• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种教学方法的比较。计算机管理教学与按键式问题教学法对比传统课堂讲授法。

A comparison of two methods of teaching. Computer managed instruction and keypad questions versus traditional classroom lecture.

作者信息

Halloran L

机构信息

Western Connecticut State University, USA.

出版信息

Comput Nurs. 1995 Nov-Dec;13(6):285-8.

PMID:8529142
Abstract

Computers increasingly are being integrated into nursing education. One method of integration is through computer managed instruction (CMI). Recently, technology has become available that allows the integration of keypad questions into CMI. This brings a new type of interactivity between students and teachers into the classroom. The purpose of this study was to evaluate differences in achievement between a control group taught by traditional classroom lecture (TCL) and an experimental group taught using CMI and keypad questions. Both control and experimental groups consisted of convenience samples of junior nursing students in a baccalaureate program taking a medical/surgical nursing course. Achievement was measured by three instructor-developed multiple choice examinations. Findings demonstrated that although the experimental group demonstrated increasingly higher test scores as the semester progressed, no statistical difference was found in achievement between the two groups. One reason for this may be phenomenon of vampire video. Initially, the method of presentation overshadowed the content. As students became desensitized to the method, they were able to focus and absorb more content. This study suggests that CMI and keypads are a viable teaching option for nursing education. It is equal to TCL in student achievement and provides a new level of interaction in the classroom setting.

摘要

计算机越来越多地被整合到护理教育中。一种整合方法是通过计算机管理教学(CMI)。最近,出现了一种技术,可将键盘问题整合到CMI中。这为课堂带来了一种新型的师生互动。本研究的目的是评估传统课堂讲授(TCL)授课的对照组与使用CMI和键盘问题授课的实验组在成绩上的差异。对照组和实验组均由参加医学/外科护理课程的护理学本科项目低年级学生的便利样本组成。成绩通过教师编制的三份多项选择题考试来衡量。研究结果表明,尽管实验组的考试成绩随着学期的推进越来越高,但两组在成绩上没有发现统计学差异。造成这种情况的一个原因可能是“吸血鬼视频”现象。最初,呈现方式掩盖了内容。随着学生对这种方式变得不那么敏感,他们能够集中精力并吸收更多内容。本研究表明,CMI和键盘是护理教育中一种可行的教学选择。在学生成绩方面它与TCL相当,并在课堂环境中提供了一个新的互动层面。

相似文献

1
A comparison of two methods of teaching. Computer managed instruction and keypad questions versus traditional classroom lecture.两种教学方法的比较。计算机管理教学与按键式问题教学法对比传统课堂讲授法。
Comput Nurs. 1995 Nov-Dec;13(6):285-8.
2
The effectiveness of computer-managed instruction versus traditional classroom lecture on achievement outcomes.计算机管理教学与传统课堂讲授在学习成果方面的有效性。
Comput Nurs. 1991 Jul-Aug;9(4):159-63.
3
A study of the effectiveness of an interactive computer classroom.
Comput Nurs. 1998 Nov-Dec;16(6):333-8.
4
Computer-aided vs. tutor-delivered teaching of exposure therapy for phobia/panic: randomized controlled trial with pre-registration nursing students.计算机辅助与教师指导的针对恐惧症/恐慌症的暴露疗法教学:对预注册护理专业学生的随机对照试验
Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 Mar;44(3):397-405. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.02.009. Epub 2006 Apr 24.
5
The most successful method in teaching nursing students infection control - E-learning or lecture?在护理专业学生感染控制教学中最成功的方法——电子学习还是讲座?
Nurse Educ Today. 2008 Oct;28(7):798-806. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2008.03.005. Epub 2008 Apr 28.
6
The effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction in teaching nursing students about congenital heart disease.计算机辅助教学在向护理专业学生传授先天性心脏病知识方面的有效性。
Comput Nurs. 2000 Nov-Dec;18(6):282-7.
7
Technology support in nursing education: clickers in the classroom.护理教育中的技术支持:课堂上的点击器
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2009 Sep-Oct;30(5):295-8.
8
Exploring student response systems in nursing education.探索护理教育中的学生应答系统。
Comput Inform Nurs. 2008 Sep-Oct;26(5):265-70; quiz 271-2. doi: 10.1097/01.NCN.0000304840.36960.b5.
9
Effectiveness, challenges, and perceptions of classroom participation systems.课堂参与系统的有效性、挑战及认知
Nurse Educ. 2009 Jul-Aug;34(4):156-61. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0b013e3181aab7e3.
10
Evidence for teaching practice: the impact of clickers in a large classroom environment.教学实践的证据:课堂环境下使用点击器的影响。
Nurse Educ Today. 2010 Oct;30(7):603-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2009.12.008. Epub 2009 Dec 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Pros and Cons of Audience Response Systems in the Education of Health Professionals.受众反应系统在卫生专业人员教育中的利弊
MedEdPublish (2016). 2019 Sep 24;8:182. doi: 10.15694/mep.2019.000182.1. eCollection 2019.
2
Assessment Competency of Nurses in Biological Incidents.护士在生物事件中的评估能力
Trauma Mon. 2015 Nov;20(4):e25607. doi: 10.5812/traumamon.25607. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
3
Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips.大教室里的课堂应答系统:当前研究与最佳实践技巧
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2007 Spring;6(1):9-20. doi: 10.1187/cbe.06-12-0205.
4
Assessment of an electronic voting system within the tutorial setting: a randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN54535861].在教程环境中对电子投票系统的评估:一项随机对照试验[ISRCTN54535861]
BMC Med Educ. 2005 Jul 7;5(1):24. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-5-24.
5
The evaluation of computer-aided learning in medicine.医学中计算机辅助学习的评估。
Postgrad Med J. 1998 Dec;74(878):706-8. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.74.878.706.