Service de médecine physique et de réadaptation, hôpital maritime de Berck, groupe hospitalier Raymond-Poincaré, 104, boulevard Raymond-Poincaré, 92380 Garches, France.
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2009 Dec;52(10):717-28. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2009.08.002. Epub 2009 Sep 5.
Sociocultural factors may influence the impact of chronic low back pain (cLBP) on patients. The goal of this study was to compare pain and disability levels, and psychobehavioural parameters in four French-speaking countries in patients with cLBP.
Two hundred and seventy-eight patients were included: 83 in France, 36 in Morocco, 75 in the Ivory Coast and 84 in Tunisia. Demographic data were collected; pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS), disability with the Quebec scale, psychobehavioural factors by the hospital anxiety depression scale (HAD), the fear and avoidance beliefs questionnaire (FABQ) and the coping strategy questionnaire (CSQ). A Student t-test was used to compare means. Anova (covariance) was used to test for a "Country Effect", i.e. the incidence of country on outcomes.
There was no difference in disability levels between countries. A "country effect" was found (p<0.001) for pain (F=2.707), anxiety (F=3.467), depression (F=5.137), fear and avoidance beliefs regarding professional activity (F=1.974) and physical activity (F=5.076), strategy of distraction, dramatization, efforts to ignore pain, prayer, seeking social support and reinterpretation (p<0.01). Pain level was higher in Morocco (p<0.05); anxiety, depression, fear and avoidance beliefs about physical activities were higher in Tunisia (p<0.05) and fear and avoidance beliefs about professional activities were higher in the Ivory Coast (p<0.01). Among the coping strategies used, distraction, dramatization, prayer and search for social support were used more in the Ivory Coast; reinterpretation in Tunisia; seeking social support was less common in France.
In this population of patients with cLBP, despite similar disability levels across the four French-speaking countries, there were considerable variations in pain level and psychobehavioural repercussions.
社会文化因素可能会影响慢性下背痛(cLBP)对患者的影响。本研究的目的是比较四个讲法语国家的 cLBP 患者的疼痛和残疾程度以及心理行为参数。
共纳入 278 例患者:法国 83 例,摩洛哥 36 例,科特迪瓦 75 例,突尼斯 84 例。收集人口统计学数据;使用视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估疼痛,使用魁北克评分评估残疾,使用医院焦虑抑郁量表(HAD)、恐惧和回避信念问卷(FABQ)和应对策略问卷(CSQ)评估心理行为因素。采用学生 t 检验比较均值。采用方差分析(协方差)检验“国家效应”,即国家对结果的影响。
各国间的残疾程度无差异。发现疼痛(F=2.707)、焦虑(F=3.467)、抑郁(F=5.137)、对专业活动(F=1.974)和体育活动(F=5.076)的恐惧和回避信念、分散注意力、戏剧化、努力忽略疼痛、祈祷、寻求社会支持和重新解释策略存在“国家效应”(p<0.01)。摩洛哥的疼痛水平较高(p<0.05);突尼斯的焦虑、抑郁、对身体活动的恐惧和回避信念较高(p<0.05),科特迪瓦的对专业活动的恐惧和回避信念较高(p<0.01)。使用的应对策略中,分散注意力、戏剧化、祈祷和寻求社会支持在科特迪瓦更为常见;突尼斯更常见重新解释;法国寻求社会支持较少。
在这组 cLBP 患者中,尽管四个讲法语国家的残疾程度相似,但疼痛程度和心理行为反应存在很大差异。