RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138, USA.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010 Feb 1;107(1):62-8. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.09.008. Epub 2009 Oct 9.
A growing literature on adolescent drug treatment interventions demonstrates the efficacy of "research therapies," but few rigorous studies examine the effectiveness of community-based treatments that are more commonly available to and utilized by youths and their families, the criminal justice system and other referring agencies. Even less is known about the long-term effects of these community-based treatments. This study evaluates the effects 72-102 months after intake to a widely disseminated community-based treatment model, residential therapeutic community treatment, using data from RAND's Adolescent Outcomes Project. Weighting is used to control for pre-existing differences between adolescent probationers disposed to Phoenix Academy and those assigned to one of six alternative group homes serving as the comparison conditions. Although Phoenix Academy therapeutic community treatment had positive effects on substance use and psychological functioning during the first 12 months following intake, we find no evidence of positive long-term effects on 16 outcomes measuring substance use and problems, criminal activity, institutionalization, psychological functioning and general functioning. We discuss the implications of these findings and the failure to maintain the effects observed during the first year follow-up.
越来越多的青少年药物治疗干预文献证明了“研究疗法”的疗效,但很少有严格的研究来检验更常见于青少年及其家庭、刑事司法系统和其他转介机构使用的基于社区的治疗方法的有效性。关于这些基于社区的治疗方法的长期效果,人们知之甚少。本研究使用 RAND 青少年结果项目的数据,评估了广泛传播的基于社区的治疗模式——住宿治疗社区治疗——在入组后 72-102 个月的效果。通过加权来控制青少年缓刑犯被分配到凤凰学院和被分配到六个替代团体之家的比较条件之间的预先存在的差异。尽管凤凰学院治疗社区治疗在入组后 12 个月内对药物使用和心理功能有积极影响,但我们没有发现对 16 项衡量药物使用和问题、犯罪活动、监禁、心理功能和一般功能的结果有积极的长期影响。我们讨论了这些发现的意义以及未能维持第一年随访期间观察到的效果。