Doel Ronald E, Hoffmann Dieter, Krementsov Nikolai
Department of History, Oregon State University, 306 Milam Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA.
Osiris. 2005;20:49-76. doi: 10.1086/649413.
Prior studies of modern scientific internationalism have been written primarily from the point of view of scientists, with little regard to the influence of the state. This study examines the state's role in international scientific relations. States sometimes encouraged scientific internationalism; in the mid-twentieth century, they often sought to restrict it. The present study examines state involvement in international scientific congresses, the primary intersection between the national and international dimensions of scientists' activities. Here we examine three comparative instances in which such restrictions affected scientific internationalism: an attempt to bring an international aerodynamics congress to Nazi Germany in the late 1930s, unsuccessful efforts by Soviet geneticists to host the Seventh International Genetics Congress in Moscow in 1937, and efforts by U.S. scientists to host international meetings in 1950s cold war America. These case studies challenge the classical ideology of scientific internationalism, wherein participation by a nation in a scientist's fame spares the scientist conflict between advancing his science and advancing the interests of his nation. In the cases we consider, scientists found it difficult to simultaneously support scientific universalism and elitist practices. Interest in these congresses reached the top levels of the state, and access to patronage beyond state control helped determine their outcomes.
先前关于现代科学国际主义的研究主要是从科学家的角度撰写的,很少考虑国家的影响。本研究考察了国家在国际科学关系中的作用。国家有时鼓励科学国际主义;在20世纪中叶,它们常常试图加以限制。本研究考察了国家对国际科学大会的参与情况,这是科学家活动的国家层面与国际层面的主要交汇点。在此,我们考察三个比较案例,在这些案例中,此类限制影响了科学国际主义:20世纪30年代后期试图将一次国际空气动力学大会带到纳粹德国、苏联遗传学家在1937年主办第七届国际遗传学大会于莫斯科的努力失败,以及美国科学家在20世纪50年代冷战时期的美国主办国际会议的努力。这些案例研究挑战了科学国际主义的经典观念,即在科学国际主义观念中,一个国家对某位科学家声誉的参与使该科学家免于在推进其科学事业与推进其国家利益之间产生冲突。在我们所考虑的案例中,科学家们发现很难同时支持科学普遍主义和精英主义做法。对这些大会的关注达到了国家最高层,而获得不受国家控制的赞助有助于决定其结果。