• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Domains of Risk in the Developmental Continuity of Fire Setting.纵火行为发展连续性中的风险领域。
Behav Ther. 2005 Spring;36(2):185-195. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7894(05)80067-X.
2
Female Fire-Setters: Gender-Associated Psychological and Psychopathological Features.
Psychiatry. 2016 Winter;79(4):364-378. doi: 10.1080/00332747.2016.1185892.
3
Suicidal behavior among Finnish fire setters.
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1997;247(6):303-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02922259.
4
Parents of preschool fire setters: perceptions of the child-play fire hazard.
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2006 Sep;13(3):171-7. doi: 10.1080/17457300600579425.
5
Criminal recidivism and family histories of schizophrenic and nonschizophrenic fire setters: comorbid alcohol dependence in schizophrenic fire setters.
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1997;25(2):207-15.
6
Prevalence and correlates of fire-setting in the United States: results from the National Epidemiological Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions.在美国,纵火行为的流行率及其相关因素:来自国家酒精相关情况流行病学调查的结果。
Compr Psychiatry. 2010 May-Jun;51(3):217-23. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2009.06.002. Epub 2009 Jul 10.
7
Recovery schools for improving behavioral and academic outcomes among students in recovery from substance use disorders: a systematic review.改善物质使用障碍康复期学生行为和学业成果的康复学校:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 4;14(1):1-86. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.9. eCollection 2018.
8
The need for a juvenile fire setting database.
J Burn Care Res. 2008 Nov-Dec;29(6):955-8. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e31818ba101.
9
Childhood predictors of desistance and level of persistence in offending in early onset offenders.早发性犯罪者停止犯罪及持续犯罪程度的童年预测因素。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2009 Oct;37(7):967-80. doi: 10.1007/s10802-009-9329-x.
10
Factors associated with youth gang membership in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.低收入和中等收入国家与青少年帮派成员身份相关的因素:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 29;14(1):1-128. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.11. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
The predictive validity of the family risk survey and child risk survey for identifying persistent firesetting risk.家庭风险调查和儿童风险调查对识别持续纵火风险的预测有效性。
J Clin Psychol. 2023 Feb;79(2):573-585. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23435. Epub 2022 Aug 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Two-year prediction of children's firesetting in clinically referred and nonreferred samples.临床转诊样本和非转诊样本中儿童纵火行为的两年预测。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2001 Mar;42(3):371-80.
2
Young children who commit crime: epidemiology, developmental origins, risk factors, early interventions, and policy implications.犯罪的幼儿:流行病学、发育起源、风险因素、早期干预及政策影响。
Dev Psychopathol. 2000 Autumn;12(4):737-62. doi: 10.1017/s0954579400004107.
3
Merging universal and indicated prevention programs: the Fast Track model. Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group.整合普遍预防和针对性预防项目:快车道模型。行为问题预防研究小组。
Addict Behav. 2000 Nov-Dec;25(6):913-27. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4603(00)00120-9.
4
Initial impact of the Fast Track prevention trial for conduct problems: I. The high-risk sample. Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group.针对品行问题的快速预防试验的初步影响:I. 高风险样本。品行问题预防研究小组。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1999 Oct;67(5):631-47.
5
Severe vs. nonsevere firesetters revisited.再探严重纵火者与非严重纵火者
Child Welfare. 1999 Jul-Aug;78(4):411-34.
6
The implications of different developmental patterns of disruptive behavior problems for school adjustment. Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group.破坏性行为问题的不同发展模式对学校适应的影响。预防行为问题研究小组。
Dev Psychopathol. 1998 Summer;10(3):451-67. doi: 10.1017/s0954579498001692.
7
Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: a developmental taxonomy.青春期有限型和终生持续型反社会行为:一种发展分类法。
Psychol Rev. 1993 Oct;100(4):674-701.
8
Screening of child behavior problems for prevention programs at school entry. The Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group.入学时对儿童行为问题进行筛查以实施预防项目。行为问题预防研究小组。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1995 Aug;63(4):549-59. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.63.4.549.
9
Children who set fires: some background and behavioral characteristics.纵火儿童:一些背景和行为特征。
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1981 Jul;51(3):484-488. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-0025.1981.tb01396.x.
10
Children who set fires: the clinical picture and a follow-up.纵火儿童:临床表现与随访
Br J Psychiatry. 1982 Apr;140:357-63. doi: 10.1192/bjp.140.4.357.

纵火行为发展连续性中的风险领域。

Domains of Risk in the Developmental Continuity of Fire Setting.

作者信息

McCarty Carolyn A, McMahon Robert J

机构信息

University of Washington.

出版信息

Behav Ther. 2005 Spring;36(2):185-195. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7894(05)80067-X.

DOI:10.1016/S0005-7894(05)80067-X
PMID:19865598
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2768312/
Abstract

Juvenile fire setting is a serious, dangerous, and costly behavior. The majority of research examining youth fire setting has been cross-sectional. We sought to examine early risk attributes that could differentiate fire setters from non-fire setters, in addition to examining their association with the developmental continuity of fire-setting behavior into late childhood. Using a sample of 361 youth drawn from 4 different U.S. communities, this study examined the association between a broad array of risk variables from the child, parent, and family domains, and fire-setting behavior over the course of 2 developmental periods: prior to 4th grade, and between 4th and 6th grade. Youth were classified into I of 4 groups (non-fire setters, desisters, later-onset fire setters, and persisters) based on their reported fire-setting behavior during these periods. Children who set fires had higher levels of risk on most of the variables assessed. Persistence of fire setting was associated with elevated parental depressive symptoms and more interparental conflict and ineffective discipline. The findings highlight the need for multi-component preventive interventions to address the breadth of risk experienced by fire-setting youth and their families.

摘要

青少年纵火是一种严重、危险且代价高昂的行为。大多数针对青少年纵火行为的研究都是横断面研究。我们试图研究早期风险因素,这些因素不仅可以区分纵火者和非纵火者,还能研究它们与童年后期纵火行为发展连续性之间的关联。本研究以从美国4个不同社区抽取的361名青少年为样本,考察了来自儿童、父母和家庭领域的一系列广泛风险变量与两个发展阶段(四年级之前以及四年级到六年级之间)纵火行为的关联。根据青少年在这些阶段报告的纵火行为,将他们分为4组之一(非纵火者、停止纵火者、后期开始纵火者和持续纵火者)。纵火儿童在大多数评估变量上的风险水平更高。纵火行为的持续与父母抑郁症状加剧、更多的父母间冲突以及无效管教有关。研究结果凸显了需要采取多成分预防干预措施,以应对纵火青少年及其家庭所经历的广泛风险。