Di Tullio M, Sacco R L, Venketasubramanian N, Sherman D, Mohr J P, Homma S
Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY.
Stroke. 1993 Jul;24(7):1020-4. doi: 10.1161/01.str.24.7.1020.
The prevalence of a patent foramen ovale has been shown to be increased in patients with ischemic stroke. Transesophageal echocardiography, transthoracic echocardiography, and transcranial Doppler examination with contrast injection can all be used to search for a patent foramen ovale. We compared the accuracy of these techniques for identifying a patent foramen ovale in 49 patients with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack.
Transcranial Doppler examination of the right middle cerebral artery was performed during simultaneous transthoracic echocardiography with aerated saline injection, and again during transesophageal echocardiography; the latter was adopted as the "gold standard" for assessing the sensitivity of the other two tests.
Contrast transesophageal echocardiography detected a patent foramen ovale in 19 of 49 patients (39%), during normal respiration in 15 of them and during Valsalva maneuver in 4. Transcranial Doppler correctly identified 13 patients with a patent foramen ovale and all 30 patients without it. Therefore, the sensitivity of transcranial Doppler was 68% (13/19), and its specificity 100% (30/30). The 6 patients misclassified by transcranial Doppler (false negatives) had a very small right-to-left shunt detected by transesophageal echocardiography. Contrast transthoracic echocardiography was found to be the least sensitive test, detecting a patent foramen ovale in only 9 of 19 patients (47%). The specificity of transthoracic echocardiography was 100% (30/30 patients). The low sensitivity of transthoracic echocardiography was principally due to the suboptimal image quality obtained in false-negative patients. Both transcranial Doppler and transthoracic echocardiography were more sensitive in patients with cryptogenic stroke than in patients with stroke of determined origin. This may indicate the presence of larger, more easily detectable shunts in patients with cryptogenic stroke.
Transesophageal echocardiography is more sensitive than transcranial Doppler examination in detecting a patent foramen ovale, but only in cases of minimal right-to-left shunts, the clinical relevance of which remains to be established. The sensitivity of transthoracic echocardiography is heavily hampered by the frequency of inadequate heart visualization.
缺血性卒中患者卵圆孔未闭的患病率已被证实有所增加。经食管超声心动图、经胸超声心动图以及经颅多普勒造影检查均可用于筛查卵圆孔未闭。我们比较了这几种技术在49例急性缺血性卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作患者中识别卵圆孔未闭的准确性。
在经胸超声心动图注射生理盐水时,同时对右侧大脑中动脉进行经颅多普勒检查,在经食管超声心动图检查时再次进行经颅多普勒检查;后者被用作评估其他两项检查敏感性的“金标准”。
经食管超声心动图造影在49例患者中的19例(39%)检测到卵圆孔未闭,其中15例在正常呼吸时检测到,4例在瓦尔萨尔瓦动作时检测到。经颅多普勒正确识别出13例卵圆孔未闭患者以及所有30例无卵圆孔未闭的患者。因此,经颅多普勒的敏感性为68%(13/19),特异性为100%(30/30)。经颅多普勒误诊的6例患者(假阴性)经食管超声心动图检测到非常小的右向左分流。经胸超声心动图造影被发现是最不敏感的检查,仅在19例患者中的9例(47%)检测到卵圆孔未闭。经胸超声心动图的特异性为100%(30/30例患者)。经胸超声心动图敏感性低主要是由于假阴性患者获得的图像质量欠佳。经颅多普勒和经胸超声心动图在隐源性卒中患者中比在明确病因的卒中患者中更敏感。这可能表明隐源性卒中患者存在更大、更易检测到的分流。
经食管超声心动图在检测卵圆孔未闭方面比经颅多普勒检查更敏感,但仅在右向左分流极小的情况下,其临床意义仍有待确定。经胸超声心动图的敏感性因心脏可视化不佳的频率而严重受限。