• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护理教育中的技术支持:课堂上的点击器

Technology support in nursing education: clickers in the classroom.

作者信息

Berry Janice

机构信息

University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Marshfield, USA.

出版信息

Nurs Educ Perspect. 2009 Sep-Oct;30(5):295-8.

PMID:19824239
Abstract

Research has shown that the present generation of students has a preference for digital literacy, experiential learning, interactivity, and immediacy; therefore, greater use of technology is being brought into university courses to aid in student involvement. Student Response Systems, called clickers, were incorporated as a teaching methodology to enhance student interaction and learning in a didactic pediatric nursing course. This course was taught over Interactive Television (ITV) with students at a distant site as well as face to face, creating the challenge of whole-class engagement. Clickers were used to actively engage students at both sites simultaneously and give immediate feedback to students regarding understanding of lecture material. Clickers also allowed small-group problem solving of questions. Exam grades and level of participation in case studies were monitored and exam scores and final scores were compared to those of a previous class. Student t-tests demonstrated that one of three course exams and final course grades were significantly higher for the students who used clickers in the classroom. Satisfaction feedback also supported the use of clickers as a tool to engage students and enhance learning outcomes.

摘要

研究表明,当代学生偏爱数字素养、体验式学习、互动性和即时性;因此,大学课程中更多地引入了技术手段来促进学生参与。学生应答系统,即课堂反馈器,被作为一种教学方法纳入到小儿护理理论课程中,以增强学生互动和学习效果。该课程通过交互式电视(ITV)进行授课,学生在远程站点以及面对面参与课程,这带来了全班学生参与度的挑战。课堂反馈器被用于同时积极吸引两个站点的学生,并就学生对讲座材料的理解给予即时反馈。课堂反馈器还允许对问题进行小组讨论解决。监测了考试成绩和案例研究中的参与水平,并将考试分数和最终成绩与上一届班级进行了比较。学生t检验表明,在课堂上使用课堂反馈器的学生,三门课程考试中的一门以及课程最终成绩显著更高。满意度反馈也支持将课堂反馈器作为一种吸引学生并提高学习成果的工具。

相似文献

1
Technology support in nursing education: clickers in the classroom.护理教育中的技术支持:课堂上的点击器
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2009 Sep-Oct;30(5):295-8.
2
Evidence for teaching practice: the impact of clickers in a large classroom environment.教学实践的证据:课堂环境下使用点击器的影响。
Nurse Educ Today. 2010 Oct;30(7):603-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2009.12.008. Epub 2009 Dec 30.
3
Click it: assessment of classroom response systems in physician assistant education.点击它:医师助理教育中课堂反馈系统的评估
J Allied Health. 2011 Spring;40(1):e1-5.
4
"The Child's World": a creative and visual trigger to stimulate student enquiry in a problem based learning module.《儿童世界》:一种创造性的视觉触发因素,用于在基于问题的学习模块中激发学生的探究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2008 Nov;28(8):962-9. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2008.05.017. Epub 2008 Jul 24.
5
A study of the effectiveness of an interactive computer classroom.
Comput Nurs. 1998 Nov-Dec;16(6):333-8.
6
A comparison of two methods of teaching. Computer managed instruction and keypad questions versus traditional classroom lecture.两种教学方法的比较。计算机管理教学与按键式问题教学法对比传统课堂讲授法。
Comput Nurs. 1995 Nov-Dec;13(6):285-8.
7
Online vs classroom instruction: student satisfaction and learning outcomes in an undergraduate Allied Health pharmacology course.线上教学与课堂教学:本科联合健康药理学课程中的学生满意度与学习成果
J Allied Health. 2009 Summer;38(2):e36-42.
8
Rules of engagement-12 tips for successful use of "clickers" in the classroom.参与规则——在课堂上成功使用“课堂应答器”的12个小贴士。
Med Teach. 2008;30(2):146-9. doi: 10.1080/01421590801965111.
9
Effectiveness, challenges, and perceptions of classroom participation systems.课堂参与系统的有效性、挑战及认知
Nurse Educ. 2009 Jul-Aug;34(4):156-61. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0b013e3181aab7e3.
10
Promoting student-centered active learning in lectures with a personal response system.利用个人响应系统在讲座中促进以学生为中心的主动学习。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2009 Mar;33(1):60-71. doi: 10.1152/advan.00109.2007.

引用本文的文献

1
Pros and Cons of Audience Response Systems in the Education of Health Professionals.受众反应系统在卫生专业人员教育中的利弊
MedEdPublish (2016). 2019 Sep 24;8:182. doi: 10.15694/mep.2019.000182.1. eCollection 2019.
2
COVID-19 Pandemic and E-Learning Satisfaction in Medical and Non-Medical Student: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.新冠疫情与医学和非医学专业学生的电子学习满意度:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Iran J Public Health. 2021 Dec;50(12):2509-2516. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v50i12.7933.
3
Effects of Gamification on the Benefits of Student Response Systems in Learning of Human Anatomy: Three Experimental Studies.
游戏化对学生反应系统在人体解剖学学习中的益处的影响:三项实验研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 15;18(24):13210. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413210.
4
Strategies for sustaining and enhancing nursing students' engagement in academic and clinical settings: a narrative review.维持和增强护生在学术和临床环境中参与度的策略:叙事性综述。
Korean J Med Educ. 2020 Jun;32(2):103-117. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2020.159. Epub 2020 May 28.
5
A Faculty Toolkit for Formative Assessment in Pharmacy Education.药学教育中形成性评估的教师工具包。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2014 Nov 15;78(9):160. doi: 10.5688/ajpe789160.
6
Perceptions of pharmacy students, faculty members, and administrators on the use of technology in the classroom.学生、教师和管理人员对课堂技术使用的看法。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 May 13;77(4):75. doi: 10.5688/ajpe77475.