Lorenz W, Schult H D, Rothmund M
Institut für Theoretische Chirurgie, Philipps-Universität Marburg.
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl II Verh Dtsch Ges Chir. 1990:1283-90.
Although the final, individual decision making in patients always has to be in the hand of the doctor, it has hitherto been much less a matter of scientific analysis than formal decision making on the basis of clinical trials. To change this, several types of individual decision making were characterized, four in the field of intuition (very fast logical decisions, consciously and unconsciously heuristic decisions using special instruments, the deep remainder of intuition which can and should not be the subject of scientific analysis) and discursive (purely logical) decision making as a fifth type. The prospective think-aloud technique including an hierarchical heuristic decision tree was presented as a method for scientific analysis of individual decision making which is open to repetition and criticism. The place of various types of formal trials in this process was defined. Via a posit and the heuristic instrument of representativeness, the problem of the transfer of results from clinical trials to the individual patient was solved.
尽管最终患者的个体决策总是掌握在医生手中,但迄今为止,这在很大程度上并非科学分析的问题,而是基于临床试验的形式化决策。为改变这一状况,对几种个体决策类型进行了描述,在直觉领域有四种(非常快速的逻辑决策、使用特殊工具的有意识和无意识启发式决策、直觉的深层残余,这不能也不应成为科学分析的对象),还有一种是话语性(纯逻辑)决策作为第五种类型。提出了包括分层启发式决策树在内的前瞻性出声思维技术,作为一种对个体决策进行科学分析的方法,这种方法便于重复和接受批评。定义了各类形式化试验在这一过程中的地位。通过一个假设和代表性启发式工具,解决了从临床试验结果向个体患者转化的问题。