• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Promoting chlamydia screening with posters and leaflets in general practice--a qualitative study.在全科医疗中使用海报和传单推广衣原体筛查——一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2009 Oct 12;9:383. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-383.
2
Overcoming the barriers to chlamydia screening in general practice--a qualitative study.克服一般实践中衣原体筛查的障碍——一项定性研究。
Fam Pract. 2010 Jun;27(3):291-302. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmq004. Epub 2010 Mar 22.
3
Tools to overcome potential barriers to chlamydia screening in general practice: Qualitative evaluation of the implementation of a complex intervention.全科医疗中克服衣原体筛查潜在障碍的工具:一项复杂干预措施实施情况的定性评估
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Mar 22;17:33. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0430-2.
4
Exploring why a complex intervention piloted in general practices did not result in an increase in chlamydia screening and diagnosis: a qualitative evaluation using the fidelity of implementation model.探究在全科医疗中试行的一项复杂干预措施为何未导致衣原体筛查和诊断率上升:一项基于实施保真度模型的定性评估。
BMC Fam Pract. 2017 Mar 21;18(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0618-0.
5
Strategies used to increase chlamydia screening in general practice: a qualitative study.全科医疗中用于增加衣原体筛查的策略:一项定性研究。
Public Health. 2008 Sep;122(9):845-56. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2007.10.009. Epub 2008 Jul 14.
6
Exploring attitudes and practices of General Practice staff towards offers of opportunistic screening for chlamydia: a UK survey.探索全科医疗工作人员对衣原体机会性筛查提议的态度和做法:一项英国调查。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2012 Jul;13(3):255-68. doi: 10.1017/S1463423611000612.
7
"...they should be offering it": a qualitative study to investigate young peoples' attitudes towards chlamydia screening in GP surgeries.“他们应该提供这种服务”:一项定性研究调查年轻人对全科医生诊所进行衣原体筛查的态度。
BMC Public Health. 2010 Oct 18;10:616. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-616.
8
Chlamydia and HIV testing, contraception advice, and free condoms offered in general practice: a qualitative interview study of young adults' perceptions of this initiative.全科医疗中提供的衣原体和艾滋病毒检测、避孕建议及免费避孕套:一项关于年轻人对该举措看法的定性访谈研究
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Jul;67(660):e490-e500. doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X691325. Epub 2017 May 22.
9
Increasing chlamydia screening tests in general practice: a modified Zelen prospective Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial evaluating a complex intervention based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour.提高全科医学中的衣原体筛查测试:一项基于计划行为理论的复杂干预措施的改良 Zelen 前瞻性群组随机对照试验。
Sex Transm Infect. 2014 May;90(3):188-94. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2013-051029. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
10
Qualitative interviews with healthcare staff in four European countries to inform adaptation of an intervention to increase chlamydia testing.对四个欧洲国家的医护人员进行定性访谈,以指导一项旨在增加衣原体检测的干预措施的调整。
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 25;7(9):e017528. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017528.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding access to sexual and reproductive health in general practice using an adapted Candidacy Framework: a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis.使用适应性候选框架理解全科医疗中的性与生殖健康服务可及性:一项系统综述与定性证据综合分析
Br J Gen Pract. 2025 Jun 16. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2024.0522.
2
What is the effectiveness of community-based health promotion campaigns on chlamydia screening uptake in young people and what barriers and facilitators have been identified? A mixed-methods systematic review.基于社区的健康促进活动对年轻人进行衣原体筛查的效果如何,以及确定了哪些障碍和促进因素?一项混合方法系统评价。
Sex Transm Infect. 2022 Feb;98(1):62-69. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2021-055142. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
3
Application of the COM-B model to barriers and facilitators to chlamydia testing in general practice for young people and primary care practitioners: a systematic review.运用 COM-B 模型分析在年轻人和初级保健医生中进行衣原体检测的一般实践中的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2018 Oct 22;13(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0821-y.
4
Exploring why a complex intervention piloted in general practices did not result in an increase in chlamydia screening and diagnosis: a qualitative evaluation using the fidelity of implementation model.探究在全科医疗中试行的一项复杂干预措施为何未导致衣原体筛查和诊断率上升:一项基于实施保真度模型的定性评估。
BMC Fam Pract. 2017 Mar 21;18(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0618-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Strategies used to increase chlamydia screening in general practice: a qualitative study.全科医疗中用于增加衣原体筛查的策略:一项定性研究。
Public Health. 2008 Sep;122(9):845-56. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2007.10.009. Epub 2008 Jul 14.
2
Preventing sexually transmissible infections in Australian general practice.在澳大利亚全科医疗中预防性传播感染
Int J STD AIDS. 2008 Jul;19(7):459-63. doi: 10.1258/ijsa.2008.007297.
3
Visual prompt poster for promoting patient-physician conversations on weight loss.用于促进医患关于减肥话题交流的视觉提示海报。
Ann Fam Med. 2008 Jan-Feb;6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S33-6. doi: 10.1370/afm.780.
4
Chlamydia screening in at-risk adolescent females: an evaluation of screening practices and modifiable screening correlates.对高危青春期女性进行衣原体筛查:筛查实践及可改变的筛查相关因素评估
J Adolesc Health. 2006 Jun;38(6):726-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2005.07.004.
5
Simplifying chlamydia testing: an innovative Chlamydia trachomatis testing approach using the internet and a home sampling strategy: population based study.简化衣原体检测:一种利用互联网和家庭采样策略的创新型沙眼衣原体检测方法:基于人群的研究
Sex Transm Infect. 2006 Apr;82(2):142-7; discussion 152-3. doi: 10.1136/sti.2005.016832.
6
Providing written information on HIV testing improves patient knowledge but does not affect test uptake.提供有关艾滋病毒检测的书面信息可提高患者的认知,但不会影响检测接受率。
Int J STD AIDS. 2006 Mar;17(3):185-8. doi: 10.1258/095646206775809303.
7
Opportunistic and systematic screening for chlamydia: a study of consultations by young adults in general practice.衣原体的机会性和系统性筛查:一项关于年轻人在全科医疗中就诊情况的研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2006 Feb;56(523):99-103.
8
Prevalence of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis increases significantly with level of urbanisation and suggests targeted screening approaches: results from the first national population based study in the Netherlands.泌尿生殖系统沙眼衣原体的患病率随城市化水平显著增加,并提示了针对性的筛查方法:荷兰第一项基于全国人口研究的结果
Sex Transm Infect. 2005 Feb;81(1):17-23. doi: 10.1136/sti.2004.010173.
9
Impact of information leaflets on HIV test uptake amongst GUM clinic attendees: an update.信息传单对性传播感染诊所就诊者接受HIV检测的影响:最新情况
Int J STD AIDS. 2004 Jun;15(6):422-3. doi: 10.1258/095646204774195308.
10
Effects of communicating individual risks in screening programmes: Cochrane systematic review.筛查项目中个体风险沟通的效果:Cochrane系统评价
BMJ. 2003 Sep 27;327(7417):703-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7417.703.

在全科医疗中使用海报和传单推广衣原体筛查——一项定性研究。

Promoting chlamydia screening with posters and leaflets in general practice--a qualitative study.

机构信息

Gloucestershire Research & Development Support Unit, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Great Western Road,Gloucester, UK.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2009 Oct 12;9:383. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-383.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-9-383
PMID:19821964
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2766388/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

General practice staff are reluctant to discuss sexual health opportunistically in all consultations. Health promotion materials may help alleviate this barrier. Chlamydia screening promotion posters and leaflets, produced by the English National Chlamydia Screening Programme (NCSP), have been available to general practices, through local chlamydia screening offices, since its launch. In this study we explored the attitudes of general practice staff to these screening promotional materials, how they used them, and explored other promotional strategies to encourage chlamydia screening.

METHODS

Twenty-five general practices with a range of screening rates, were purposively selected from six NCSP areas in England. In focus groups doctors, nurses, administrative staff and receptionists were encouraged to discuss candidly their experiences about their use and opinions of posters, leaflets and advertising to promote chlamydia screening. Researchers observed whether posters and leaflets were on display in reception and/or waiting areas. Data were collected and analysed concurrently using a stepwise framework analytical approach.

RESULTS

Although two-thirds of screening practices reported that they displayed posters and leaflets, they were not prominently displayed in most practices. Only a minority of practices reported actively using screening promotional materials on an ongoing basis. Most staff in all practices were not following up the advertising in posters and leaflets by routinely offering opportunistic screening to their target population. Some staff in many practices thought posters and leaflets would cause offence or embarrassment to their patients. Distribution of chlamydia leaflets by receptionists was thought to be inappropriate by some practices, as they thought patients would be offended when being offered a leaflet in a public area. Practice staff suggested the development of pocket-sized leaflets.

CONCLUSION

The NCSP should consider developing a range of more discrete but eye catching posters and small leaflets specifically to promote chlamydia screening in different scenarios within general practice; coordinators should audit their use. Practice staff need to discuss, with their screening co-ordinator, how different practice staff can promote chlamydia screening most effectively using the NCSP promotional materials, and change them regularly so that they do not loose their impact. Education to change all practice staff's attitudes towards sexual health is needed to reduce their worries about displaying the chlamydia materials, and how they may follow up the advertising up with a verbal offer of screening opportunistically to 15-24 year olds whenever they visit the practice.

摘要

背景

全科医生不愿意在所有咨询中都偶然讨论性健康问题。健康促进材料可能有助于缓解这一障碍。自英国国家衣原体筛查计划(NCSP)启动以来,通过当地衣原体筛查办公室,已向全科医生提供衣原体筛查推广海报和传单。在这项研究中,我们探讨了全科医生对这些筛查推广材料的态度,他们如何使用这些材料,并探讨了其他推广策略以鼓励衣原体筛查。

方法

从英格兰六个 NCSP 地区有不同筛查率的 25 家全科医生诊所中进行了有针对性的选择。在焦点小组中,鼓励医生、护士、行政人员和接待员坦诚地讨论他们在使用海报、传单和广告来推广衣原体筛查方面的经验和意见。研究人员观察了海报和传单是否在接待处和/或等候区展示。使用逐步框架分析方法同时收集和分析数据。

结果

尽管三分之二的筛查诊所报告说他们展示了海报和传单,但在大多数诊所中,这些海报和传单并没有被突出展示。只有少数诊所报告说他们在持续主动地使用筛查推广材料。所有诊所的大多数工作人员都没有通过常规向目标人群提供偶然筛查来跟进海报和传单上的广告。许多诊所的一些工作人员认为海报和传单会让他们的病人感到冒犯或尴尬。一些诊所认为,由接待员分发衣原体传单是不合适的,因为他们认为当病人在公共区域收到传单时,他们会感到冒犯。诊所工作人员建议开发袖珍传单。

结论

NCSP 应考虑开发一系列更具隐蔽性但引人注目的海报和小传单,专门在全科医生中推广不同场景下的衣原体筛查;协调员应审核其使用情况。诊所工作人员需要与他们的筛查协调员讨论,不同的诊所工作人员如何最有效地使用 NCSP 推广材料来推广衣原体筛查,以及定期更换这些材料,以保持其影响力。需要对所有诊所工作人员进行教育,以改变他们对性健康的态度,减少他们对展示衣原体材料的担忧,以及如何在病人每次访问诊所时,通过偶然提供性健康检查的口头建议来跟进广告。