Suppr超能文献

一项关于阿昔洛韦和/或泼尼松龙早期治疗贝尔麻痹的随机对照试验:BELLS 研究。

A randomised controlled trial of the use of aciclovir and/or prednisolone for the early treatment of Bell's palsy: the BELLS study.

机构信息

Scottish School of Primary Care, University of Dundee, UK.

出版信息

Health Technol Assess. 2009 Oct;13(47):iii-iv, ix-xi 1-130. doi: 10.3310/hta13470.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether oral prednisolone or aciclovir, used separately or in combination, early in the course of Bell's palsy, improves the chances of recovery at 3 and 9 months.

DESIGN

A 2 x 2 factorial randomised double-blind trial. Patients were randomly assigned to treatment by an automated telephone service using a permuted block randomisation technique with block sizes of four or eight, and no stratification.

SETTING

Mainland Scotland, with referrals mainly from general practice to 17 hospital trial sites.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults (aged 16 years or older) with unilateral facial nerve weakness of no identifiable cause presenting to primary care, the emergency department or NHS24 within 72 hours of symptom onset.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomised to receive active preparations or placebo for 10 days: (1) prednisolone (50 mg per day, 2 x 25-mg capsules) and aciclovir (2000 mg per day, 5 x 400-mg capsules); (2) prednisolone and placebo (lactose, indistinguishable); (3) aciclovir and placebo; and (4) placebo and placebo.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was recovery of facial function assessed by the House-Brackmann scale. Secondary outcomes included health status, pain, self-perceived appearance and cost-effectiveness.

RESULTS

Final outcomes were available for 496 patients, balanced for gender; mean age 44 years; initial facial paralysis moderate to severe. One half of patients initiated treatment within 24 hours of onset of symptoms, one-third within 24-48 hours and the remainder within 48-72 hours. Of the completed patients, 357 had recovered by 3 months and 80 at 9 months, leaving 59 with a residual deficit. There were significant differences in complete recovery at 3 months between the prednisolone comparison groups (83.0% for prednisolone, 63.6% for no prednisolone, a difference of + 19.4%; 95% confidence interval (CI): + 11.7% to + 27.1%, p < 0.001). The number needed to treat (NNT) in order to achieve one additional complete recovery was 6 (95% CI: 4 to 9). There was no significant difference between the aciclovir comparison groups (71.2% for aciclovir and 75.7% for no aciclovir). Nine-month assessments of patients recovered were 94.4% for prednisolone compared with 81.6% for no prednisolone, a difference of + 12.8% (95% CI: + 7.2% to + 18.4%, p < 0.001); the NNT was 8 (95% CI: 6 to 14). Proportions recovered at 9 months were 85.4% for aciclovir and 90.8% for no aciclovir, a difference of -5.3%. There was no significant prednisolone-aciclovir interaction at 3 months or at 9 months. Outcome differences by individual treatment (the four-arm model) showed significant differences. At 3 months the recovery rate was 86.3% in the prednisolone treatment group, 79.7% in the aciclovir-prednisolone group, 64.7% in the placebo group and 62.5% in the aciclovir group. At 9 months the recovery rates were respectively 96.1%, 92.7%, 85.3% and 78.1%. The increase in recovery rate conferred by the addition of prednisolone (both for prednisolone over placebo and for aciclovir-prednisolone over aciclovir) is highly statistically significant (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in secondary measures apart from Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) at 9 months in those treated with prednisolone.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provided robust evidence to support the early use of oral prednisolone in Bell's palsy as an effective treatment which may be considered cost-effective. Treatment with aciclovir, either alone or with steroids, had no effect on outcome.

摘要

目的

确定在贝尔面瘫的早期,单独或联合使用口服泼尼松龙或阿昔洛韦是否能提高 3 个月和 9 个月时的恢复几率。

设计

2×2 析因随机双盲试验。患者通过自动电话服务随机分配治疗,使用区组随机化技术,区组大小为 4 或 8,无分层。

地点

苏格兰大陆,主要由全科医生向 17 家医院试验点转诊。

参与者

单侧面神经无力无明显原因的成年人,在发病后 72 小时内到初级保健、急诊或 NHS24 就诊。

干预措施

患者随机接受为期 10 天的活性制剂或安慰剂治疗:(1)泼尼松龙(每天 50mg,2×25mg 胶囊)和阿昔洛韦(每天 2000mg,5×400mg 胶囊);(2)泼尼松龙和安慰剂(乳糖,无法区分);(3)阿昔洛韦和安慰剂;和(4)安慰剂和安慰剂。

主要结局

主要结局是通过 House-Brackmann 量表评估的面部功能恢复情况。次要结局包括健康状况、疼痛、自我感知外观和成本效益。

结果

496 例患者完成了最终评估,性别均衡;平均年龄 44 岁;初始面神经瘫痪中度至重度。一半的患者在症状发作后 24 小时内开始治疗,三分之一在 24-48 小时内开始,其余在 48-72 小时内开始。在已完成的患者中,357 例在 3 个月时恢复,80 例在 9 个月时恢复,59 例留有残余缺陷。泼尼松龙组在 3 个月时完全恢复的差异有统计学意义(泼尼松龙组为 83.0%,无泼尼松龙组为 63.6%,差异为+19.4%;95%置信区间(CI):+11.7%至+27.1%,p<0.001)。为实现一个额外的完全恢复,需要治疗的人数(NNT)为 6(95%CI:4 至 9)。阿昔洛韦组之间没有显著差异(阿昔洛韦组为 71.2%,无阿昔洛韦组为 75.7%)。泼尼松龙组和无泼尼松龙组在 9 个月时的恢复评估分别为 94.4%和 81.6%,差异为+12.8%(95%CI:+7.2%至+18.4%,p<0.001);NNT 为 8(95%CI:6 至 14)。在 9 个月时,阿昔洛韦组和无阿昔洛韦组的恢复比例分别为 85.4%和 90.8%,差异为-5.3%。在 3 个月和 9 个月时,泼尼松龙和阿昔洛韦之间没有显著的相互作用。按个体治疗(四臂模型)进行的结果差异显示出显著差异。在 3 个月时,泼尼松龙治疗组的恢复率为 86.3%,阿昔洛韦-泼尼松龙组为 79.7%,安慰剂组为 64.7%,阿昔洛韦组为 62.5%。在 9 个月时,恢复率分别为 96.1%、92.7%、85.3%和 78.1%。泼尼松龙的添加(无论是泼尼松龙相对于安慰剂,还是阿昔洛韦-泼尼松龙相对于阿昔洛韦)增加了恢复率,这具有高度统计学意义(p<0.001)。除了 9 个月时的健康效用指数 3 分(HUI3)外,泼尼松龙治疗组的次要测量指标没有显著差异。

结论

本研究提供了有力的证据支持在贝尔面瘫的早期使用口服泼尼松龙作为一种有效的治疗方法,这可能被认为是具有成本效益的。单独使用阿昔洛韦或与类固醇联合使用对结局没有影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验