Suppr超能文献

固定-和活动平台全膝关节置换的临床和影像学结果:一项荟萃分析。

Clinical and radiological outcomes of fixed- versus mobile-bearing total knee replacement: a meta-analysis.

机构信息

Institute of Orthopaedics, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich, Norfolk NR2 7UY, UK.

出版信息

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010 Mar;18(3):325-40. doi: 10.1007/s00167-009-0909-7. Epub 2009 Sep 25.

Abstract

Controversy exists regarding the clinical and radiological differences in outcomes between fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee replacements (TKR). The aim of this study was to compare these two TKR designs using a meta-analysis of the electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and AMED in addition to a review of unpublished material. All included papers were critically appraised using a modified PEDro critical appraisal tool. Thirty-three studies were eligible, assessing the outcomes of 3532 TKRs. Analysis suggested that there was no significant difference in clinical or radiological outcomes and complication rates between fixed- and mobile-bearing TKRs.

摘要

关于固定和活动衬垫全膝关节置换术(TKR)在临床和影像学结果方面的差异存在争议。本研究的目的是通过对 MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL 和 AMED 电子数据库的荟萃分析以及对未发表材料的回顾,来比较这两种 TKR 设计。所有纳入的论文均使用改良的 PEDro 批判性评估工具进行严格评估。有 33 项研究符合条件,评估了 3532 例 TKR 的结果。分析表明,固定和活动衬垫 TKR 在临床和影像学结果以及并发症发生率方面没有显著差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验