SPRU-Science and Technology Policy Research, The Freeman Centre, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9QE, UK.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2010 Sep;16(3):517-33. doi: 10.1007/s11948-009-9170-1.
In this article, a framework is suggested to deal with the analysis of global environmental risk governance. Climate Change is taken as a particular form of contemporary environmental risk, and mobilised to refine and characterize some salient aspects of new governance challenges. A governance framework is elaborated along three basic features: (1) a close relationship with science, (2) an in-built reflexivity, and (3) forms of governmentality. The UNFCCC-centered system is then assessed according to this three-tier framework. While the two-first requisites are largely met, the analysis of governmentality points to some institutional weak spots.
本文提出了一个框架，用以分析全球环境风险治理。气候变化被视为当代环境风险的一种特殊形式，被用来提炼和刻画新治理挑战的一些显著特征。治理框架沿着三个基本特征展开：（1）与科学的紧密关系，（2）内在的反思性，以及（3）治理形式。然后，根据这三个层次的框架，对以《联合国气候变化框架公约》为中心的体系进行评估。虽然前两个要求在很大程度上得到了满足，但对治理形式的分析指出了一些制度上的弱点。
