Buffel Tine, McGarry Paul, Phillipson Chris, De Donder Liesbeth, Dury Sarah, De Witte Nico, Smetcoren An-Sofie, Verté Dominique
a Department of Adult Educational Sciences , Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium, and the Cathie Marsh Centre for Census and Survey Research, School of Social Sciences, University of Manchester , Manchester , United Kingdom.
J Aging Soc Policy. 2014;26(1-2):52-72. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2014.855043.
Developing environments responsive to the aspirations of older people has become a major concern for social and public policy. Policies and programs directed at achieving "age-friendly" communities are considered to require a wide range of interventions, including actions at the level of the social and physical environment. This article compares the age-friendly approaches of two European cities, Brussels and Manchester, with a particular focus on policies and initiatives that promote active aging in an urban context. The article examines, first, the demographic, social, and multicultural contexts of Brussels and Manchester; second, the way in which both cities became members of the World Health Organization Global Network of Age-Friendly Cities and Communities; third, similarities and differences in the age-friendly approaches and actions adopted by both cities; and fourth, opportunities and barriers to the implementation of age-friendly policies. The article concludes by discussing the key elements and resources needed to develop age-friendly cities.
营造符合老年人期望的环境已成为社会和公共政策的主要关注点。旨在打造“老年友好型”社区的政策和项目被认为需要广泛的干预措施,包括社会和物质环境层面的行动。本文比较了欧洲两个城市——布鲁塞尔和曼彻斯特的老年友好型方法,特别关注在城市环境中促进积极老龄化的政策和举措。文章首先考察了布鲁塞尔和曼彻斯特的人口、社会和多元文化背景;其次,这两个城市成为世界卫生组织全球老年友好型城市和社区网络成员的方式;第三,两个城市所采取的老年友好型方法和行动的异同;第四,实施老年友好型政策的机遇和障碍。文章最后讨论了发展老年友好型城市所需的关键要素和资源。