• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结构化沟通:运用SBAR提升患者安全

Structured communication: improving patient safety with SBAR.

作者信息

Dunsford Jennifer

机构信息

Grace Hospital, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

出版信息

Nurs Womens Health. 2009 Oct;13(5):384-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-486X.2009.01456.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1751-486X.2009.01456.x
PMID:19821914
Abstract

The Institute of Medicine (1999) has estimated that as many as 98,000 people die in U.S. hospitals each year due to preventable medical errors. The Joint Commission (2004) reports that 72 percent of root causes identified during the reviews of sentinel events related to infant death and injury during delivery are attributable to communication failures. As a result, the Joint Commission (2008) has identified effective communication as one of its National Patient Safety Goals. Communication tools like SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment and Recommendation) can help nurses focus communication to improve the effectiveness of information transfer. SBAR is especially important in urgent or high-acuity situations where clear and effective interpersonal communication is critical to patient outcomes.

摘要

医学研究所(1999年)估计,在美国医院每年有多达98,000人死于可预防的医疗差错。联合委员会(2004年)报告称,在对分娩期间婴儿死亡和受伤的警讯事件审查中确定的根本原因,有72%可归因于沟通失误。因此,联合委员会(2008年)已将有效的沟通确定为其国家患者安全目标之一。诸如SBAR(情况、背景、评估和建议)之类的沟通工具可以帮助护士集中沟通,以提高信息传递的有效性。SBAR在紧急或高急症情况下尤为重要,在这些情况下,清晰有效的人际沟通对患者的治疗结果至关重要。

相似文献

1
Structured communication: improving patient safety with SBAR.结构化沟通:运用SBAR提升患者安全
Nurs Womens Health. 2009 Oct;13(5):384-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-486X.2009.01456.x.
2
Using SBAR to improve communication in interprofessional rehabilitation teams.运用SBAR改善跨专业康复团队中的沟通。
J Interprof Care. 2010 Jan;24(1):111-4. doi: 10.3109/13561820902881601.
3
Communication: patient safety and the nursing work environment.沟通:患者安全与护理工作环境
Tar Heel Nurse. 2007 Apr-Jun;69(2):6-7.
4
Improving communication among healthcare providers: preparing student nurses for practice.改善医疗服务提供者之间的沟通:让实习护士为临床实践做好准备。
Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2008;5:Article40. doi: 10.2202/1548-923X.1647. Epub 2008 Oct 21.
5
Improving clinical communication through structured conversation.通过结构化对话改善临床沟通。
Nurs Econ. 2006 Sep-Oct;24(5):268-71.
6
Effectiveness of an Adapted SBAR Communication Tool for a Rehabilitation Setting.一种适用于康复环境的SBAR沟通工具的有效性。
Healthc Q. 2008;11(3 Spec No.):72-9. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2008.19653.
7
Implementing handoff communication.实施交接沟通。
J Nurses Staff Dev. 2011 May-Jun;27(3):128-35. doi: 10.1097/NND.0b013e318217b3dd.
8
A leadership initiative to improve communication and enhance safety.一项旨在改善沟通与加强安全的领导力倡议。
Am J Med Qual. 2011 May-Jun;26(3):206-11. doi: 10.1177/1062860610387410. Epub 2011 Jan 11.
9
Update on the National Patient Safety Goals - changes for 2006.国家患者安全目标更新——2006年的变化
J Trauma Nurs. 2005 Jul-Sep;12(3):83-5.
10
Poor communication: root of most patient safety ills.沟通不畅:多数患者安全问题的根源。
Hosp Peer Rev. 2004 Dec;29(12):167-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of SBAR-based simulation programs for nursing students: a systematic review.基于 SBAR 的模拟方案对护理学生的有效性:系统评价。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jul 14;23(1):507. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04495-8.
2
Efficacy of a blended learning programme in enhancing the communication skill competence and self-efficacy of nursing students in conducting clinical handovers: a randomised controlled trial.混合式学习方案对提高护理学生临床交接沟通技能和自我效能感的效果:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Apr 13;22(1):275. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03361-3.
3
SBAR-LA: SBAR Brief Assessment Rubric for Learner Assessment.
SBAR-LA:学习者评估的 SBAR 简要评估量表。
MedEdPORTAL. 2021 Oct 18;17:11184. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11184. eCollection 2021.
4
A guide to cranial nerve testing for musculoskeletal clinicians.肌骨系统临床医生颅神经检查指南。
J Man Manip Ther. 2021 Dec;29(6):376-389. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2021.1937813. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
5
Rural family physician perspectives on communication with urban specialists: a qualitative study.农村家庭医生与城市专家沟通的观点:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 13;11(5):e043470. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043470.
6
COVID-19 cardiac arrest management: A review for emergency clinicians.COVID-19 相关心搏骤停的管理:急诊临床医生的综述。
Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Dec;38(12):2693-2702. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.08.011. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
7
Impact of the communication and patient hand-off tool SBAR on patient safety: a systematic review.沟通与患者交接工具SBAR对患者安全的影响:一项系统综述
BMJ Open. 2018 Aug 23;8(8):e022202. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022202.
8
Improving junior doctor handover between jobs.改善初级医生岗位交接情况。
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2014 Sep 19;3(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u201125.w713. eCollection 2014.
9
Effect of High-Fidelity Simulation on Medical Students' Knowledge about Advanced Life Support: A Randomized Study.高保真模拟对医学生高级生命支持知识的影响:一项随机研究。
PLoS One. 2015 May 8;10(5):e0125685. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125685. eCollection 2015.
10
Handoff quality for obstetrical inpatients varies depending on time of day and provider type.产科住院患者的交接班质量因时间和医护人员类型而异。
J Reprod Med. 2014 Mar-Apr;59(3-4):95-102.