Gaffney David K, Du Bois Andreas, Narayan Kailash, Reed Nick, Toita Takafumi, Pignata Sandro, Blake Peter, Portelance Lorraine, Sadoyze Azmat, Pötter Richard, Colombo Alessandro, Randall Marcus, Mirza Mansoor R, Trimble Edward L
Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Jun 1;68(2):485-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.12.013. Epub 2007 Mar 2.
The aim of this study was to describe radiotherapeutic practice of the treatment of cervical cancer in member groups of the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG).
A survey was developed and distributed to the members of the GCIG focusing on details of radiotherapy practice. Different scenarios were queried including advanced cervical cancer, postoperative patients, and para-aortic-positive lymph node cases. Items focused on indications for radiation therapy, radiation fields, dose, use of chemotherapy, brachytherapy and others. The cooperative groups from North America were compared with the other groups to evaluate potential differences in radiotherapy doses.
A total of 39 surveys were returned from 13 different cooperative groups. For the treatment of advanced cervical cancer, external beam pelvic doses and total doses to point A were 47 + 3.5 Gy (mean + SD) and 79.1 + 7.9 Gy, respectively. Point A doses were not different between the North American cooperative groups compared with the others (p = 0.103). All groups used concomitant chemotherapy, with 30 of 36 respondents using weekly cisplatin. Of 33 respondents, 31 intervened for a low hemoglobin level. For a para-aortic field, the upper border was most commonly (15 of 24) at the T12-L1 interspace. Maintenance chemotherapy (after radiotherapy) was not performed by 68% of respondents. For vaginal brachytherapy after hysterectomy, 23 groups performed HDR brachytherapy and four groups used LDR brachytherapy. In the use of brachytherapy, there was no uniformity in dose prescription.
Radiotherapy practices among member groups of the GCIG are similar in terms of both doses and use of chemotherapy.
本研究旨在描述妇科肿瘤协作组(GCIG)成员组中宫颈癌的放射治疗实践。
开展了一项调查并分发给GCIG成员,重点关注放射治疗实践的细节。询问了不同的情况,包括晚期宫颈癌、术后患者和主动脉旁淋巴结阳性病例。项目重点关注放射治疗的适应症、放射野、剂量、化疗的使用、近距离放射治疗等。将北美协作组与其他组进行比较,以评估放射治疗剂量的潜在差异。
共收到来自13个不同协作组的39份调查问卷。对于晚期宫颈癌的治疗,盆腔外照射剂量和A点总剂量分别为47 + 3.5 Gy(均值 + 标准差)和79.1 + 7.9 Gy。与其他组相比,北美协作组的A点剂量无差异(p = 0.103)。所有组均使用同步化疗,36名受访者中有30名使用每周一次的顺铂。33名受访者中,31名对血红蛋白水平低进行了干预。对于主动脉旁野,上边界最常见于T12-L1间隙(24例中有15例)。68%的受访者未进行维持化疗(放疗后)。对于子宫切除术后的阴道近距离放射治疗,23个组采用高剂量率近距离放射治疗,4个组采用低剂量率近距离放射治疗。在近距离放射治疗的使用中,剂量处方没有统一标准。
GCIG成员组之间的放射治疗实践在剂量和化疗使用方面相似。