Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, University of the Ryukyus, 207 Uehara, Nishihara-cho, Okinawa, 903-0215, Japan.
Int J Clin Oncol. 2011 Aug;16(4):379-86. doi: 10.1007/s10147-011-0196-4. Epub 2011 Feb 18.
To assess radiotherapy protocol compliance in a multi-institutional phase II study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced cancer of the uterine cervix (JGOG1066).
For study protocol development, various radiotherapy parameters were examined and consensus was reached by Japanese radiation oncologists with cervical cancer treatment expertise. Quality assurance (QA) was also discussed and included in the protocol. A credentialing process was used to select institutions for participation in the study. Individual case reviews referring to 18 QA items were undertaken for each patient. Radiotherapy data were submitted to the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group (JGOG) data center and reviewed by the members of the radiotherapy committee. The QA evaluation was classed as per protocol, deviation, and violation.
Individual case reviews were performed on 69 of 72 patients entered in the study. In 24 patients (35%), there were no deviations for any QA items. There were also no deviations seen for 5 of the 18 items in 69 patients evaluated. Deviations of 64 QA items were seen in 45 cases, and violations were seen in 4 cases (4 items). The most common deviation concerned appropriate application for the external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) boost to involved nodes or parametrium (32 cases). The 4 violations were identified in the QA items regarding high-dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy.
Radiotherapy protocol compliance was favorable except for the EBRT boost indications. The results of this study validate the quality of radiotherapy in JGOG1066, and indicate that the final analysis will provide meaningful results.
为评估多机构同步放化疗治疗局部晚期宫颈癌的 II 期 JGOG1066 临床试验中放疗方案的依从性。
为制定研究方案,日本放射肿瘤学家对各种放疗参数进行了检查,并就质量保证(QA)达成共识并纳入方案。还讨论了资格认证程序,并选择了参与该研究的机构。对每个患者进行了 18 项 QA 项目的个别病例审查。放疗数据提交给日本妇科肿瘤学组(JGOG)数据中心,由放疗委员会成员进行审查。QA 评估分为符合方案、偏差和违规。
对入组的 72 例患者中的 69 例进行了个别病例审查。24 例(35%)患者在任何 QA 项目中均无偏差。在 69 例患者中,有 5 例患者的 18 项 QA 项目中无偏差。在 45 例患者中观察到 64 项 QA 项目的偏差,在 4 例患者中观察到 4 项违规。最常见的偏差涉及适当地将外部束放疗(EBRT)增敏剂量应用于受累淋巴结或宫旁组织(32 例)。4 项违规发生在高剂量率腔内近距离放疗的 QA 项目中。
除了 EBRT 增敏剂量的适应证外,放疗方案的依从性良好。这项研究的结果验证了 JGOG1066 中放疗的质量,并表明最终分析将提供有意义的结果。