Bentley Michael T, Kaufman Phillip E, Kline Daniel L, Hogsette Jerome A
Entomology and Nematology Department, Institute of Food and Agriculture Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0620, USA.
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2009 Sep;25(3):285-91. doi: 10.2987/08-5815.1.
The response of adult mosquitoes to 4 light-emitting diode (LED) wavelengths was evaluated using diode-equipped sticky cards (DESCs) and diode-equipped resting boxes at 2 sites in north central Florida. Wavelengths evaluated were blue (470 nm), green (502 nm), red (660 nm), and infrared (IR) (860 nm). When trapping with DESCs, 15 mosquito species from 7 genera (Aedes, Anopheles, Coquillettidia, Culex, Mansonia, Psorophora, and Uranotaenia) were captured. Overall, approximately 43.8% of all mosquitoes were trapped on DESCs fitted with green LEDs. Significantly more females of Aedes infirmatus, Aedes vexans, and Culex nigripalpus were captured on DESCs fitted with blue LEDs compared with red or IR LEDs. DESCs with blue LEDs captured significantly more Culex erraticus females than those with IR LEDs. Using resting boxes, 12 species from 5 genera (Anopheles, Coquillettidia, Culex, Mansonia, and Uranotaenia) were collected. Resting boxes without LEDs captured 1,585 mosquitoes (22.2% of total). The fewest number of mosquitoes (16.7%) were collected from boxes affixed with the blue LEDs. Significantly more Anopheles quadrimaculatus females were aspirated from resting boxes fitted with red and IR LEDs than from those with blue or green LEDs, or from the unlit control. Blood-fed mosquitoes were recovered in highest numbers from unlit resting boxes, followed by resting boxes fitted with green, IR, and blue LEDs. Culex erraticus accounted for the majority of blood-fed mosquitoes followed by Coquillettidia perturbans. No blood-fed mosquitoes were recovered from resting boxes fitted with red LEDs.
在佛罗里达州中北部的两个地点,使用配备二极管的粘性卡片(DESC)和配备二极管的休息箱,评估了成年蚊子对4种发光二极管(LED)波长的反应。评估的波长为蓝色(470纳米)、绿色(502纳米)、红色(660纳米)和红外线(IR)(860纳米)。当用DESC诱捕时,捕获了来自7个属(伊蚊、按蚊、库蠓、库蚊、曼蚊、骚蚊和蓝带蚊)的15种蚊子。总体而言,所有蚊子中约43.8%被困在装有绿色LED的DESC上。与红色或红外线LED相比,装有蓝色LED的DESC捕获的衰弱伊蚊、骚扰伊蚊和黑尾库蚊雌蚊明显更多。装有蓝色LED的DESC捕获的不定库蚊雌蚊比装有红外线LED的DESC明显更多。使用休息箱收集了来自5个属(按蚊、库蠓、库蚊、曼蚊和蓝带蚊)的12种蚊子。没有LED的休息箱捕获了1585只蚊子(占总数的22.2%)。从装有蓝色LED的箱子中收集到的蚊子数量最少(16.7%)。从装有红色和红外线LED的休息箱中吸出的四斑按蚊雌蚊比装有蓝色或绿色LED的休息箱或未点亮的对照箱中的明显更多。从未点亮的休息箱中回收的吸血蚊子数量最多,其次是装有绿色、红外线和蓝色LED的休息箱。不定库蚊占吸血蚊子的大多数,其次是骚扰库蠓。从装有红色LED的休息箱中未回收吸血蚊子。