• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[从历史角度看布丰与物种的寿命]

[Buffon and the longevity of species in the light of history].

作者信息

Robine Jean-Marie, Petersen Hans Christian, Jeune Bernard

机构信息

INSERM, the French National Institute of Health and Medical Research, France.

出版信息

Dan Medicinhist Arbog. 2008;36:97-108.

PMID:19831293
Abstract

In 1749 Buffon proposed a general law for the longevity of species. In retrospect this law laid the foundation for modern studies of correlations between biological variables. Buffon refers to "la durée totale de la vie", the maximum lifespan, and claims that there is a systematic relationship between this variable and a measure of the growth period. It transpires that Buffon believed that by multiplying the age at the termination of the growth period by 7 one obtains the maximum lifespan. In vol III o the supplements to "Histoire Naturelle" he presents a table with, i.a., age at first reproduction and maximum lifespan for 31 Mammalian species, Furthermore, he claims that the growth period is equivalent to 2 times the age at first reproduction. From Buffon's data, one obtains a mean ratio of approximately 13 between maximum lifespan and age at first reproduction, where the expected ratio is 14 (2x7), i.e. very close to the observed ratio. Inspired by Buffon's proposition, we have investigated the same relationship in a modern dataset, comprising 564 Mammalian species. The best fitting statistical model for the relationship is not a simple multiplication, but an allometric equation: maximum lifespan = 11.47x(age at first reproduction)0.65. Taking into account the variation due to, i.a., phylogenetic constraints and adaptive divergence, Buffon's idea represents a basic biological relationship between life history characters.

摘要

1749年,布丰提出了一条关于物种寿命的普遍规律。回顾起来,这条规律为现代生物学变量之间相关性的研究奠定了基础。布丰提到的“生命的总时长”,即最大寿命,并声称这个变量与生长期的一个度量之间存在系统关系。原来布丰认为,将生长期结束时的年龄乘以7就能得到最大寿命。在《自然史》的第三卷补编中,他列出了一个表格,其中包括31种哺乳动物的首次繁殖年龄和最大寿命。此外,他声称生长期相当于首次繁殖年龄的2倍。根据布丰的数据,最大寿命与首次繁殖年龄之间的平均比率约为13,而预期比率是14(2×7),即与观察到的比率非常接近。受布丰这一观点的启发,我们在一个包含564种哺乳动物的现代数据集中研究了同样的关系。这种关系的最佳拟合统计模型不是简单的乘法,而是一个异速生长方程:最大寿命 = 11.47×(首次繁殖年龄)^0.65。考虑到诸如系统发育限制和适应性分化等因素导致的变异,布丰的观点代表了生命史特征之间的一种基本生物学关系。

相似文献

1
[Buffon and the longevity of species in the light of history].[从历史角度看布丰与物种的寿命]
Dan Medicinhist Arbog. 2008;36:97-108.
2
[Georges Louis Leclerc de Buffon (1701-1788). The main ideas of his science of life. On the tricentenary of the French naturalist's birthday].[乔治·路易·勒克莱尔·德·布丰(1701 - 1788)。他的生命科学主要思想。纪念这位法国博物学家诞辰三百周年]
Kwart Hist Nauki Tech. 2007;52(3-4):55-95.
3
[Buffon, the director of 'Jardin du Roi' in the 1700s].[布丰,18世纪“皇家植物园”的园长]
Dan Medicinhist Arbog. 2008;36:57-96.
4
History without time: Buffon's natural history as a nonmathematical physique.没有时间的历史:布丰的自然史作为一种非数学的自然哲学
Isis. 2010 Mar;101(1):30-61. doi: 10.1086/652688.
5
[Buffon (1707-1788)].[布丰(1707 - 1788)]
Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2008 Mar-Apr;136(3-4):196-9.
6
[Buffon: time, change and history].[布丰:时间、变化与历史]
Hist Philos Life Sci. 1990;12(2):203-23.
7
The organism as reality or as fiction: Buffon and beyond.作为现实或虚构的生物体:布丰及其之后
Hist Philos Life Sci. 2017 Mar;39(1):2. doi: 10.1007/s40656-016-0128-8. Epub 2016 Dec 30.
8
Reproduction versus metamorphosis: Hegel and the evolutionary thinking of his time.生殖与变态:黑格尔及其时代的进化思想。
Hist Philos Life Sci. 2020 Jul 16;42(3):31. doi: 10.1007/s40656-020-00326-x.
9
[Clandestinity, authority and experiments: styles and controversies on spontaneous generation from the Journal de Trévoux (1735) to Réaumur (1757)].
Med Secoli. 2003;15(2):319-50.
10
Natural history and temporalization: reflections on Buffon's Natural history.自然史与时间化:关于布丰《自然史》的思考
Hist Cienc Saude Manguinhos. 2013 Jul-Sep;20(3):813-29. doi: 10.1590/S0104-597020130003000005.