II 类错颌与正常颌儿童下颌生长的头影测量比较。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2023 Nov 3;28(5):e232358. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.28.5.e232358.oar. eCollection 2023.
4
Machine Learning Predictive Model as Clinical Decision Support System in Orthodontic Treatment Planning.机器学习预测模型作为正畸治疗计划中的临床决策支持系统
Dent J (Basel). 2022 Dec 20;11(1):1. doi: 10.3390/dj11010001.
5
Invisalign treatment with mandibular advancement: A retrospective cohort cephalometric appraisal.下颌前伸的隐适美治疗:一项回顾性队列头影测量评估。
J Clin Imaging Sci. 2022 Jul 29;12:42. doi: 10.25259/JCIS_64_2022. eCollection 2022.
6
Occlusal plane rotation and orthodontic decompensation: influence on the outcome of surgical correction of class III malocclusion.咬合平面旋转与正畸代偿:对Ⅲ类错牙合畸形手术矫治效果的影响
J Orofac Orthop. 2023 Nov;84(6):373-383. doi: 10.1007/s00056-022-00379-6. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
7
Attractiveness of the facial profile: comparison of Class II patients treated with Twin Force® or intermaxillary elastics.面型吸引力:用 Twin Force® 或颌间橡皮圈治疗的 II 类患者的比较。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2021 Oct 15;26(5):e212014. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.26.5.e212014.oar. eCollection 2021.
8
The cross-sectional effects of ribbon arch wires on Class II malocclusion intermaxillary traction: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.弓丝的横截面积对安氏 II 类错(牙合)颌间牵引的影响:三维有限元分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Oct 6;21(1):501. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01859-8.
9
Salivary alkaline phosphatase activity and chronological age as indicators for skeletal maturity.唾液碱性磷酸酶活性和年龄与骨骼成熟度的关系。
Angle Orthod. 2019 Jul;89(4):637-642. doi: 10.2319/030918-197.1. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
10
Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children and adolescents.儿童和青少年上前牙突出(安氏II类错牙合)的正畸治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 13;3(3):CD003452. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003452.pub4.