• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ST段抬高型心肌梗死的管理:北美和欧洲最新指南的比较。

Management of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Comparison of the updated guidelines from North America and Europe.

作者信息

Thomas Deepak, Giugliano Robert P

机构信息

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2009 Nov;158(5):695-705. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.08.023.

DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2009.08.023
PMID:19853685
Abstract

The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and the European Society of Cardiology each recently published updated guidelines for management of patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction. In this article, we highlight the most important new recommendations, review their supporting data, and describe differences between the guidelines. Key aspects of these updates include detailed guidance regarding the selection of a reperfusion strategy and the incorporation of newer adjunctive antithrombotic agents. Both new guidelines suggest caution in the administration of intravenous beta-blockers, avoidance of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, and support a more aggressive approach to secondary risk factor management. The 2 guidelines have some nuanced differences as well as some recommendations that are unique to each guideline. They present different levels of support for the 4 available adjunctive parenteral anticoagulants, vary in their endorsement of routine elective coronary angiography after fibrinolysis, and cite different targets for low density lipoprotein long-term. Major unique recommendations include the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Assocaition's emphasis of a stepped approach to analgesia in patients with musculoskeletal pain beginning with acetaminophen or aspirin and a lower target international normalized ratio in patients receiving warfarin, aspirin, and clopidogrel. Meanwhile, unique recommendations in the European Society of Cardiology guidelines include measures to prevent/treat microvascular obstruction and reperfusion injury associated with percutaneous coronary intervention and greater emphasis on maintaining eugylcemia. As these guidelines represent an evidence based approach, health care providers should become familiar with the new data and the resultant updated recommendations to ensure optimal treatment of their patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

摘要

美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会以及欧洲心脏病学会最近各自发布了急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者管理的更新指南。在本文中,我们重点介绍最重要的新建议,回顾其支持数据,并描述指南之间的差异。这些更新的关键方面包括关于再灌注策略选择的详细指导以及纳入更新的辅助抗栓药物。两项新指南均建议谨慎使用静脉β受体阻滞剂,避免使用非甾体抗炎药,并支持对二级危险因素管理采取更积极的方法。这两项指南存在一些细微差别以及各自独有的一些建议。它们对4种可用的辅助肠外抗凝剂的支持程度不同,对溶栓后常规选择性冠状动脉造影的认可程度不同,并且长期低密度脂蛋白的目标引用也不同。主要的独特建议包括美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会强调对肌肉骨骼疼痛患者采取逐步镇痛方法,从对乙酰氨基酚或阿司匹林开始,以及对华法林、阿司匹林和氯吡格雷联合使用患者采用较低的国际标准化比值目标。同时,欧洲心脏病学会指南中的独特建议包括预防/治疗与经皮冠状动脉介入相关的微血管阻塞和再灌注损伤的措施,以及更加强调维持血糖正常。由于这些指南代表了基于证据的方法,医疗保健提供者应熟悉新数据和由此产生的更新建议,以确保对其ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者进行最佳治疗。

相似文献

1
Management of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Comparison of the updated guidelines from North America and Europe.ST段抬高型心肌梗死的管理:北美和欧洲最新指南的比较。
Am Heart J. 2009 Nov;158(5):695-705. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.08.023.
2
Management of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: comparison of the updated guidelines from North America and Europe.非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征的管理:北美和欧洲最新指南的比较
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2012 Jun;11(2):62-73. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0b013e3182563a7e.
3
Antiplatelet therapy in early management of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the 2002 and 2007 guidelines from North America and Europe.非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征早期管理中的抗血小板治疗:2002年和2007年北美与欧洲指南
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2008 May;51(5):425-33. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0b013e31816a35a2.
4
Perspectives on the 2009 focused updates on the management of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and percutaneous intervention.2009年ST段抬高型心肌梗死管理及经皮介入治疗重点更新内容的观点
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2010 Sep;9(3):126-33. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0b013e3181eaf53b.
5
Acute coronary care in the elderly, part II: ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology: in collaboration with the Society of Geriatric Cardiology.老年人急性冠脉护理,第二部分:ST段抬高型心肌梗死:美国心脏协会临床心脏病学理事会为医疗专业人员发表的科学声明:与老年心脏病学会合作制定
Circulation. 2007 May 15;115(19):2570-89. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.182616.
6
Prolonged emergency department stays of non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients are associated with worse adherence to the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for management and increased adverse events.非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者在急诊科停留时间延长与对美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会管理指南的依从性较差以及不良事件增加有关。
Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Nov;50(5):489-96. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.03.033. Epub 2007 Jun 20.
7
ACC/AHA guideline update for the management of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会ST段抬高型心肌梗死管理指南更新
Am Fam Physician. 2009 Jun 15;79(12):1080-6.
8
Day 1 care in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的首日护理
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2010 Jan-Mar;11(1):41-51. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2009.07.005.
9
Pharmacoinvasive management of acute coronary syndrome: incorporating the 2007 ACC/AHA guidelines: the CATH (cardiac catheterization and antithrombotic therapy in the hospital) Clinical Consensus Panel Report--III.急性冠状动脉综合征的药物侵入性管理:纳入2007年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会指南:CATH(医院心脏导管插入术和抗栓治疗)临床共识小组报告——III
J Invasive Cardiol. 2007 Dec;19(12):525-38; quiz 539-40.
10
[Treatment of ST segment elevation myocardial infarctions according to the guidelines].[根据指南治疗ST段抬高型心肌梗死]
Herz. 2005 Dec;30(8):685-94. doi: 10.1007/s00059-005-2769-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinician-patient discord: exploring differences in perspectives for discontinuing clopidogrel.医患意见不合:探索停用氯吡格雷的观点差异。
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2011 Mar;10(1):50-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2010.04.002. Epub 2010 May 21.