Suppr超能文献

基于 MRI 信号强度的 B 样条非刚性配准在前列腺近距离放射治疗中的术前和术中成像。

MRI signal intensity based B-spline nonrigid registration for pre- and intraoperative imaging during prostate brachytherapy.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 Nov;30(5):1052-8. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21955.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To apply an intensity-based nonrigid registration algorithm to MRI-guided prostate brachytherapy clinical data and to assess its accuracy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A nonrigid registration of preoperative MRI to intraoperative MRI images was carried out in 16 cases using a Basis-Spline algorithm in a retrospective manner. The registration was assessed qualitatively by experts' visual inspection and quantitatively by measuring the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) for total gland (TG), central gland (CG), and peripheral zone (PZ), the mutual information (MI) metric, and the fiducial registration error (FRE) between corresponding anatomical landmarks for both the nonrigid and a rigid registration method.

RESULTS

All 16 cases were successfully registered in less than 5 min. After the nonrigid registration, DSC values for TG, CG, PZ were 0.91, 0.89, 0.79, respectively, the MI metric was -0.19 +/- 0.07 and FRE presented a value of 2.3 +/- 1.8 mm. All the metrics were significantly better than in the case of rigid registration, as determined by one-sided t-tests.

CONCLUSION

The intensity-based nonrigid registration method using clinical data was demonstrated to be feasible and showed statistically improved metrics when compare to only rigid registration. The method is a valuable tool to integrate pre- and intraoperative images for brachytherapy.

摘要

目的

将基于强度的非刚性配准算法应用于 MRI 引导下的前列腺近距离放射治疗临床数据,并评估其准确性。

材料与方法

回顾性地对 16 例患者的术前 MRI 与术中 MRI 图像进行了非刚性配准,使用 Basis-Spline 算法。通过专家视觉检查对配准进行定性评估,并通过测量全腺(TG)、中央腺(CG)和外周区(PZ)的 Dice 相似系数(DSC)、互信息(MI)度量以及对应解剖标志之间的基准配准误差(FRE)对刚性和非刚性配准方法进行定量评估。

结果

所有 16 例患者的配准均在 5 分钟内完成。非刚性配准后,TG、CG、PZ 的 DSC 值分别为 0.91、0.89、0.79,MI 度量值为-0.19 +/- 0.07,FRE 为 2.3 +/- 1.8 毫米。所有指标均明显优于刚性配准,单侧 t 检验结果具有统计学意义。

结论

使用临床数据的基于强度的非刚性配准方法是可行的,与仅刚性配准相比,其各项指标均有统计学上的改善。该方法是整合近距离放射治疗术前后图像的有价值工具。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

10
Accuracy analysis in MRI-guided robotic prostate biopsy.MRI引导下机器人前列腺活检的准确性分析。
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2013 Nov;8(6):937-44. doi: 10.1007/s11548-013-0831-9. Epub 2013 Mar 27.

本文引用的文献

2
Is there a relationship between prostate volume and Gleason score?前列腺体积与 Gleason 评分之间有关系吗?
BJU Int. 2008 Aug 5;102(5):563-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07696.x. Epub 2008 May 12.
3
MR-guided prostate interventions.磁共振引导下的前列腺介入治疗。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Feb;27(2):356-67. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21259.
4
Automated contour mapping with a regional deformable model.使用区域可变形模型的自动轮廓映射
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Feb 1;70(2):599-608. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.09.057.
7
MR-guided interventions of the prostate gland.磁共振引导下的前列腺介入治疗。
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2007;16(4):222-9. doi: 10.1080/13645700701520669.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验