• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同波长 X 射线对结肠杆菌的杀灭作用。

THE KILLING OF COLON BACILLI BY X-RAYS OF DIFFERENT WAVE LENGTHS.

机构信息

Laboratories of The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research.

出版信息

J Exp Med. 1930 Oct 31;52(5):769-80. doi: 10.1084/jem.52.5.769.

DOI:10.1084/jem.52.5.769
PMID:19869802
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2131905/
Abstract

X-ray beams of wave lengths lying in the range between 4 A and 0.5 A all kill B. coli in a semilogarithmically linear fashion. Interpreted in terms of the known quantized absorption of X-rays, this means that one absorption of any of these radiations is sufficient to kill. Though death results from a single absorption, only about one hit in four with Ag K and one in sixty with Ag L radiation is deadly. The course of curves constructed from these experimental results suggests that the portion of this bacterium which is essential to its continued life has a total of approximately 0.01 of the cell volume. For copper and harder radiations the biological action of the rays is proportional to their measured air ionization. The same biological change with the softer chromium K. and silver L X-rays seems to require a somewhat more intensely ionizing beam.

摘要

波长在 4A 至 0.5A 之间的 X 射线以半对数线性方式杀死 B. coli。根据已知的 X 射线量子吸收解释,这意味着这些辐射中的任何一种的单次吸收就足以杀死。尽管死亡是由单次吸收引起的,但只有大约四分之一的 Ag K 和六十分之一的 Ag L 辐射的命中是致命的。从这些实验结果构建的曲线表明,对细菌的持续生命至关重要的部分约占细胞体积的 0.01。对于铜和更硬的辐射,射线的生物作用与它们在空气中的电离成正比。对于较软的铬 K 和银 L X 射线,同样的生物变化似乎需要一个更强烈的电离束。

相似文献

1
THE KILLING OF COLON BACILLI BY X-RAYS OF DIFFERENT WAVE LENGTHS.不同波长 X 射线对结肠杆菌的杀灭作用。
J Exp Med. 1930 Oct 31;52(5):769-80. doi: 10.1084/jem.52.5.769.
2
THE KILLING OF CERTAIN BACTERIA BY X-RAYS.X 射线对某些细菌的杀灭作用。
J Exp Med. 1930 Aug 31;52(3):435-46. doi: 10.1084/jem.52.3.435.
3
THE KILLING OF COLON BACILLI BY ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT.紫外线杀死大肠杆菌。
J Gen Physiol. 1932 Jan 20;15(3):351-61. doi: 10.1085/jgp.15.3.351.
4
MO-A-BRB-02: Facts and Fiction of Flattening Filter Free (FF-FFF) X-Rays Beams.MO - A - BRB - 02:无平片滤过(FF - FFF)X射线束的事实与虚构
Med Phys. 2012 Jun;39(6Part20):3861-3862. doi: 10.1118/1.4735765.
5
Induction and rejoining of DNA double-strand breaks in Chinese hamster V79-4 cells irradiated with characteristic aluminum K and copper L ultrasoft X rays.用特征铝K和铜L超软X射线辐照中国仓鼠V79-4细胞后DNA双链断裂的诱导与重新连接
Radiat Res. 1997 Oct;148(4):317-24.
6
Quantitative evaluation of the parameters of bacterial photoreactivation after exposure to ultraviolet light and ionizing radiation.紫外线和电离辐射照射后细菌光复活参数的定量评估。
Int J Radiat Biol. 2005 Jan;81(1):55-62. doi: 10.1080/09553000500092244.
7
Differences in wedge factor determination in air using a PMMA mini-phantom or a brass build-up cap.使用聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)微型体模或黄铜等效建成帽在空气中确定楔形因子的差异。
Med Phys. 1997 Dec;24(12):1986-91. doi: 10.1118/1.598112.
8
Studies on the mechanism of action of ionizing radiations; inhibition of enzymes by X-rays.电离辐射作用机制的研究;X射线对酶的抑制作用。
J Gen Physiol. 1949 Mar 20;32(4):537-52. doi: 10.1085/jgp.32.4.537.
9
Overview and new developments in softer X-ray (2A < lambda < 5A) protein crystallography.软X射线(2Å<λ<5Å)蛋白质晶体学的概述与新进展
J Synchrotron Radiat. 2004 Jan 1;11(Pt 1):1-3. doi: 10.1107/s0909049503024099. Epub 2003 Nov 28.
10
Experimental investigation of GafChromic EBT3 intrinsic energy dependence with kilovoltage x rays, Cs, and Co.针对千伏级X射线、铯和钴对GafChromic EBT3本征能量依赖性的实验研究。
Med Phys. 2018 Jan;45(1):448-459. doi: 10.1002/mp.12682. Epub 2017 Dec 22.

引用本文的文献

1
THE KILLING OF COLON BACILLI BY ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT.紫外线杀死大肠杆菌。
J Gen Physiol. 1932 Jan 20;15(3):351-61. doi: 10.1085/jgp.15.3.351.
2
ENHANCED LETHAL EFFECTS OF X-RAYS ON BACILLUS COLI IN THE PRESENCE OF INORGANIC SALTS.X 射线在无机盐存在下对大肠杆菌的致死效应增强。
J Exp Med. 1933 Jan 31;57(2):335-47. doi: 10.1084/jem.57.2.335.