• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A structured implicit abstraction method to evaluate whether content of counseling before prostate cancer screening is consistent with recommendations by experts.一种结构化的隐式抽象方法,用于评估前列腺癌筛查前的咨询内容是否与专家建议一致。
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Dec;77(3):322-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.023. Epub 2009 Oct 17.
2
What should men know about prostate-specific antigen screening before giving informed consent?在给予知情同意之前,男性应该了解哪些关于前列腺特异性抗原筛查的信息?
Am J Med. 1998 Oct;105(4):266-74. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(98)00257-5.
3
Physician perspectives on the importance of facts men ought to know about prostate-specific antigen testing.医生对男性应该了解的前列腺特异性抗原检测相关事实重要性的看法。
J Gen Intern Med. 2003 May;18(5):350-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20626.x.
4
Informed consent for cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen: how well are men getting the message?关于前列腺特异性抗原癌症筛查的知情同意:男性对这一信息的了解程度如何?
Am J Public Health. 2003 May;93(5):779-85. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.5.779.
5
Informed consent for PSA screening: does it happen?前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)筛查的知情同意:它是否发生?
Eff Clin Pract. 1999 Jul-Aug;2(4):152-7.
6
Screening for prostate cancer with the prostate-specific antigen test: are patients making informed decisions?使用前列腺特异性抗原检测筛查前列腺癌:患者是否在做出明智的决策?
J Fam Pract. 1999 Sep;48(9):682-8.
7
A method to quantify and compare clinicians' assessments of patient understanding during counseling of standardized patients.一种量化和比较临床医生在标准化患者咨询期间评估患者理解能力的方法。
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Oct;77(1):128-35. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.03.013. Epub 2009 Apr 19.
8
Helping men make an informed decision about prostate cancer screening: a pilot study of telephone counseling.帮助男性做出关于前列腺癌筛查的知情决策:电话咨询的试点研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Feb;82(2):193-200. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.05.011. Epub 2010 Jun 15.
9
The influence of physician recommendation on prostate-specific antigen screening.医生建议对前列腺特异性抗原筛查的影响。
Urol Oncol. 2015 Oct;33(10):424.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.06.013. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
10
Deliberative democracy and cancer screening consent: a randomised control trial of the effect of a community jury on men's knowledge about and intentions to participate in PSA screening.协商民主与癌症筛查同意书:关于社区陪审团对男性前列腺特异性抗原筛查知识及参与意愿影响的随机对照试验
BMJ Open. 2014 Dec 24;4(12):e005691. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005691.

引用本文的文献

1
A method to assess the organizing behaviors used in physicians' counseling of standardized parents after newborn genetic screening.一种评估医生在新生儿基因筛查后对标准化父母进行咨询时所采用的组织行为的方法。
Commun Med. 2012;9(2):101-11. doi: 10.1558/cam.v9i2.101.
2
Frequency of high-quality communication behaviors used by primary care providers of heterozygous infants after newborn screening.先证者筛查后初级保健提供者用于杂合子婴儿的高质量沟通行为的频率。
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Feb;90(2):226-32. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.10.024. Epub 2012 Nov 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit.加权kappa系数:用于衡量名义尺度上的一致性,并考虑了尺度不一致或部分得分的情况。
Psychol Bull. 1968 Oct;70(4):213-20. doi: 10.1037/h0026256.
2
A method to quantify and compare clinicians' assessments of patient understanding during counseling of standardized patients.一种量化和比较临床医生在标准化患者咨询期间评估患者理解能力的方法。
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Oct;77(1):128-35. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.03.013. Epub 2009 Apr 19.
3
Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study.一项欧洲随机研究中的筛查与前列腺癌死亡率
N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 26;360(13):1320-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810084. Epub 2009 Mar 18.
4
Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial.一项前列腺癌随机筛查试验的死亡率结果。
N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 26;360(13):1310-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810696. Epub 2009 Mar 18.
5
Are cancer-related decision aids effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis.与癌症相关的决策辅助工具是否有效?一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Feb 20;27(6):974-85. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.16.0101. Epub 2009 Jan 5.
6
Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.前列腺癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组建议声明
Ann Intern Med. 2008 Aug 5;149(3):185-91. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-3-200808050-00008.
7
Pediatric residents' use of jargon during counseling about newborn genetic screening results.儿科住院医师在新生儿基因筛查结果咨询过程中使用行话的情况。
Pediatrics. 2008 Aug;122(2):243-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-2160.
8
A method to quantify residents' jargon use during counseling of standardized patients about cancer screening.一种在向标准化病人提供癌症筛查咨询时量化住院医师行话使用情况的方法。
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Dec;23(12):1947-52. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0729-3. Epub 2008 Aug 1.
9
Assessment of parental understanding by pediatric residents during counseling after newborn genetic screening.儿科住院医师在新生儿基因筛查后咨询过程中对家长理解情况的评估。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008 Mar;162(3):199-204. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2007.55.
10
Training faculty to facilitate communication skills training: development and evaluation of a workshop.培训教员以促进沟通技能培训:一个工作坊的开发与评估
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Mar;70(3):430-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.11.024. Epub 2008 Jan 16.

一种结构化的隐式抽象方法,用于评估前列腺癌筛查前的咨询内容是否与专家建议一致。

A structured implicit abstraction method to evaluate whether content of counseling before prostate cancer screening is consistent with recommendations by experts.

机构信息

Internal Medicine, Pediatrics, & Population Health-Bioethics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Center for Patient Care and Outcomes Research, 8701 Watertown Plank Road, Milwaukee, WI 53226-0509, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Dec;77(3):322-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.023. Epub 2009 Oct 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.023
PMID:19837527
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2787991/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the content of counseling about prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening. Guidelines recommend informed consent before screening because of concerns about benefits versus risks. As part of the professional practice standard for informed consent, clinicians should include content customarily provided by experts.

METHODS

40 transcripts of conversations between medicine residents and standardized patients were abstracted using an instrument derived from an expert Delphi panel that ranked 10 "facts that experts believe men ought to know."

RESULTS

Transcripts contained definite criteria for an average of 1.7 facts, and either definite or partial criteria for 5.1 facts. Second- and third-year residents presented more facts than interns (p=0.01). The most common facts were "false positive PSA tests can occur" and "use of the PSA test as a screening test is controversial." There was an r=0.88 correlation between inclusion by residents and the experts' ranking.

CONCLUSION

Counseling varied but most transcripts included some expert-recommended facts. The absence of other facts could be a quality deficit or an effort to prioritize messages and lessen cognitive demands on the patient.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Clinicians should adapt counseling for each patient, but our abstraction approach may help to assess the quality of informed consent over larger populations.

摘要

目的

评估前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)筛查咨询的内容。指南建议在筛查前进行知情同意,因为需要权衡其获益和风险。作为知情同意专业实践标准的一部分,临床医生应该包括专家通常提供的内容。

方法

从专家德尔菲小组排名的 10 个“专家认为男性应该知道的事实”中得出的工具,对 40 名医学住院医师与标准化患者之间对话的记录进行了摘要。

结果

记录中包含了平均 1.7 个事实的明确标准,以及 5.1 个事实的明确或部分标准。第二年和第三年住院医师比实习医生提供的事实更多(p=0.01)。最常见的事实是“PSA 检测可能出现假阳性”和“使用 PSA 检测作为筛查试验存在争议”。住院医师纳入的事实与专家排名之间存在 r=0.88 的相关性。

结论

咨询内容各不相同,但大多数记录都包含了一些专家推荐的事实。缺乏其他事实可能是质量缺陷,也可能是为了优先考虑信息,并减轻患者的认知负担。

实践意义

临床医生应该为每位患者调整咨询内容,但我们的抽象方法可能有助于评估更大人群知情同意的质量。