Ramappa Manjunath, Port Andrew
Department Of Orthopaedics, James Cook University Hospital Middlesbrough, TS4 3BW UK.
Cases J. 2009 Jul 30;2:8716. doi: 10.4076/1757-1626-2-8716.
Revision acetabulum arthroplasty is one of the common procedures, which has been on the rise recently. Many implants are available in the market with variable results. Aseptic loosening is the most common indication for revision acetabulum arthroplasty. Birmingham dysplasia cup has been used occasionally in these complex procedures. We know that these implants have provided good results in resurfacing dysplastic hips with bone loss. Literature review failed to answer whether these implants were as effective in revision acetabulum arthroplasty.
We herby, present a case of revision acetabulum arthroplasty performed with Birmingham dysplasia acetabular cup, which unfortunately failed within a period of eight months. Surgical technique appeared to be adequate. On further analysis, significant differences were identified between dysplastic hips with bone loss and revision hips with bone loss.
Therefore results obtained with dysplasia cups in resurfacing dysplastic hips does not seem to be applicable to revision hip arthroplasty. Hence these cups should be restricted to primary arthroplasty.
髋臼翻修术是常见手术之一,近年来呈上升趋势。市场上有多种植入物,效果各异。无菌性松动是髋臼翻修术最常见的指征。伯明翰发育不良髋臼杯偶尔用于这些复杂手术。我们知道这些植入物在修复伴有骨质流失的发育不良髋关节方面取得了良好效果。文献综述未能回答这些植入物在髋臼翻修术中是否同样有效。
在此,我们呈现一例使用伯明翰发育不良髋臼杯进行的髋臼翻修术病例,不幸的是该病例在八个月内失败。手术技术看似充分。进一步分析发现,伴有骨质流失的发育不良髋关节与伴有骨质流失的翻修髋关节之间存在显著差异。
因此,发育不良髋臼杯在修复发育不良髋关节中取得的效果似乎不适用于髋关节翻修术。因此,这些髋臼杯应仅限于初次关节置换术。