Fangerau Heiner
Institute for the History, Philosophy and Ethics of Medicine, Ulm University, Ulm.
Soc Stud Sci. 2009 Apr;39(2):229-56. doi: 10.1177/0306312708101045.
In 1917, the German-American scientist Jacques Loeb (1859-1924) published a short essay, entitled 'Biology and War', that summarized his disagreement with World War I. He was deeply saddened by the break-up of the international scientific community as a consequence of the actions of bellicose politicians. These actions were in direct opposition to his efforts to promote social reform, mechanistic biology and scientific internationalism. The aim of this paper is to examine Loeb's activities aimed at these efforts before, during and after the war. It attempts to explain how Loeb's scientific work was formed, what was special about it and why it was both successful and attacked. Particular emphasis is placed on how Loeb reacted to the War and the subsequent forced disintegration of his international scientific network. Loeb's attempts to integrate his interpretation of biology into post-war Europe's approach to the life sciences is analysed in connection with his social commitment. It is argued that his emigration to the USA, the circumstances of World War I, the reaction of his German colleagues to it and the demolition of the international scientific community changed: (1) Loeb's feelings towards his old home; (2) the direction of his scientific endeavours; and (3) his engagement in science politics. His correspondence with eminent scientists from all over the world serves as a key to Loeb's efforts in the context of the social elements of scientific networks and perceptions.
1917年,德裔美国科学家雅克·洛布(1859 - 1924)发表了一篇短文,题为《生物学与战争》,文中总结了他对第一次世界大战的反对态度。他对好战的政治家们的行为导致国际科学界的分裂深感痛心。这些行为与他推动社会改革、机械生物学和科学国际主义的努力背道而驰。本文旨在考察洛布在战前、战中和战后为这些努力所开展的活动。它试图解释洛布的科学工作是如何形成的,其独特之处何在,以及为何它既取得了成功又遭到了攻击。特别强调了洛布对战争以及随后其国际科学网络被迫瓦解的反应。结合洛布的社会承诺,分析了他将生物学解释融入战后欧洲生命科学研究方法的尝试。有人认为,他移民到美国、第一次世界大战的局势、他的德国同事对此的反应以及国际科学界的瓦解改变了:(1)洛布对他故国的感情;(2)他科学努力的方向;(3)他在科学政治方面的参与。他与世界各地杰出科学家的通信是了解洛布在科学网络和认知的社会因素背景下所做努力的关键。