Suppr超能文献

筛查项目中个体风险沟通的效果:Cochrane系统评价

Effects of communicating individual risks in screening programmes: Cochrane systematic review.

作者信息

Edwards Adrian, Unigwe Silvana, Elwyn Glyn, Hood Kerenza

机构信息

Department of Primary Care, University of Wales Swansea Clinical School, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP.

出版信息

BMJ. 2003 Sep 27;327(7417):703-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7417.703.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effects of different types of individualised risk communication for patients who are deciding whether to participate in screening.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

DATA SOURCES

Specialist register of the Cochrane consumers and communication review group, scientific databases, and a manual follow up of references.

SELECTION OF STUDIES

Studies were randomised controlled trials addressing decisions by patients whether or not to undergo screening and incorporating an intervention with an element of "individualised" risk communication-based on the individual's own risk factors for a condition (such as age or family history).

OUTCOME MEASURES

The principal outcome was uptake of screening tests; further cognitive and affective measures were also assessed to gauge informed decision making.

RESULTS

13 studies were included, 10 of which addressed mammography programmes. Individualised risk communication was associated with an increased uptake of screening tests (odds ratio 1.5, 95% confidence interval 1.11 to 2.03). Few cognitive or affective outcomes were reported consistently, so it was not possible to conclude whether this increase in the uptake of tests was related to informed decision making by patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Individualised risk estimates may be effective for purposes of population health, but their effects on increasing uptake of screening programmes may not be interpretable as evidence of informed decision making by patients. Greater attention is required to ways of developing interventions for screening programmes that can achieve this.

摘要

目的

评估不同类型的个体化风险沟通对正在决定是否参加筛查的患者的影响。

设计

系统评价。

数据来源

Cochrane消费者与沟通评价小组的专业注册库、科学数据库以及参考文献的手工追踪。

研究选择

研究为随机对照试验,涉及患者是否接受筛查的决策,并纳入基于个体自身疾病风险因素(如年龄或家族史)的具有“个体化”风险沟通元素的干预措施。

结局指标

主要结局是筛查检查的接受情况;还评估了进一步的认知和情感指标以衡量知情决策。

结果

纳入13项研究,其中10项涉及乳腺X线摄影项目。个体化风险沟通与筛查检查接受率的增加相关(比值比1.5,95%置信区间1.11至2.03)。很少有认知或情感结局被一致报道,因此无法得出检查接受率的增加是否与患者的知情决策有关。

结论

个体化风险评估对于人群健康目的可能是有效的,但其对增加筛查项目接受率的影响可能不能被解释为患者知情决策的证据。需要更加关注为筛查项目制定能够实现这一目标的干预措施的方法。

相似文献

6
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
9
Community screening for visual impairment in older people.老年人视力障碍的社区筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 20;2(2):CD001054. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001054.pub3.
10
Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions.心理健康问题患者的共同决策干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 11;11(11):CD007297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007297.pub3.

引用本文的文献

4
A Validated Risk Prediction Model for Breast Cancer in US Black Women.美国黑人女性乳腺癌风险预测模型的验证。
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Dec 1;39(34):3866-3877. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01236. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
9
The WISDOM Study: breaking the deadlock in the breast cancer screening debate.智慧研究:打破乳腺癌筛查辩论的僵局
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2017 Sep 13;3:34. doi: 10.1038/s41523-017-0035-5. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

6
A measure of informed choice.知情选择的一种衡量方式。
Health Expect. 2001 Jun;4(2):99-108. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00140.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验