Black Dorothy M, Rankin Shelley C, King Lesley G
Departments of Clinical Studies, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio). 2009 Oct;19(5):489-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-4431.2009.00463.x.
Describe antimicrobial therapy and aerobic bacteriologic culture patterns in canine intensive care unit (ICU) patients in a university hospital.
Retrospective descriptive.
A tertiary university referral hospital.
Seventy-four canine ICU patients.
From January to June 2006 patient antimicrobial use, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) results, and clinical data were recorded. Appropriate antimicrobial use was analyzed relative to the time of culture submission and MIC results.
Mean+/-SD age was 7.2+/-4.2 years. Median (range) length of ICU and hospital stays were 3 days (1-25 d) and 4 days (1-27 d), respectively. A total of 106 cultures were submitted; 47 of 106 (44%) cultures were positive for 70 isolates, including Escherichia coli (16/70 [23%]), Staphylococcus intermedius (7/70 [10%]), and Acinetobacter baumannii (5/70 [7%]). A multidrug resistant pattern occurred in 19 of 70 (27%) isolates, and was significantly more likely after 48 hours of hospitalization (P<0.001). Antimicrobials were administered before culture submission in 42 of 74 dogs (57%) and included enrofloxacin (23/42 [55%]), ampicillin (20/42 [48%]), and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (8/42 [19%]). Antimicrobial choices were appropriate 19% of the time. While pending culture results, antimicrobials were administered to 67 of 72 (94%) dogs remaining alive, and were appropriate 75% of the time. The most common antimicrobials administered while awaiting culture results were ampicillin (52/67 [78%]), enrofloxacin (49/67 [73%]), and amikacin (9/67 [13%]). Post-MIC antimicrobials were appropriate 89% of the time. Of 45 dogs remaining alive, 17 (37%) continued to receive antimicrobials despite negative cultures.
Antimicrobial use was extensive in this patient population, but when available, MIC results were used to guide antimicrobial therapy. Many patients with negative cultures continued to receive antimicrobial therapy. Multidrug resistant bacteria were more likely in cultures taken after 48 hours of hospitalization.
描述一所大学医院犬重症监护病房(ICU)患者的抗菌治疗及需氧菌培养模式。
回顾性描述研究。
一所三级大学转诊医院。
74例犬ICU患者。
记录2006年1月至6月患者的抗菌药物使用情况、最低抑菌浓度(MIC)结果及临床数据。根据培养送检时间和MIC结果分析抗菌药物的合理使用情况。
平均±标准差年龄为7.2±4.2岁。ICU住院时间和医院住院时间的中位数(范围)分别为3天(1 - 25天)和4天(1 - 27天)。共送检106份培养标本;106份中的47份(44%)培养阳性,分离出70株菌,包括大肠杆菌(16/70 [23%])、中间葡萄球菌(7/70 [10%])和鲍曼不动杆菌(5/70 [7%])。70株分离菌中有19株(27%)呈现多重耐药模式,且在住院48小时后出现的可能性显著更高(P<0.001)。74只犬中有42只(57%)在送检培养标本前就已使用抗菌药物,其中包括恩诺沙星(23/42 [55%])、氨苄西林(20/42 [48%])和阿莫西林/克拉维酸(8/42 [19%])。抗菌药物选择的合理性为19%。在等待培养结果期间,72只存活犬中有67只(94%)使用了抗菌药物,合理性为75%。等待培养结果期间最常使用的抗菌药物为氨苄西林(52/67 [78%])、恩诺沙星(49/67 [73%])和阿米卡星(9/67 [13%])。根据MIC结果使用抗菌药物的合理性为89%。45只存活犬中,17只(37%)尽管培养结果为阴性仍继续接受抗菌药物治疗。
该患者群体抗菌药物使用广泛,但在有MIC结果时,会用于指导抗菌治疗。许多培养结果为阴性的患者仍继续接受抗菌治疗。住院48小时后培养出的细菌更可能为多重耐药菌。