• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将强制性控制性别化。

Gendering Coercive Control.

机构信息

Department of Sociology, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA 98225, USA.

出版信息

Violence Against Women. 2009 Dec;15(12):1444-57. doi: 10.1177/1077801209346837. Epub 2009 Oct 15.

DOI:10.1177/1077801209346837
PMID:19834070
Abstract

This article examines the theory of gender presented in Stark's Coercive Control: How Men Entrap Women in Personal Life. Stark suggests that gender is a form of structural inequality that makes women more vulnerable than men to the strategies of coercive control. However, Stark assumes rather than demonstrates that gendered structural inequality increases women's vulnerability. In this article, the author applies the multilevel theory of gender as identity, interaction, and social structure to document the multiple ways coercive control is gendered. The author argues that, to understand the gender dynamics of coercive control, researchers must examine the interactions across levels of gender. The author concludes with an assessment of the prospects and pitfalls of applying the concept of coercive control to renew the feminist social movement to end domestic violence.

摘要

本文探讨了斯塔克在《强制性控制:男人如何在个人生活中困住女人》一书中提出的性别理论。斯塔克认为,性别是一种结构性不平等,使女性比男性更容易受到强制性控制策略的影响。然而,斯塔克假设而不是证明性别结构不平等会增加女性的脆弱性。在本文中,作者应用性别作为认同、互动和社会结构的多层次理论来记录强制性控制的多种性别化方式。作者认为,为了理解强制性控制的性别动态,研究人员必须研究性别层面之间的相互作用。作者最后评估了将强制性控制概念应用于更新结束家庭暴力的女权主义社会运动的前景和陷阱。

相似文献

1
Gendering Coercive Control.将强制性控制性别化。
Violence Against Women. 2009 Dec;15(12):1444-57. doi: 10.1177/1077801209346837. Epub 2009 Oct 15.
2
A battered women's movement perspective of Coercive Control.受虐妇女运动视角下的强制性控制。
Violence Against Women. 2009 Dec;15(12):1432-43. doi: 10.1177/1077801209346836. Epub 2009 Oct 9.
3
Rethinking Coercive Control.重新思考强制性控制。
Violence Against Women. 2009 Dec;15(12):1509-25. doi: 10.1177/1077801209347452. Epub 2009 Oct 22.
4
The paradox of progress: translating Evan Stark's Coercive Control into legal doctrine for abused women.进步的悖论:将埃文·斯塔克的《强制性控制》一文译为受虐妇女法律原则
Violence Against Women. 2009 Dec;15(12):1458-76. doi: 10.1177/1077801209347091. Epub 2009 Oct 9.
5
How to tell a new story about battering.如何讲述关于 battering 的新故事。
Violence Against Women. 2009 Dec;15(12):1490-508. doi: 10.1177/1077801209347093. Epub 2009 Oct 22.
6
Backlash or equality?: The influence of men's and women's rights discourses on domestic violence legislation in Ontario.抵制还是平等?:男性与女性权利话语对安大略省家庭暴力立法的影响
Violence Against Women. 2009 Jan;15(1):5-23. doi: 10.1177/1077801208328344. Epub 2008 Nov 17.
7
Living in the world of the domestic violence perpetrator: negotiating the unreality of coercive control.生活在家庭暴力施害者的世界中:协商强制性控制的不真实性。
Violence Against Women. 2010 Dec;16(12):1412-23. doi: 10.1177/1077801210389162.
8
Reframing violence against women as a human rights violation: Evan Stark's Coercive Control.将暴力侵害妇女行为重新定义为侵犯人权行为:埃文·斯塔尔的强制性控制。
Violence Against Women. 2009 Dec;15(12):1477-89. doi: 10.1177/1077801209346958. Epub 2009 Oct 15.
9
An integrative feminist model: the evolving feminist perspective on intimate partner violence.一种综合的女性主义模式:女性主义对亲密伴侣暴力的不断演变的观点。
Violence Against Women. 2007 Aug;13(8):817-41. doi: 10.1177/1077801207302039.
10
Domestic violence at the intersections of race, class, and gender: challenges and contributions to understanding violence against marginalized women in diverse communities.种族、阶级和性别的交叉点上的家庭暴力:理解不同社区中针对边缘化女性的暴力行为所面临的挑战与贡献。
Violence Against Women. 2005 Jan;11(1):38-64. doi: 10.1177/1077801204271476.

引用本文的文献

1
Association Between Family Support and Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy in a Cross-Sectional Study.一项横断面研究中家庭支持与母乳喂养自我效能之间的关联
Nurs Open. 2025 Apr;12(4):e70210. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70210.
2
Coercive Control in the Courtroom: the Legal Abuse Scale (LAS).法庭上的强制控制:法律虐待量表(LAS)。
J Fam Violence. 2023;38(3):527-542. doi: 10.1007/s10896-022-00408-3. Epub 2022 May 19.
3
Examining Adolescent Family Experiences as Risks for Young Adulthood Intimate Partner Violence in Two Longitudinal Samples.考察青少年家庭经历对两个纵向样本中成年早期亲密伴侣暴力的风险。
J Youth Adolesc. 2021 Sep;50(9):1797-1810. doi: 10.1007/s10964-021-01473-5. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
4
Change in prevalence of psychological and economic abuse, and controlling behaviours against women by an intimate partner in two cross-sectional studies in New Zealand, 2003 and 2019.2003 年和 2019 年在新西兰进行的两项横断面研究中,亲密伴侣对女性的心理和经济虐待以及控制行为的流行率变化。
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 23;11(3):e044910. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044910.
5
Patterns of violence and coercion with mental health among female and male trafficking survivors: a latent class analysis with mixture models.女性和男性人口贩运幸存者的心理健康与暴力和强制模式:混合模型的潜在类别分析。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2019 May 30;29:e38. doi: 10.1017/S2045796019000295.
6
Working with women who use force: a feasibility study protocol of the Positive (+)SHIFT group work programme in Australia.与使用暴力的妇女合作:澳大利亚 Positive (+)SHIFT 团体工作方案的可行性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 6;9(5):e027496. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027496.
7
Structural Violence on Women: An Impediment to Women Empowerment.针对妇女的结构性暴力:妇女赋权的障碍
Indian J Community Med. 2017 Jul-Sep;42(3):134-137. doi: 10.4103/ijcm.IJCM_276_15.