Department of Neuroscience, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
J Neurosurg. 2010 Sep;113(3):556-63. doi: 10.3171/2009.9.JNS09626.
In this prospective cohort study the authors examined patients with moderate to severe head injuries using MR imaging in the early phase. The objective was to explore the occurrence of diffuse axonal injury (DAI) and determine whether DAI was related to level of consciousness and patient outcome.
One hundred and fifty-nine patients (age range 5-65 years) with traumatic brain injury, who survived the acute phase, and who had a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 3-13 were admitted between October 2004 and August 2008. Of these 159 patients, 106 were examined using MR imaging within 4 weeks postinjury. Patients were classified into 1 of 3 stages of DAI: Stage 1, in which lesions were confined to the lobar white matter; Stage 2, in which there were callosal lesions; and Stage 3, in which lesions occurred in the dorsolateral brainstem. The outcome measure used 12 months postinjury was the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE).
Diffuse axonal injury was detected in 72% of the patients and a combination of DAI and contusions or hematomas was found in 50%. The GCS score was significantly lower in patients with "pure DAI" (median GCS Score 9) than in patients without DAI (median GCS Score 12; p < 0.001). The GCS score was related to outcome only in those patients with DAI (r = 0.47; p = 0.001). Patients with DAI had a median GOSE score of 7, and patients without DAI had a median GOSE score of 8 (p = 0.10). Outcome was better in patients with DAI Stage 1 (median GOSE Score 8) and DAI Stage 2 (median GOSE Score 7.5) than in patients with DAI Stage 3 (median GOSE Score 4; p < 0.001). Thus, in patients without any brainstem injury, there was no difference in good recovery between patients with DAI (67%) and patients without DAI (66%).
Diffuse axonal injury was found in almost three-quarters of the patients with moderate and severe head injury who survived the acute phase. Diffuse axonal injury influenced the level of consciousness, and only in patients with DAI was GCS score related to outcome. Finally, DAI was a negative prognostic sign only when located in the brainstem.
在这项前瞻性队列研究中,作者对早期接受 MRI 检查的中重度颅脑损伤患者进行了研究。目的是探讨弥漫性轴索损伤(DAI)的发生情况,并确定 DAI 是否与意识水平和患者预后有关。
2004 年 10 月至 2008 年 8 月期间,共有 159 例创伤性脑损伤患者(年龄 5-65 岁)存活至急性期,格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分为 3-13 分。其中 106 例患者在伤后 4 周内接受了 MRI 检查。患者被分为 3 种 DAI 阶段之一:1 期,病变局限于脑叶白质;2 期,胼胝体病变;3 期,脑桥背外侧病变。12 个月时使用的预后测量方法是格拉斯哥预后评分扩展(GOSE)。
72%的患者发现弥漫性轴索损伤,50%的患者发现弥漫性轴索损伤合并挫伤或血肿。“单纯 DAI”患者的 GCS 评分明显低于无 DAI 患者(中位数 GCS 评分 9 分 vs. 中位数 GCS 评分 12 分;p<0.001)。GCS 评分仅与 DAI 患者的预后相关(r=0.47;p=0.001)。DAI 患者的中位 GOSE 评分为 7 分,无 DAI 患者的中位 GOSE 评分为 8 分(p=0.10)。DAI 1 期(中位 GOSE 评分 8 分)和 DAI 2 期(中位 GOSE 评分 7.5 分)患者的预后优于 DAI 3 期(中位 GOSE 评分 4 分;p<0.001)。因此,在无脑干损伤的患者中,DAI 患者(67%)与无 DAI 患者(66%)的良好恢复率无差异。
在存活至急性期的中重度颅脑损伤患者中,近 3/4 的患者发现弥漫性轴索损伤。弥漫性轴索损伤影响意识水平,只有在 DAI 患者中,GCS 评分与预后相关。最后,只有当 DAI 位于脑干时,才是预后不良的标志。