Department of Small Animal Clinical Science, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Platelets. 2009 Nov;20(7):513-9. doi: 10.3109/09537100903221001.
Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have increased platelet activation compared to non-diabetic controls. Platelet hyperreactivity has been associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes in Type 2 DM, and with diabetic nephropathy. We investigated the relationship between platelet activation and nephropathy in Type 1 DM. Patients with Type 1 DM and diabetic nephropathy (n = 35), age- and sex-matched Type 1 DM patients with persistent normoalbuminuria (n = 51), and healthy age- and sex-matched controls (n = 30) were studied. Platelet surface P-selectin, platelet surface activated GPIIb/IIIa, monocyte-platelet aggregates (MPAs) and neutrophil-platelet aggregates (NPAs) were measured by whole blood flow cytometry as markers of platelet activation. Platelet reactivity was assessed in response to exogenously added ADP and thrombin receptor activating peptide (TRAP). Platelet surface P-selectin (basal and in response to 0.5 or 20 microM ADP) was higher in nephropathy patients compared with normoalbuminuric patients (P = 0.027), and non-diabetic controls (P = 0.0057). NPAs were higher in nephropathy patients compared to normoalbuminuric patients (P = 0.0088). MPAs were higher in nephropathy patients compared to non-diabetic controls (P = 0.0075). There were no differences between groups in activated GPIIb/IIIa or in response to TRAP at any end-point. More patients with nephropathy received aspirin (71.4%) compared to normoalbuminuric patients (27.4%) (P < 0.0001). Type 1 diabetic nephropathy, as compared with normoalbuminuria, is associated with circulating activated platelets and platelet hyperreactivity to ADP, despite the confounding variable of more nephropathy patients receiving aspirin. This platelet activation is likely to contribute to the known increased risk of cardiovascular events in patients with diabetic nephropathy.
与非糖尿病对照相比,糖尿病(DM)患者的血小板活化增加。血小板高反应性与 2 型 DM 的不良心血管结局以及糖尿病肾病相关。我们研究了 1 型 DM 中血小板活化与肾病的关系。患有 1 型 DM 和糖尿病肾病(n = 35)、年龄和性别匹配的持续微量白蛋白尿的 1 型 DM 患者(n = 51)以及健康的年龄和性别匹配的对照(n = 30)。通过全血流动 cytometry 测量血小板表面 P-选择素、血小板表面激活的 GPIIb/IIIa、单核细胞-血小板聚集物(MPAs)和中性粒细胞-血小板聚集物(NPAs)作为血小板活化的标志物。通过添加外源性 ADP 和血栓素受体激活肽(TRAP)评估血小板反应性。与微量白蛋白尿患者(P = 0.027)和非糖尿病对照(P = 0.0057)相比,肾病患者的血小板表面 P-选择素(基础和对 0.5 或 20 μM ADP 的反应)更高。与微量白蛋白尿患者相比,肾病患者的 NPAs 更高(P = 0.0088)。与非糖尿病对照相比,肾病患者的 MPAs 更高(P = 0.0075)。在任何终点处,各组之间的激活 GPIIb/IIIa 或对 TRAP 的反应均无差异。与微量白蛋白尿患者相比,更多的肾病患者接受了阿司匹林(71.4%)治疗(P < 0.0001)。与微量白蛋白尿相比,1 型糖尿病肾病与循环活化血小板和 ADP 高反应性相关,尽管肾病患者接受阿司匹林治疗的混杂变量更多。这种血小板活化可能导致已知的糖尿病肾病患者心血管事件风险增加。