Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, Japan.
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2009 Dec;39(12):813-9. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyp105. Epub 2009 Oct 7.
To assess compliance with the radiotherapy protocol of a multi-institutional prospective study (JAROG0401/JROSG04-2), which investigated the efficacy and toxicity of definitive radiotherapy using high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy (HDR-ICBT) for early-stage uterine cervical cancer patients.
Individual case reviews (ICRs) were performed on all 60 study participants. Radiotherapy data were submitted to the quality assurance (QA) committee, which performed ICRs on 16 QA items according to previously selected criteria. The items focused on quality of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), HDR-ICBT and both. Each item was determined to be either acceptable or a deviation. The QA committee performed ICR three times as planned, two during the patient accrual and the final one just after the final patient accrued. The QA results of the first and second reviews were reported back to the investigators after each ICR.
In 40 cases (67%), all 16 QA items were classified as acceptable. One deviation was found in 16 cases, two deviations were identified in 3 cases and three deviations were noted in 1 case. The most frequently observed deviation was missing the rules for determining point A (10 cases). The items described by quantitative values, such as prescribed doses, certain time intervals and overall treatment time, were well followed. The proportion of deviations gradually decreased during the ICR process.
The present ICR demonstrated the favorable radiotherapy compliance with the JAROG0401/JROSG04-2 protocol. The QA process using ICRs can potentially be used to improve the quality of radiotherapy, including HDR-ICBT in the multi-institutional prospective studies for cervical cancer.
评估多机构前瞻性研究(JAROG0401/JROSG04-2)放疗方案的依从性,该研究旨在调查早期宫颈癌患者采用高剂量率腔内近距离放疗(HDR-ICBT)进行根治性放疗的疗效和毒性。
对所有 60 名研究参与者进行个体病例回顾(ICR)。放疗数据提交给质量保证(QA)委员会,该委员会根据先前选定的标准对 16 项 QA 项目进行 ICR。这些项目侧重于外照射放疗(EBRT)、HDR-ICBT 及其两者的质量。每个项目都被确定为可接受或偏差。QA 委员会按计划进行了三次 ICR,两次在患者入组期间,最后一次在最后一名患者入组后。第一次和第二次 ICR 后,QA 结果报告给研究人员。
在 40 例(67%)中,所有 16 项 QA 项目均被归类为可接受。在 16 例中发现 1 项偏差,在 3 例中发现 2 项偏差,在 1 例中发现 3 项偏差。最常见的偏差是遗漏了确定 A 点的规则(10 例)。对于规定剂量、某些时间间隔和总治疗时间等定量值的项目,遵循情况良好。在 ICR 过程中,偏差的比例逐渐降低。
本 ICR 表明,该研究对 JAROG0401/JROSG04-2 方案的放疗依从性良好。使用 ICR 的 QA 过程可能有助于提高放疗质量,包括宫颈癌多机构前瞻性研究中的 HDR-ICBT。