• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

入学时对儿童行为问题进行筛查以实施预防项目。行为问题预防研究小组。

Screening of child behavior problems for prevention programs at school entry. The Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group.

作者信息

Lochman J E

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27706, USA.

出版信息

J Consult Clin Psychol. 1995 Aug;63(4):549-59. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.63.4.549.

DOI:10.1037//0022-006x.63.4.549
PMID:7673532
Abstract

Targeted programs designed to prevent conduct problems in childhood and adolescence rely on screening systems to identify high-risk individuals. This study examines the proximal usefulness of a multiple-gating approach to screening, using teacher and parent ratings in a 2-step procedure with a sample of 382 kindergarten children. The study explored differences in the accuracy of the 2 steps of screening information and whether parents' reports of parenting practices augments the prediction of negative outcomes. The 2-step screening system was found to effectively predict negative behavior outcomes over 1 year later, although some false-positive and false-negative predictions were evident. The Parenting Practices Screen did not substantially add to prediction accuracy. The discussion emphasizes the potential contributions and problems of using screening measures.

摘要

旨在预防儿童和青少年行为问题的针对性项目依赖筛查系统来识别高危个体。本研究使用教师和家长评分,通过两步程序,对382名幼儿园儿童样本进行研究,考察了多重筛选方法在筛查中的近期效用。该研究探讨了筛查信息两步程序在准确性上的差异,以及家长对育儿方式的报告是否能增强对负面结果的预测。尽管存在一些假阳性和假阴性预测,但发现两步筛查系统能有效预测一年多后的负面行为结果。育儿方式筛查在预测准确性方面并没有显著提高。讨论强调了使用筛查措施的潜在贡献和问题。

相似文献

1
Screening of child behavior problems for prevention programs at school entry. The Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group.入学时对儿童行为问题进行筛查以实施预防项目。行为问题预防研究小组。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1995 Aug;63(4):549-59. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.63.4.549.
2
Family- and Neighborhood-Level Factors as Predictors of Conduct Problems in School among Young, Urban, Minority Children.家庭和邻里层面的因素对城市少数族裔儿童在校行为问题的预测作用
Behav Med. 2015;41(4):177-85. doi: 10.1080/08964289.2014.907770. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
3
A process for developing community consensus regarding the diagnosis and management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.一个就注意力缺陷/多动障碍的诊断和管理达成社区共识的过程。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jan;115(1):e97-104. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0953.
4
Early risk indicators of internalizing problems in late childhood: a 9-year longitudinal study.童年晚期内化问题的早期风险指标:一项为期9年的纵向研究。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2008 Jul;49(7):774-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01889.x. Epub 2008 Jul 1.
5
Comparing an Emotion- and a Behavior-Focused Parenting Program as Part of a Multsystemic Intervention for Child Conduct Problems.比较以情绪为中心和以行为为中心的育儿计划,作为针对儿童行为问题的多系统干预的一部分。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2016;45(3):320-34. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2014.963855. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
6
Identifying at-risk children at school entry: the usefulness of multibehavioral problem profiles.入学时识别高危儿童:多行为问题概况的作用。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2003 Sep;32(3):396-407. doi: 10.1207/S15374424JCCP3203_08.
7
Detecting effects of the indicated prevention Programme for Externalizing Problem behaviour (PEP) on child symptoms, parenting, and parental quality of life in a randomized controlled trial.在一项随机对照试验中,检测针对外化问题行为的指定预防计划(PEP)对儿童症状、养育方式和父母生活质量的影响。
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2010 Jan;38(1):95-112. doi: 10.1017/S1352465809990440.
8
Families and Schools Together: an experimental study of multi-family support groups for children at risk.家庭与学校携手共进:针对高危儿童的多家庭支持小组的实验研究
J Sch Psychol. 2009 Aug;47(4):245-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2009.03.001. Epub 2009 Apr 16.
9
Parenting practices and child disruptive behavior problems in early elementary school. Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group.小学低年级阶段的育儿方式与儿童破坏性行为问题。行为问题预防研究小组
J Clin Child Psychol. 2000 Mar;29(1):17-29. doi: 10.1207/S15374424jccp2901_3.
10
Classification accuracy and acceptability of the Integrated Screening and Intervention System Teacher Rating Form.综合筛查与干预系统教师评级表的分类准确性与可接受性
Sch Psychol Q. 2017 Jun;32(2):212-225. doi: 10.1037/spq0000147. Epub 2016 Feb 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Randomized controlled trial of the early adolescent coping power program: Effects on emotional and behavioral problems in middle schoolers.青少年早期应对能力项目的随机对照试验:对中学生情绪和行为问题的影响
J Sch Psychol. 2025 Jun;110:101437. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2025.101437. Epub 2025 Apr 1.
2
Grandmother and Grandchild Reports of Psychological Difficulties Among Custodial Grandchildren: Whose View Matters and Why is It Important?监护孙辈中祖孙对心理困扰的报告:谁的观点重要以及为何重要?
Child Youth Serv Rev. 2023 May;148. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106793. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
3
Fast Track intervention effects on family formation.
快速通道干预对家庭形成的影响。
J Fam Psychol. 2023 Feb;37(1):54-64. doi: 10.1037/fam0001039. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
4
Developmental Models of Depression, Externalizing Problems, and Self-regulatory Processes: Integrated Data Analysis Across Four Longitudinal Studies of Youth.抑郁、外化问题和自我调节过程的发展模型:对四项青少年纵向研究综合数据的分析。
Prev Sci. 2023 Nov;24(8):1499-1509. doi: 10.1007/s11121-022-01441-w. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
5
Exploring Parenting Profiles to Understand Who Benefits from the Incredible Years Parenting Program.探索育儿模式以了解谁能从“非凡岁月育儿项目”中受益。
Prev Sci. 2023 Feb;24(2):259-270. doi: 10.1007/s11121-022-01364-6. Epub 2022 Mar 19.
6
A study protocol for a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a dog-facilitated physical activity minimal intervention on young children's physical activity, health and development: the PLAYCE PAWS trial.一项随机对照试验的研究方案,旨在评估犬辅助的体育活动最小干预对幼儿身体活动、健康和发育的有效性:PLAYCE PAWS 试验。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-10034-7.
7
The Fast Track intervention's impact on behaviors of despair in adolescence and young adulthood.快速通道干预对青少年和青年期绝望行为的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Dec 15;117(50):31748-31753. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2016234117. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
8
When Does Differential Item Functioning Matter for Screening? A Method for Empirical Evaluation.差异项目功能在筛查中何时重要?一种实证评估方法。
Assessment. 2021 Mar;28(2):446-456. doi: 10.1177/1073191120913618. Epub 2020 Apr 4.
9
The Relations Among Stress, Executive Functions, and Harsh Parenting in Mothers.母亲的压力、执行功能与严厉教养之间的关系
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2020 May;48(5):619-632. doi: 10.1007/s10802-020-00622-x.
10
How Early Is Too Early? Identification of Elevated, Persistent Problem Behavior in Childhood.早到何时?儿童期持续性问题行为的早期识别。
Prev Sci. 2020 May;21(4):445-455. doi: 10.1007/s11121-019-01060-y.