• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

是什么让社区对老年人友好:国际文献综述。

What makes a community age-friendly: A review of international literature.

作者信息

Lui Chi-Wai, Everingham Jo-Anne, Warburton Jeni, Cuthill Michael, Bartlett Helen

机构信息

University of Queensland, Herston, Australia.

出版信息

Australas J Ageing. 2009 Sep;28(3):116-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6612.2009.00355.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1741-6612.2009.00355.x
PMID:19845650
Abstract

This paper undertakes a comprehensive review of the growing international literature on age-friendly communities. It examines a range of approaches and identifies the key attributes associated with creating a sustainable environment for seniors. The authors critically evaluate emerging policy trends and models and suggest directions for future research attention. The discussion provides important information and insights for the development of ageing policy and planning in Australia.

摘要

本文对日益增多的关于老年友好型社区的国际文献进行了全面综述。它审视了一系列方法,并确定了与为老年人创造可持续环境相关的关键属性。作者对新兴的政策趋势和模式进行了批判性评估,并提出了未来研究关注的方向。该讨论为澳大利亚老龄政策和规划的发展提供了重要信息和见解。

相似文献

1
What makes a community age-friendly: A review of international literature.是什么让社区对老年人友好:国际文献综述。
Australas J Ageing. 2009 Sep;28(3):116-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6612.2009.00355.x.
2
Examining the relationship between communities' 'age-friendliness' and life satisfaction and self-perceived health in rural Manitoba, Canada.研究加拿大曼尼托巴省农村地区社区的“对老年人友好程度”与生活满意度及自我认知健康之间的关系。
Rural Remote Health. 2014;14:2594. Epub 2014 Jan 18.
3
Older people's decisions regarding 'ageing in place': a Western Australian case study.老年人关于“就地养老”的决策:西澳大利亚州的一个案例研究。
Australas J Ageing. 2011 Sep;30(3):136-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6612.2010.00469.x. Epub 2010 Oct 1.
4
Indicators of activity-friendly communities: an evidence-based consensus process.适宜活动社区的指标:基于证据的共识达成过程。
Am J Prev Med. 2006 Dec;31(6):515-24. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.07.026.
5
Conceptualizing age-friendly communities.概念化老年友好型社区。
Can J Aging. 2011 Sep;30(3):479-93. doi: 10.1017/S0714980811000237. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
6
Environments for healthy ageing: a critical review.健康老龄化的环境:批判性综述
Maturitas. 2009 Sep 20;64(1):14-9. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2009.07.011. Epub 2009 Aug 19.
7
Developing age-friendly cities: case studies from Brussels and Manchester and implications for policy and practice.发展适合老年人的城市:来自布鲁塞尔和曼彻斯特的案例研究及其对政策与实践的启示
J Aging Soc Policy. 2014;26(1-2):52-72. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2014.855043.
8
Synthesis of the expert group meetings convened as part of the substantive preparations for the International Conference on Population and Development.作为国际人口与发展会议实质性筹备工作一部分而召开的专家组会议纪要。 (注:原英文文本表述不太完整准确,推测这里是想表达会议纪要之类的意思,以上翻译是基于合理推测给出的较符合语境的译文 )
Popul Bull UN. 1993(34-35):3-18.
9
Age-Friendly Communities and Life Satisfaction Among the Elderly in Urban China.中国城市老年人中的友好型社区与生活满意度
Res Aging. 2018 Oct;40(9):883-905. doi: 10.1177/0164027518757760. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
10
Chinese villages and their sustainable future: the European Union-China-Research Project "SUCCESS".中国乡村及其可持续未来:欧盟-中国研究项目“SUCCESS”
J Environ Manage. 2008 Apr;87(2):204-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.06.012. Epub 2007 Sep 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Influencing Older Adults' Perception of the Age-Friendliness of Their Environment and the Impact of Loneliness, Technology Use, and Mobility: Quantitative Analysis.影响老年人对其环境年龄友好度认知的因素以及孤独感、技术使用和行动能力的影响:定量分析
JMIR Aging. 2025 May 6;8:e67242. doi: 10.2196/67242.
2
Multidimensional Evaluation of the Process of Constructing Age-Friendly Communities Among Different Aged Community Residents in Beijing, China: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.中国北京不同年龄段社区居民构建老年友好型社区过程的多维评估:横断面问卷调查研究
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2025 Mar 21;11:e66248. doi: 10.2196/66248.
3
Measuring the age-friendliness of cities in the Russian Federation: The translation, validation and application of the age-friendly cities and communities Questionnaire in the city of Kazan.
衡量俄罗斯联邦城市的年龄友好度:在喀山市对年龄友好型城市与社区问卷进行翻译、验证及应用。
Heliyon. 2024 Dec 10;11(1):e41100. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41100. eCollection 2025 Jan 15.
4
Construction and improvement strategies of an age-friendly evaluation system for public spaces in affordable housing communities: a case study of Shenzhen.构建和完善适老性平价房社区公共空间评价体系的策略:以深圳为例
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 18;12:1399852. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1399852. eCollection 2024.
5
Exploring the perspectives of older adults who are pre-frail and frail to identify interventions to reduce sedentary behaviour and improve mobility: a thematic content analysis.探索身体虚弱前期和虚弱的老年人的观点,以确定减少久坐行为和改善活动能力的干预措施:一项主题内容分析。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 13;24(1):1582. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19051-2.
6
The influencing factors of participation in time banking volunteer service for older adults among university students in Nanjing, China.中国南京大学生中老年人参与时间银行志愿服务的影响因素
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 11;11:1289512. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1289512. eCollection 2023.
7
Health care services for older people in COVID-19 pandemic times - A Nordic comparison.在 COVID-19 大流行时期为老年人提供的医疗保健服务——北欧比较。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2024 Mar;42(1):144-155. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2023.2296119. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
8
Implications of Aging in Place in the Context of the Residential Environment: Bibliometric Analysis and Literature Review.适老化居住环境的影响:文献计量分析与文献综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Oct 10;20(20):6905. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20206905.
9
Age Friendly Characteristics and Sense of Community of an Italian City: The Case of Macerata.适合老年人居住的特点和意大利城市的社区意识:马切拉塔案例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 May 17;20(10):5847. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20105847.
10
Living in an Age-Friendly Community: Evidence from a Masterplanned Development in Southwest Sydney.在友好社区生活:来自悉尼西南部总体规划开发的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 11;20(2):1312. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021312.